Berita telus dan seimbang..

Category archive

Rencana

Misteri Kewujudan Sungai Mendidih Akhirnya Terbongkar!

in Rencana by
sungai
500x500xa-legendary-boiling-river-discovered-1-7640-img-1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8_EOWaAs5G
Seorang ahli geosaintis mendedahkan bahawa cerita mitos mengenai sebatang sungai yang airnya mendidih di tengah-tengah hutan Amazon di Peru merupakan satu fenomena yang benar.
Mail Online melaporkan, Andres Ruzo berkata, beliau mula mende-ngar mengenai cerita sungai yang terletak di Mayantuyacu itu daripada datuknya apabila diceritakan mengenai bagaimana kumpulan penjajah Sepanyol membunuh maharaja terakhir kaum Inca.
mendidih
Bagaimanapun, katanya, kebanyakan ahli akademik menafikan kewujudan sungai misteri sepanjang lebih enam kilometer itu memandangkan kawasan tersebut jauh dari sebarang aktiviti gunung berapi.
Selepas mendengar cerita ibu saudaranya yang mendakwa pernah ke sana, Ruzo yang ketika itu sedang mengikuti pengajian peringkat doktor falsafah dalam bidang geofizik nekad untuk menjejaki sungai terbabit.
“Saya bertanya berhubung kewujudan sungai itu kepada rakan-rakan di universiti, kerajaan, minyak, gas dan syarikat perlombongan, jawapan mereka adalah sama iaitu tidak.
“Secara logiknya, memang be­tul kerana sungai seperti itu hanya wujud di kawasan berhampiran gunung berapi. Jika tidak, kita memerlukan satu sumber tenaga yang kuat untuk menghasilkan tenaga geoterma yang besar,” katanya.
Ruzo akhirnya berjaya menemukan sungai yang mempunyai kelebaran 25 meter dan enam meter dalam itu yang menjadi tempat suci masyarakat pribumi yang mendiami kawasan Mayantuyacu, Ashaninka selepas dibawa oleh ibu saudaranya.
“Tangan saya akan melecur jika saya mencelup tangan di dalam sungai itu tidak sampai setengah saat dan jika terjatuh ke dalamnya, saya akan mati.
12725214_192986811061679_117572458_n
“Air sungai itu kelihatan mendidih kerana ia merupakan sebahagian daripada aliran air panas di bumi,” katanya.
Beliau menceritakan pengalamannya menjejaki kewujudan su­ngai berkenaan dalam buku bertajuk ‘The Boiling River: Adventure and Discovery in the Amazon’.

Halal Berkhalwat dan LGBT,Sokongan 48 NGO Bukti Noor Farida G25 Ditaja DAP

in Rencana by

Pendedahan yang dibuat oleh portal AIDC tidak mengejutkan,apatah lagi G25 dilihat ekstrim liberal sudah pasti kita semua tahu siapakah dalang disebalik kebobrokan mereka semua.

Perjuangan G25 tak jauh beza dengan perjuangan puak LGBT , benar benar merosakkan akidah,menghalalkan apa saja dengan atas nama “human right” dan “freedom of speech”

Kita semua harus faham,kenapa kita perlu menolak DAP,PAN dan PKR.. Pisau pasti dengan adanya Umno dan PAS ,dua parti melayu Islam terbesar dinegara ini tidak akan membiarkan sama sekali ekstrim liberal berleluasa dinegara ini.

Sokongan 48 badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) kumpulan sivil terhadap Datuk Noor Farida Ariffin membuktikan gerak kerja jurucakap kumpulan G25 itu ditaja DAP.

Ini kerana 48 NGO kumpulan sivil yang menyokong Noor Farida hampir sama dengan NGO-NGO yang menyokong BERSIH 2.0.

Menurut laman globalresearch yang memetik sumber asal NDI (sebelum diubahsuai), REFSA(Research for Social Advancement) adalah satu-satunya sekretariat BERSIH yang bekerjasama dengan dengan NDI (National Democratic Institute) pada tahun 2005.

noor-farida-bersih

RESFA adalah badan pemikir DAP yang dimiliki oleh Liew Chin Tong yang sekarang merupakan Ahli Parlimen DAP Kluang, Pengerusi DAP Johor dan Pengarah Pendidikan Politik Kebangsaan DAP.

Manakala NDI adalah adalah salah satu cabang NED (National Endowment for Democracy), sebuah yayasan demokrasi yang berpangkalan di Amerika Syarikat.

bersih-dap

Menurut laman bersih.org , ‘Bengkel Pembaharuan Pilihan Raya’ yang diadakan di Kuala Lumpur pada September 2006 telah menghasilkan BERSIH yang dikawal oleh tiga jawatankuasa pemandu iaitu Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), Women’s Development Collective (WDC) dan Writers Alliance for Media Independence (WAMI).

SUARAM adalah milik bekas ahli parlimen DAP di Petaling Jaya (1990-1995), Dr Kua Kia Soong.

WDC ketika itu diwakili oleh Maria Chin Abdullah yang juga merupakan pemilik Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER).

20647419290_86f18ef399_z

Maria Chin diiktiraf berforum dengan penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang pada 7 Februari 2015 dalam program ‘Mengenang Negarawan, Meraikan Sasterawan’ anjuran Roketkini.com.

WAMI pula milik Dr Wong Chin Huat yang sekarang ini merupakan penganalisis sosial dan politik badan pemikir Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang, Penang Institute.

board-pi

Pengerusi Ahli Lembaga Pengarah, Penang Institute adalah Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Lim Guan Eng.

Liew Chin Tong juga merupakan salah seorang Ahli Lembaga Pengarah badan pemikir kerajaan DAP Pulau Pinang itu.

Pada 31 Oktober, badan pemikir DAP itu telah menganjurkan program bersama dengan G25 bertajuk “Forum G25 : Maqasid Syariah Dalam Demokrasi Perlembagaan” ? di Olive Tree Hotel, Bayan Lepas, Pulau Pinang.

Selanjutnya sila baca “Lim Guan Eng Dalang Kumpulan G25 & Gagasan ‘Maqasid Syariah’ II ?

 

Pisau kata ” freedom of speech & human right jarum halus yahudi..lebih bahaya dari komunis”

 

Surat Terbuka Vendor Kepada Tun M, Dedah Banyak Kelemahan Proton Dan Ketirisan.Apa Pula Jawapan Tun M?

in Rencana by
img_6266.jpeg

Ariff Abd. Md  
YABhg Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad,
Asalamualaikum wbt Tun. Saya mendoakan agar Tun sentiasa diberikan kesihatan dan hidayah oleh Allah SWT. Pada mulanya, saya ingin menulis surat ini di dalam Bahasa Inggeris, tetapi biarlah saya meneruskan tulisan dengan bahasa ibunda kita agar ramai dapat membaca dan memahami surat ini.
YABhg Tun, sejak kebelakangan ini saya lihat Tun sangat aktif berada di pentas politik untuk mendesak DS Najib meletakkan jawatan. Tun menghabiskan banyak masa menghadiri forum, bual bicara, program dan perjumpaan tertutup untuk meluahkan ketidakpuasan hati Tun mengenai pengurusan kerajaan dibawah pimpinan DS Najib. Sudah tentu, topik 1MDB merupakan topik yang paling utama dalam setiap ucapan Tun.
Tetapi disebalik semua ini, adakah Tun sedar bahawa Tun merupakan pengerusi Proton dan Proton sedang menghadapi masalah yang sangat besar. Saya tidak menulis surat ini berdasarkan kata-kata orang atau cakap-cakap pasar, tetapi sebagai salah seorang vendor Proton.
Kami tahu Proton sedang mengalami masalah yang sangat besar kerana Proton sudah mula tidak membayar kami. Proton sedang cuba membuat satu solusi bodoh dengan menawarkan kereta-kereta yang tidak terjual sebagai ‘contra’ bayaran untuk kami. Adakah Proton sedar bahawa kami ini bukan salesman kereta tetapi kilang komponen kereta.
Selain 6000 pekerja Proton, terdapat beratus vendor Tier 1, 2 dan 3 dan puluhan ribu pekerja yang bekerja dengan syarikat-syarikat vendor ini. Masalah 1MDB (yang dilihat kini mempunyai jalan penyelesaian selepas penjualan Edra) tidak akan membuatkan puluhan ribu rakyat tiba-tiba hilang pekerjaan serta merta. Tetapi masalah Proton akan mengakibatkan jutaan ringgit kerugian pada usahawan bumiputera dan puluhan ribu pekerja hilang punca pendapatan dalam masa 2-3 bulan sahaja lagi. Tun perlu ingat, operator-operator kilang ini datang dari keluarga susah dengan pendapatan RM900 sebulan sahaja!
Saya mohon pada Tun, janganlah dibazirkan masa Tun sendiri dan orang Melayu dengan politik. Pilihanraya lambat lagi, pemilihan UMNO pun lambat lagi, kalau Tun ceramah hari-hari pun DS Najib tak akan letak jawatan. Lebih baik Tun ambil berat masalah Proton yang sedang nazak, lebih nazak daripada 1MDB.
Terlalu banyak kesilapan yang dibuat oleh Proton, sebelum dan selepas Tun jadi Pengerusi. Kami lihat sejak Tun jadi Pengerusi keadaan lebih teruk. Jangan disalahkan kerajaan kerana tidak memberi bantuan RM3billion kepada Proton untuk R&D. Itu adalah alasan bodoh bagi kami, kerana kami tahu setakat mana kemampuan Proton untuk menggunakan wang RM3billion itu sebaiknya untuk R&D setaraf pengeluar kereta asing. Kalau ‘drawing simple part’ pun boleh bertukar-tukar sampai berkali-kali dan akhirnya technician saya yang cuma lulusan SPM pun lebih bijak dari engineer Proton.
Sekarang ini Proton sedang kelam kabut dengan development Persona R, Saga R dan Perdana Baru. Kerja Proton memang kelam kabut, suka buat kerja saat-saat akhir dan suka tukar keputusan. Nak mass production untuk Persona bulan 1, sampai hari ini banyak keputusan belum diselesaikan. Saga R mass production bulan 4 tetapi design part pun belum confirm! Kalau Perodua, tahun depan nak mass production, tahun lepas sudah selesai semuanya.
Bercakap pasal Perdana pula, saya tak tahulah ini ego Tun atau ego Proton nak buat Perdana baru. Adakah Tun atau Proton terlalu naif untuk fikir bahawa Perdana tersebut tidak akan dapat dijual? Sedangkan model Preve dan Suprima yang kononya bakal mencecah jualan ribuan unit sebulan sekarang cuma terjual 100-200 unit sahaja. Bagaimana Perodua boleh menjual Myvi (6000 unit sebulan), Alza (3000 unit sebulan), Axia (12,000 unit sebulan)? Jawapanya mudah, ianya mampu milik! Jika harga Proton sudah cecah hampir RM70-80k, orang Malaysia sudah tentu lebih berminat beli kereta import seperti honda atau toyota walaupun 2nd hand.
Padanlah sampai sekarang pun ramai vendor menolak untuk mengambil kontrak Perdana. Berapa juta Proton habiskan untuk beri kepada syarikat Dream Edge untuk reka Perdana baru? Kenapa tidak guna duit itu untuk beri kepada R&D Proton untuk develop kereta yang mampu milik seperti Perodua. Nanti kalau Perdana tak dapat jual, Tun akan paksa kerajaan beli, kalau kerajaan tak beli (sebab baru ganti perdana lama dengan perdana kahwin honda), Tun akan marah DS Najib lagi.
Eloklah Tun luangkan masa untuk Proton. Lihatlah bagaimana pengurusan Perodua baik daripada pihak Malaysia dan juga pihak Daihatsu. 2-3 orang Jepun di Perodua lebih cekap daripada 2-3 ratus pekerja di Proton. Lawatan Tun ke Perodua pun menjadi bahan ketawa kepada mereka semua. Tun tidak harus menyalahkan kerajaan sikit pun atas kegagalan Proton, kerana Perodua juga syarikat Malaysia tetapi mampu bersaing dan mampu maju tanpa bantuan kerajaan.
Lihatlah pada pengurusan Proton, mereka tidak kompeten, tidak cekap dan ada yang tidak amanah. Tun fikirlah bagaimana Perodua boleh memperolehi harga komponen dengan lebih murah, tetapi komponen yang sama bila ke Proton menjadi lebih mahal. Makna, banyak ketirisan terjadi dalam Proton. Saya akan menceritakan ketirisan-ketirisan ini dalam surat saya yang kedua, bagaimana ada beberapa orang dari pihak pengurusan dan pembelian Proton yang tidak amanah.
Kalau bab berlagak dan bodoh sombong bila datang ke tempat vendor, serahlah pada Proton. Memang berlagaknya nombor 1, mengalahkan Perodua, Honda, Volkswagen dan lain-lain OEM yang volumenya jauh lebih tinggi dari Proton dan paling penting, mereka semua bayar supplier!
Jika Proton tidak berubah dalam masa terdekat ini, mungkin vendor-vendor akan sepakat untuk memberhentikan supply kepada Proton. Production line Proton akan terhenti dan Proton tidak akan ada kereta untuk dikeluar dan dijualkan. Jangan salahkan kami, kerana hutang Proton kepada kami vendor-vendor bumiputera ini dah cecah ratusan juta! Banyak lagi cerita buruk Proton yang kami dengar dan kami tahu. Ada yang kata Proton membayar sewa tanah bernilai jutaan ringgit sebulan pada ahli keluarga Tun. Benar atau tidak, itu kami tak kisah jika Proton mampu menjalankan perniagaan dengan baik.
Kami merupakan antara usahawan yang paling cekal di Malaysia. Saya mempuyai beberapa syarikat lain yang menceburi bidang construction, trading, development dan macam-macam lagi. Tetapi bidang automotive manufacturing ini adalah yang paling mencabar kerana memerlukan sistem, kualiti, ketepatan masa dan pengurusan yang sangat cekap seperti syarikat Jepun.
Kepada mereka yang tidak mempercayakan surat ini, boleh pergi mana-mana kilang pembuatan komponen automotif dan tanya, ‘Bagaimana Proton?’. Anda akan dengar caci, maki, kutuk, kisah teraniya, ditipu dan macam-macam lagi. Jika tanya, ‘Bagaimana Perodua?’ anda akan dapat jawapan ‘sangat mencabar, tetapi payment tak pernah lambat, volume sentiasa tinggi’. Walaupun berurusan dengan Perodua lebih memeningkan kepala kerana terpaksa mengikut standard yang tinggi yang diletakkan oleh Jepun dari Daihatsu, ianya lebih berbaloi. Jepun Daihatsu akan datang ‘spot check’ kilang kami secara mengejut pada jam 7.30 pagi untuk memastikan operasi kami sentiasa dalam keadaan yang memuaskan!
Nasihat saya pada Tun, tengoklah Proton. Janganlah buang masa dengan Khairuddin, Anina, Amidah dan kawan-kawan Tun lain yang asik nak berpolitik sahaja! Buat malu je bangsa Melayu dengan Jepun-jepun dekat Perodua tu. Kalau perlu RM3billion nak bayar hutang, cakap lah terus terang dekat kerajaan, mana tahu mereka boleh bantu beri pinjam. Jangan berselidung disebalik alasan R&D, memang tak munasabah.
 
Ariff Abd. Md

Tier 1 and 2 Automotive Supplier,

ISO TS 16949 & MS ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company

Specialise in High Precision Parts

“Rafizi Simpan sedikit kebodohanmu, keegoanmu, keceluparanmu untuk masa pencenmu! ” – Pelajar Di New York Hentam Rafizi .

in Rencana by
IMG_3435.JPG

Saya sangat terkejut dengan Pembohongan dan Pembodohan oleh Rafizi dalam laporan ini http://m.malaysiakini.com/news/313987
Pertama sekali, majlis pada 28 Oktober 2015 di Bangunan Ambasador Malaysia di New York itu adalah Majlis Sepetang bersama Perdana Menteri. Tidak ada Majlis Dialog!!! Kenapa Rafizi merepek. 
Sejak jadi YB kenapa asyik BERBOHONG sahaja Rafizi? Adakah itu taraf kamu? Jika kamu tidak hadir ke New York dan kamu tidak melihat suasana majlis tidak usah kamu bercakap mengenainya ! Kamu hanya akan mengumpul dosa kering!
Walaupun PM sangat sibuk, baharu sahaja selesai mesyuarat dengan Presiden Obama dan lain-lain ketua kerajaan, PM masih sudi bersama kami. Apatah lagi keadaan jalan di New York jammed di mana-mana. PM kelihatan sangat letih tetapi melayan kami seperti anak-anaknya, kami dari pelbagai kaum merasa sangat friendly, selesa dan gembira. 
Hampir 1 jam PM berucap mengenai perancangan ekonomi dan pembangunan Malaysia, kemajuan dan cabaran, kami sanggup berdiri lama mendengarnya. Perdana Menteri menggunakan slaid dan ianya sungguh menarik.

Perdana Menteri juga beramah mesra hampir satu jam makan bersama kami sambil bertukar pandangan secara dekat, dari hati ke hati dan kami berpuashati. PM melanggar protokolnya dengan tidak makan secara berasingan di meja VVIP tetapi sanggup berbaris bersama kami mengambil makanan di meja yang disediakan untuk orang ramai. 
Semasa kami makan bersama, kami bertanya banyak perkara, kami meluahkan banyak perkara. Kami faham PM dikritik kerana dasar-dasarnya yang tidak popular, tetapi bukti global menunjukkan PM melakukan perkara yang tepat untuk masa akan datang. 
Bagi kami, kami lebih percayakan PM daripada agenda Rafizi. Kami sudah hilang respect kepada Rafizi kerana banyak bercakap tetapi tidak nampak apa-apa hasil daripada percakapannya.
Asyik-asyik persoal dasar kerajaan, kami sudah naik bosan!!! 
Asyik recycle isu yang sama amat menjumudkan!!! Rafizi memberi gambaran rakyat Malaysia bodoh belaka. Kami pun tahu membezakan mana yang baik kepada negara, kami sangat bosan dengan cara Rafizi dan pembangkang.
Sangat memalukan dan tidak nampak kematangan hidup bernegara. Kalaulah Rafizi di Amerika Syarikat buat cara yang sama asyik repeat isu seolah-olah rakyat pekak dan bodoh, saya percaya rakyat Amerika akan panggil Rafizi si Bodoh from Malaysia! Memalukan!!!
Matanglah sikit, kalau nak kempen tunggulah PRU14 , sekarang masa untuk bekerja. Jangan tanam kebencian yang keterlaluan kepada kerajaan seolah-olah tiada satu pun perkara yang baik dari kerajaan!
Simpan sedikit kebodohanmu, keegoanmu, keceluparanmu untuk masa pencenmu! Kami sudah bosan dengan retorik dan isu-isu yang kamu recycle. 
Kami mahu masa depan. Kami tak mahu cakap banyak walaupun popular untuk kamu!
Pelajar Malaysia,

New York, USA.
Pisau kata ” tu la.. tak cover langsung kebodohan .. mmg semua orang tau budak pizi lembu ni bodoh sombong.. dengan orang pandan boleh la dia boohooong !”

‘Malaya Untuk Orang Melayu’, Kata Khoo Kay Kim

in Rencana by
IMG_1989.JPG

BANGI – Perbalahan antara kaum yang berlaku di negara ini berpunca daripada kejahilan generasi muda berkenaan sejarah.
Pihak yang mempersoalkan hak keistimewaan Melayu yang tercatat dalam Perkara 153 Perlembagaan Persekutuan tidak mengetahui bahawa hak keistimewaan itu sudah lama wujud dan diiktiraf oleh pihak British.
“Kalau kita memberi tumpuan kepada sejarah, kita (akan) faham apa sebenarnya yang telah berlaku. British tak pernah menafikan ini adalah tanah orang Melayu.

   
   
“Pada tahun 1931, di Durbar, persidangan Raja-Raja Melayu yang berlangsung di Seri Menanti memang sudah ditetapkan, ‘Malaya for the Malays’, itu sangat jelas, sebelum perang dulu, tak ada orang menyoal masa itu,” kata pakar sejarah, Profesor Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Khoo Kay Kim dalam satu temu bual eksklusif oleh Ismaweb di pejabatnya di Jabatan Sejarah, Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Sosial, Universiti Malaya di Kuala Lumpur, baru-baru ini.
Ketika British berada di Tanah Melayu, orang Melayu mempunyai kelebihan berdasarkan status ‘rakyat raja’ yang diberikan kepada orang Melayu yang lahir di negeri-negeri Melayu ketika itu.
“Sepanjang masa British di sini, (hak istimewa Melayu) sudah ada, walaupun bukan dipanggil Perkara 153.
“Sebelum perang dunia kedua, sesiapa yang lahir di Negeri-Negeri Selat, Pulau Pinang, Melaka, Singapura, – Negeri-Negeri Selat itu dipanggil Tanah Jajahan Mahkota British – sesiapa yang lahir di situ termasuk orang Melayu menjadi rakyat British. Sesiapa yang lahir di negeri-negeri Melayu kalau ibu bapa mereka adalah orang Melayu, mereka menjadi rakyat raja. Kalau ibu bapa bukan orang Melayu, mereka menjadi stateless citizen.
“Kalau orang Melayu melangar undang-undang, membuat kesalahan serius, mereka boleh dibuang negeri tapi buat sementara, kemudian boleh kembali ke sini, Tanah Melayu tempat asal mereka.
“Tapi orang bukan Melayu dihantar balik ke negara asal, tak boleh balik sini.
“Jadi perbezaan itu sangat jelas,” katanya lagi.
Justeru beliau menyeru semua pihak agak kembali melihat sejarah bagi mengelakkan perbalahan antara kaum berlaku.
“Kalau kita tahu bagaimana keadaan dulu, bagaimana sempurnanya masyarakat kita, tiba-tiba timbul macam-macam masalah (hari ini), jadi kita seharusnya cuba kembali kepada keadaan dulu, yang sudah lepas tak semestinya tak baik, banyak yang lebih baik daripada sekarang,” katanya lagi.
Beliau tidak menolak kepentingan menjaga kaum sendiri tetapi seseorang yang telah menjadi warganegara mesti menzahirkan cintanya kepada negara kelahirannya mengatasi negara asal keturunannya.
“Pemikiran mereka macam itulah sejak kecil lagi memang tertumpu kepada keturunan mereka. Mereka tak faham, keturunan itu walaupun penting, tapi kalau seseorang itu sudah menjadi warganegara sesebuah negara, katalah seorang berasal dari Australia, dia duduk di Jepun kemudian menjadi warganegara Jepun, dia seharusnya menunjukkan perasaan cinta pada Jepun.
“Dia tak boleh kata Australia lebih penting dari Jepun, tapi (kefahaman) ini tidak dijelaskan kepada golongan muda, golongan muda tak faham tentang ini semua,” katanya –ismaweb.net
Pisau kata “tak sedar diri dan buta sejarah.. “

Mesti Baca ! Kenapa PPS diharamkan?

in Rencana by
wpid-pps.png

SEPERTI dijangka dari awal lagi, isu penahanan 156 anggota Pasukan Peronda Sukarelawan (PPS) pada 31 Ogos lalu terus hangat diperkatakan, terutama sekali setelah Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Lim Guan Eng mencabar Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Abu Bakar untuk berdebat secara terbuka dengannya mengenai penubuhan PPS itu.

Guan Eng secara terbuka mengecam tindakan polis menahan anggota PPS itu, sambil menyifatkan tindakan Khalid itu sebagai menyalahgunakan kuasa. Beliau turut bertanya apakah pihak polis akan turut menahannya sama seperti polis menahan Exco yang menjaga hal ehwal PPS, iaitu Phee Boon Poh?

Sementara itu, Ketua Polis Negeri Pulau Pinang, Datuk Abdul Rahim Hanafi, memberitahu bahawa polis sedang memburu saki baki anggota PPS yang dianggarkan berjumlah lebih 9,000 orang.

Rahim mendedahkan bahawa 11 anggota PPS dari 156 orang yang ditahan polis pada 31 Ogos itu didapati mempunyai rekod jenayah lampau – antaranya melibatkan jenayah cubaan membunuh, ahli kongsi gelap, penyalahgunaan dadah, kesalahan di bawah Akta Kastam dan kesalahan di bawah Ordinan Darurat 1969.

Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Seri Dr. Ahmad Zahid Hamidi turut menasihatkan kerajaan Pulau Pinang membubarkan PPS kerana badan itu merupakan satu pertubuhan haram yang tidak berdaftar dengan Pendaftar Pertubuhan (ROS).

Satu entiti haram

Justeru pada sambutan Hari Kemerdekaan lalu, Polis menahan 156 anggota PPS semasa mereka mengambil bahagian dalam perayaan Merdeka di peringkat negeri Pulau Pinang. Menjelaskan rasional tindakan polis itu, Khalid menyatakan bahawa PPS dianggap satu entiti haram di bawah Seksyen 41 Akta Pertubuhan kerana ia tidak didaftarkan dengan Pendaftar Pertubuhan.

Guan Eng sebaliknya mempertahankan bahawa PPS adalah satu organisasi yang sah kerana ia ditubuhkan oleh kerajaan negeri. Selama empat tahun PPS tidak berdepan dengan apa-apa masalah dari pihak polis kecuali satu dua insiden, di mana tindakan tatatertib telah pun diambil oleh kerajaan negeri dan mereka yang bersalah telah pun dihukum.

Sehari sebelumnya, pada 30 Ogos, Guan Eng menegaskan bahawa anggota PPS akan tetap mengambil bahagian dalam perayaan sambutan Merdeka itu, walaupun telah diberi amaran oleh polis bahawa sesiapa sahaja dalam kalangan anggota PPS yang menyertai perarakan itu akan ditangkap.

Di bawah Seksyen 41 Akta Pertubuhan, satu pertubuhan itu menjadi pertubuhan haram (unlawful society) sekiranya ia tidak didaftarkan di bawah Seksyen 7.

Mengikut Seksyen 2, istilah “pertubuhan” diberi takrif yang luas, meliputi antara lain “kelab, syarikat, perkongsian atau persatuan tujuh orang ahli atau lebih, tidak kira apa pun sifat atau matlamatnya, sama ada sementara atau berkekalan”, tetapi tidak termasuk beberapa entiti yang disebutkan secara nyata dalam seksyen itu.

Menjadi pegawai satu pertubuhan haram adalah salah di bawah Seksyen 42 – boleh dihukum penjara selama 5 tahun, denda RM15,00 atau kedua-duanya sekali. Menjadi ahli pertubuhan haram juga satu kesalahan di bawah Seksyen 43 – boleh dihukum penjara 3 tahun, denda RM5,000 atau kedua-duanya sekali.

Perbuatan mendorong, menggalakkan atau mempelawa orang lain untuk menjadi ahli atau menyertai satu pertubuhan haram juga satu kesalahan di bawah Seksyen 45 – boleh dihukum penjara 4 tahun, denda RM15,000 atau kedua-duanya sekali.

Ini bermakna bukan hanya pegawai dan ahli PPS yang boleh ditangkap, ditahan dan didakwa di mahkamah di bawah Akta Pertubuhan. Mana-mana orang (termasuk ahli Exco kerajaan atau Ketua Menteri sekali) yang sengaja mendorong, menggalakkan atau mempelawa (incite, induce or invite”) orang awam lain menyertai PPS juga boleh dikenakan prosiding jenayah dan jika sabit kesalahan boleh dikenakan hukuman.

Kenapa Pulau Pinang perlukan PPS?

Mengikut Exco kerajaan negeri, Phee Boon Poh, PPS ditubuhkan oleh kerajaan negeri pada 8 April 2009 untuk membantu kerja “community policing” disebabkan Kerajaan Persekutuan tidak begitu berminat melayan permintaan kerajaan negeri untuk meningkatkan Rukun Tetangga dan Rela Corp demi keselamatan negeri.

Pihak yang menyokong penubuhan PPS ini menyatakan bahawa disebabkan kekurangan polis menjaga keamanan di negeri ini, orang awam terpaksa membuat rondaan secara sukarela. Apabila suatu jenayah berlaku, para sukarelawan inilah yang kadangkala sampai dulu ke tempat kejadian jenayah, dan mereka dibenarkan oleh undang-undang menjalankan “citizen’s arrest”.

Tidak semua yang berpendapat sedemikian itu. Ada yang berkata bahawa negara ini sudahpun ada PDRM, ada Rela, ada Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat untuk membantu rakyat negara ini dan menjalankan tugas menjaga keamanan dan kesejahteraan rakyat. Selain itu, Guan Eng sendiri telah pun mengakui bahawa Pulau Pinang telah mencatatkan penurunan kadar jenayahnya selama ini – iaitu 27% pada tahun 2010 dan 25% dalam 6 bulan pertama tahun 2011.

Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang itu juga telah mengakui bahawa penurunan kadar jenayah di negeri adalah hasil kerja kuat PDRM, serta pemasangan CCTV dan penyertaan anggota masyarakat. Jadi apa perlunya lagi diwujudkan PPS?

Isu patut diselesaikan lama dulu

Pengerusi Majlis Peguam Negeri Pulau Pinang, Abdul Fareed Abdul Gafoor, berpendapat isu PPS itu sepatutnya diselesaikan lama dulu lagi. Pada pendapatnya, PPS sepatutnya didaftarkan dengan ROS sebaik sahaja ia diwujudkan oleh kerajaan negeri.

Mengikut Fareed, kerajaan negeri mendakwa PPS ini tertakluk kepada bidang kuasanya. Tetapi tidak ada satu pun undang-undang negeri yang ada menyatakan sedemikian itu. Andainya kerajaan negeri berkeras menyatakan PPS di bawah bidang kuasanya dan PDRM telah bertindak salah terhadapnya, ia perlu mendapatkan perisytiharan dari mahkamah.

Pada hemat saya, persoalan utama dalam isu PPS ini adalah sekalipun ia didaftarkan di bawah Akta Pertubuhan, apakah fungsinya boleh meliputi menjaga keselamatan dan ketenteraman awam? Bolehkah ROS membenarkan satu pertubuhan di negara ini menjalankan fungsi sedemikian itu?wpid-img-20140829-wa0027.jpg

Andainya kita semak secara terperinci Jadual ke Sembilan Perlembagaan Persekutuan, kita akan dapati bahawa dalam Item 3 Senarai I (iaitu Senarai Persekutuan) bahawa “Internal security, including – (a) Police …. Public order” adalah dalam bidang kuasa Kerajaan Pusat, bukan kerajaan negeri.

Jelas sekali, sebuah kerajaan negeri seperti Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang tidak ada kuasa di sisi Perlembagaan Persekutuan untuk menubuhkan apa-apa badan atau pertubuhan yang fungsinya seperti polis, iaitu menjaga keselamatan dan ketenteraman awam.

Kerja berkaitan keselamatan, kepolisan dan ketenteraman awam adalah kerja PDRM. PPS, yang ditubuhkan sebagai pertubuhan ala polis oleh Guan Eng, adalah jelas sekali haram di sisi undang-undang negara.

 

Oleh Salleh Buang

PENULIS ialah Penganalisis Undang-undang

Tun Mahathir “Baru” Tahu Sebab Kontraktor Bumiputra Tiada Kualiti,Satu Sindiran Tajam Hentam Puak Ultrakiasu.

in melayu rasis/Rencana by
20140708-162838-59318131.jpg

1. Sekarang baru saya tahu kenapa kontraktor Melayu tidak pernah diberi kontrak oleh swasta Malaysia. Mengikut Fellow Kanan Institut Kajian Sosioekonomi dan Alam Sekitar (SERI). Dr Michael Lim Mah Hui, Bumiputra tiada kualiti.

2. Ketua Pakar Ekonomi RAM Holdings, Dr Yeah Kim Leng, pula berkata, swasta mementingkan meritokrasi, bukan menutup peluang kepada Melayu

3. Kita tahu Kerajaan yang dikuasai oleh Melayu yang tidak berkualiti, telah mengambil hampir 100% Melayu untuk menjadi pegawai dan kakitangan Kerajaan. Hasilnya dapat kita lihat Malaysia tidak dapat ditadbir dengan baik dan pembangunannya memang buruk sekali berbanding dengan negara-negara lain yang mencapai kemerdekaan bersama dengan Malaysia.

4. Kerajaan yang dianggotai oleh Melayu yang tidak berkualiti ini gagal menangani kemerosotan ekonomi dan kewangan pada 1997/98. Ramailah peniaga dan pengusaha negara terutama dari kaum yang memiliki merit yang bankrap semasa krisis matawang kerana tindakan “control” oleh Bumiputera. Sehingga kini ekonomi dan kewangan negara tidak dapat dipulih oleh Kerajaan Melayu yang tidak berkualiti ini.

5. Sesungguhnya untuk mengelak kerosakan negara, Melayu yang tidak berkualiti ini tidak harus diberi apa-apa peluang menuntut ke peringkat universiti kerana mereka tentu tidak akan lulus dan mendapat apa-apa ijazah. Tindakan pemaju swasta mengutamakan merit memanglah wajar. Ini bukan kerana tidak mahu memberi peluang kepada Melayu, tetapi kerana mengutamakan merit.

6. Meritokrasi memang baik bagi Malaysia. Jangan bagi apa-apa pun yang tidak berasas kepada merit. Orang yang tidak berkualiti tidak mempunyai hak dan tempat di Malaysia. Biarlah mereka kekal dengan kualiti buruk mereka asalkan yang berkualiti, yang memiliki merit meraih segala-galanya untuk mereka. Kemerdekaan Negara dari dijajah oleh British bertujuan memberi segala-galanya kepada yang memiliki merit dan bukan untuk yang tidak berkualiti.

7. Dan saya bersetuju dengan pendapat pakar-pakar orang cina dari SERI dan RAM Holdings. Orang yang tidak ada kualiti tidak ada tempat di Malaysia kita yang Merdeka. Mereka harus tahu nikmat kemerdekaan bukan untuk mereka. Nikmat ini hanya untuk yang mempunyai merit walaupun orang cina tidak berjuang langsung untuk membebaskan Malaysia dari penjajah.

-Tun Mahathir-
20140708-162828-59308811.jpg

Cuaca panas global selubungi Ramadan

in Rencana by
SAWAH boleh menjadi kering akibat fenomena El Nino.

IBADAH Ramadan tahun ini bertambah mencabar ekoran fenomena El Nino yang menyebabkan rantau Asia Pasifik menerima cuaca panas dan lembab luar biasa. Selain itu, Ramadan yang tiba pada pertengahan musim panas di hemisfera utara menambahkan lagi cabaran sedia ada.

Kali terakhir Ramadan jatuh pada pertengahan musim panas adalah 30 tahun lalu iaitu pada tahun 1980. Malah, ibadah puasa kali ini dianggap lebih mencabar oleh kebanyakan pakar-pakar pengkaji cuaca di seluruh dunia kerana faktor pemanasan global yang menyebabkan suhu bumi terus meningkat.

 

Berdasarkan suhu global, negara seperti Kuwait dan Iraq mencatatkan suhu harian sehingga 50 darjah celcius. Selain itu, umat Islam di Doha, Qatar pula perlu berpuasa dengan tempoh waktu yang lebih panjang iaitu 13 jam sehari dari terbit matahari pada pukul 4.55 pagi sehingga terbenam pada pukul 6.25 petang.

Ekoran faktor cuaca global, beberapa negara Islam telah mengambil pendekatan berjaga-jaga seperti mengurangkan waktu bekerja bagi meringankan tanggungjawab umat Islam menyempurnakan ibadah puasa.

Sebagai contoh, kerajaan Qatar terlebih dahulu mewajibkan setiap majikan mengurangkan masa bekerja sehingga dua jam berbanding hari biasa.

Manakala, kerajaan Maghribi pula telah memendekkan tempoh waktu siang supaya pekerja-pekerja dan buruh di negara itu dapat berbuka sejam lebih awal. Pakistan juga tidak ketinggalan mengambil keputusan memendekkan pemotongan bekalan elektrik harian sehingga 22 jam.

Di Asia Pasifik pula, Ramadan tahun ini berlaku ketika puncak musim El Nino. Cuaca panas dan lembab luar biasa ini berlaku akibat suhu air yang lebih panas di tengah dan timur Lautan Pasifik lalu menyebabkan pergerakan menaik wap yang kuat serta merendahkan tekanan permukaan di kawasan terbabit.

Bagi umat Islam di Malaysia, kali terakhir negara dilanda El Nino ialah pada awal April 1998 dan suhu panas yang direkodkan adalah 40.1 darjah celcius di Chuping, Perlis.

Kali ini, Malaysia menerima nasib sama seperti negara jiran Brunei, Singapura, Indonesia, selatan Thailand dan Filipina apabila tekanan atmosfera meningkat menyebabkan terjadi cuaca yang lebih kering.

Menurut seorang doktor yang berpangkalan di Kazan, Rusia, Dr. Ildar Tukhvatullin, beliau amat menekankan kepentingan berbuka puasa dengan betul serta tidak meninggalkan sahur.

“Elak makan terlalu banyak. Umat Islam perlu mengambil makanan yang tinggi karbohidrat seperti buah kering, kurma, daging, ikan, produk tenusu dan elakkan minuman bergas,” katanya.

Sementara itu, pelajar bidang kesihatan, Mubarakah Ibrahim dari FitMuslimah.com pula mencadangkan umat Islam meminum air sebanyak 300 mililiter (ml) setiap setengah jam untuk mengelakkan dehidrasi apabila berpuasa keesokan harinya.

– DHIYA’ZULHILMI DAUD

Cara Berhemah AirAsia Ambil Wang Anda . Now Everyone Has To Pay RM3 KLIA2 Airport Fees.

in Rencana by
airasia-porn-stars-perhaps-2
AirAsia imposes RM3.00 KLIA2 Airport Fees per passenger.  Cebu Pacific Air, Tiger and Malindo Air do not charge such airport fees.
AirAsia imposes RM3.00 KLIA2 Airport Fees per passenger. Cebu Pacific Air, Tiger and Malindo Air do not charge such airport fees.

Everyone thought that AirAsia is a very powerful airline when it announced that it will stay put in LCCT despite the completion of KLIA2.  Now Everyone Can Laugh Out Loud at the 180 degree u-turn when AirAsia starts to operate at KLIA2 today.

 

 

Now AirAsia has created another controversy whereby it is charging KLIA2 Airport Fees of RM3.00 per passenger. AirAsia directors must be given credit for coming up with such innovative Airport Fees which no other airline dare to dream about it.

 

BK sidhu, the editor of Star Business, who is known to have published an article to mislead the investing public that the IPO of AirAsia X shares will be over-subscribed by 5 to 6 time.

 

It is an open secret that Ms BK Sidhu has been highlighting stories to make AirAsia smell like a rose.  Surely this is a matter of public interest which a responsible newspaper ought to carry to keep the public informed of this new development.  Lets see whether the highly acclaimed editor of Business Star Ms BK Sidhu will highlight the RM3 KLIA2 Airport Fees charged by AirAsia.

 

When this Airport Fees have gone viral in the cyberspace, many can’t  help but to believe for a moment that KLIA2 was built with AirAsia fund.  It is definitely not otherwise YB Datuk Nur Jazlan, the PAC Chairman would not have issued the strange press statement, HERE.

 

KLIA2 was built by MAHB and every passengers have to pay Airport Tax to MAHB for the use of KLIA2 or for any other airport in Malaysia.

 

Since passengers have paid the compulsory Airport Tax, AirAsia or any other airline have no right to impose an Airport Fees of whatever amount.

 

AirAsia hidden charges for international flight

 

AirAsia hidden charges for domestic flight

 

Just look at the above tables of hidden charges, which were a few years old, levied by AirAsia upon its passengers. Can you imagine there is a Processing Fees of RM30.00 for international flight and RM20.00 for domestic flight charged to the passenger if credit card was used for payment!  By the way most of AirAsia’s passengers purchased their tickets online and the mode of payment had to be by credit card.   In another word, on top of the fare, fuel charges, Airport Tax the passengers had to pay the processing fees for using credit card to make payment.

 

How about the CONVENIENCE FEES of RM8.00 What is so convenience for passengers to travel with AirAsia?  Prior to moving to KLIA2, there was no aerobridge and the passengers had to walk up to the aircraft.  If it is raining then the passengers will be facing inconvenience of being getting wet even with the use of umbrella. For those disabled persons then they will have to pay for wheelchair service fees of RM60 per trip.     Read More

10 Brilliant Real Heists As Dramatic As The Movies

in Rencana by
Photo credit: GeorgHH/Wikimedia

The perfect crime is a Hollywood staple. We love watching people commit large-scale theft, so long as they’re really clever about it. These sorts of capers aren’t just found in film, however. Whether it’s an astonishingly elaborate scheme pulled off with perfect precision or a plan audaciously exploiting the system in the simplest way possible, the following crimes all have the entertaining touch of heist magic.

 

10 Andre Stander

Andre Stander was a detective prodigy. He finished at the top of his class and became a captain by age 31. As the head of the Criminal Investigation Department in Kempton Park, South Africa, he knew a lot about robberies. That proved extremely useful when he decided to become a bank robber in 1977.

Stander was a master of disguise. He would rob a bank on his lunch break then return in the afternoon to investigate the crime without being recognized by any of the witnesses. He robbed 30 banks in three years and would likely have continued to get away with it if he hadn’t tried while drunk to recruit a colleague from the Bureau of State Security. His friend notified a senior officer, and they staked out Stander to catch him in the act.

In 1980, Stander went to prison, and that’s where his bank robbing career really took off. He met two other bank robbers there, and the three men plotted an escape. Stander and his accomplices overpowered their guards during a trip to a physiotherapist and fled. They became the Stander gang, and they robbed banks like it was an Olympic event. In two months, the men robbed 20 banks, including four in a single day, making five times the money Stander had made in his original three years.

The gang would stroll into a bank confidently and calmly and pick out the most vulnerable cashier—almost always a woman. They would approach her and order her to fill a bag with cash, and then they’d walk out before anyone else in the bank was aware a robbery had even taken place. On one occasion, the security guard held the door open for them as they left. Armed police were stationed outside banks, but the gang changed disguises and just walked past the police with their bags of cash. They were gone before the alarm could be raised.

The gang lived a life of luxury. They had multiple houses with servants and sports cars, and they dined out every day. They also hired many prostitutes, which turned out to be their downfall when one of the girls recognized and reported the men.

On January 30, 1984, police stormed one of the gang’s safe houses. Stander himself wasn’t there—he’d traveled to Florida for a new life using a forged Australian passport. A used car dealer had read about the gang in a newspaper and notified police when Stander turned up to have a Mustang repainted. Stander was shot and killed while trying to wrestle a shotgun from one of the officers sent to arrest him.

 

9- The Great Brink’s Robbery

Photo credit: GeorgHH/Wikimedia
Photo credit: GeorgHH/Wikimedia

The security company Brink’s has been the victim of some of the most famous heists in history, and you can find three already on Listverse. The Great Brink’s Robbery of 1950 was the first to become a sensation. It’s been called perfect, fabulous, and “the crime of the century.”

On January 17 of that year, a group of men walked into the Brink’s Armored Car depot in Boston and left 30 minutes later with $2.7 million in cash, checks, and securities. It was the biggest heist in US history at the time.

The gang behind the theft had staked out the depot for 18 months, aborting six attempts in the six weeks leading up to the robbery in search of the perfect opportunity. The robbers, wearing Halloween masks and navy chauffeurs’ uniforms, passed through at least three locked doors to reach the second floor where the crime took place. They bound five employees at gunpoint but hardly spoke.

The FBI followed thousands of leads, all of which resulted in dead ends. The truck used by the robbers had been stolen from a Ford dealer two months before the robbery and was found cut up and smashed two months afterward. In the end, It wasn’t any attempt by law enforcement that solved the case—it was a group schism.

One of the robbers, Specs O’Keefe, went to prison for an unrelated charge. He left his share of the money with another member of the gang but made it clear that he was willing to talk if they cut him out. The other robbers panicked and sent a hit man to kill O’Keefe. O’Keefe was shot—but he survived. This was enough to push him over the edge, and he cut a deal with authorities and revealed all.

The robbers came astonishingly close to getting away with the crime—they were indicted just four days before the statute of limitations for the robbery was due to pass. Despite the guilty parties being found, only around half the cash has ever been recovered.

 

8 – The Great Pearl Robbery

03
In 1913, a jeweler sent the the world’s most valuable pearl necklace from Paris to London—by regular mail. Normal post was seen as safer than a courier for transporting valuables, as they were mixed in with thousands of other items and almost impossible for a thief to target.

The package appeared to arrive safely, its three seals intact. Yet when it was opened, the necklace was gone. During transit, a thief had replaced the pearls with sugar cubes of the exact same weight as the jewelry, resealed the package, and sent it on.

The New York Times reported the necklace’s value at $650,000—around $15 million today. The crime was executed perfectly, and only the robbers’ attempt to sell the necklace got them caught. They were lured to a meeting with a potential buyer, who was actually an undercover police officer.

The four men behind the crime were led by noted jewel thief Joseph Grizzard, described as a likable version of Sherlock Holmes’s nemesis Moriarty. The lead detective on the case later visited Grizzard in prison and argued for his early release. The full details of how the crime was carried out were never revealed, but it involved bribing at least two postal workers with $1,000—more than the average yearly salary at the time—and a total budget of $12,000.

Undoubtedly the winner in the whole thing was a piano maker named Augustus Horne. He noticed a small bag in the gutter one day in London and picked it up, believing it to contain marbles. He gave one to a homeless man then tried to trade some for a pint of beer. No one wanted any, but a barman encouraged him to go to the police. Horne had inadvertently discovered 58 of the pearls and ended up receiving a reward of £10,000.

7-The Trust Company Securities Theft

04
When $590,000 in securities vanished from the United States Trust Company in New York in 1934, the New York Times reported that the theft occurred “under circumstances which convinced police that they had not been stolen.” The police put it down to an accident and assumed the notes had been misplaced, even though they’d gone missing 10 minutes after being delivered, in full view of 12 people.

The FBI realized they had a criminal on their hands when another $1.5 million went missing the following month in the Manhattan company’s offices. Once again, the theft occurred in a broker’s office “under circumstances that ordinarily would seem to bar any possibility of theft.” The hunt for the phantom thief was on.

The investigation that followed was massive and involved the police forces of three countries. The first recovery of $310,000 in bonds occurred after federal agents pursued thieves down the Atlantic coast, then from Florida to California, and then to the Bahamas. Eight men were arrested.

Another $440,000 was traced to Paris. Two bonds for $100,000 were found in a suitcase in Grand Central, and another $200,000 was found rolled up in a tin of lima beans in someone’s house. An anonymous tip delivered by a telegraph messenger boy led agents to $640,000 in a locked luggage box at a subway station. In total, 16 people were arrested in a case led by J. Edgar Hoover himself—yet the secret of how the thefts were done was never revealed.

 

6The Chelambra Bank Robbery

05

Photo credit: Vinayaraj V.R.

The four-man gang that robbed the North Malabar Gramin Bank in Chelembra, India was able to spend plenty of time preparing for their heist. In 2007, they noticed a restaurant was available for lease, and it was located directly beneath the bank. The gang paid to rent the space and stuck up a sign saying it was under renovation and would reopen on January 8, 2008. They also bought furniture for their renovation to avoid suspicion. Sadly for hungry locals, the restaurant never opened. Instead, the robbers cut through the floor of the bank on December 30 and made off with 80 million rupees (around $1.3 million).

They cut into the bank’s strong room in the early hours of Sunday morning, so the robbery wasn’t discovered for over a day. The gang planted evidence in the restaurant that made them appear to be supporters of Naxalism, a communist guerilla movement active in India.

The thieves left numerous other false clues. A kilogram (2.2 lb) of stolen gold was abandoned in a hotel room in Hyderabad, over 700 kilometers (450 mi) away. They also made phone calls from cities all over the country to overload investigators. Police got a break by looking for something suspicious in the two million phone calls handled by the nearest cell tower during the time of the robbery. They found a secret number that the robbers had used to communicate and were able to trace the robbers to a house where they were hiding out.

By February 28, most of the treasure was recovered, and the robbers had all confessed. Three of the men were sentenced to 10 years in prison, and the fourth got five.

 

5The 300-Million-Yen Grab

06
On December 10, 1968, four bank employees were in a car transporting 294.3 million yen to a Toshiba factory. At the time, that was worth $817,520, the equivalent of over $5 million today. As the staff were driving by Fuchu Prison in Tokyo, they were approached by a policeman on a motorcycle. The man told the employees their manager’s house had been bombed, and that there might be a bomb under the car.

The staff got out, and the police officer dropped to the ground to check underneath the vehicle. Suddenly, smoke and flames erupted from the car, and the police officer told the group to run before the engine exploded. The bank workers fled as quickly as they could, before turning to see the “policeman” driving away. A freshly used flare lay on the ground

The robber left 120 pieces of evidence behind, including the motorcycle. However, none of it was useful, and police eventually realized the random objects had been scattered on purpose to throw investigators off-course. The investigation itself was huge—170,000 officers looked into 110,000 suspects.

The statute of limitations passed in 1975 without anyone being caught, and the robber was free of civil liabilities after 20 years. He could legally sell his story and face no consequences, but no reliable claimant has ever come forward.

4 – The Stopwatch Gang


The all-Canadian three-man bank-robbing team known as the Stopwatch Gang were responsible for over 100 heists, with proceeds of over $15 million during the 1970s and ’80s. They earned their nickname because they used stopwatches to ensure they were never in a bank for more than two minutes. They could perform a robbery in as little 90 seconds.

They were famous for never needing to fire a shot. One of their first robberies, stealing $750,000 worth of gold bars from Ottawa Airport, was carried out by gang member Stephen Reid disguising himself as a baggage handler and simply walking out with the loot. They were caught for that crime, but when they left prison, they moved to the US and created new identities for themselves in Arizona. They told their neighbors they worked in entertainment and took regular business trips to California.

In total, they robbed over 140 banks. In true Hollywood style, it was their last big job, on which they hoped to retire, that got them caught. The gang customized a rented vehicle and spent weeks staking out and planning to steal a cash delivery at a Bank of America branch. On September 23, 1980, they took $283,000—but left a clue that led back to them. All of the gang were arrested. Stephen Reid was picked up on his way to the airport to get the plane he’d bought to leave the country and start his new life.

Crime

10 Brilliant Real Heists As Dramatic As The Movies

Alan Boyle

The perfect crime is a Hollywood staple. We love watching people commit large-scale theft, so long as they’re really clever about it. These sorts of capers aren’t just found in film, however. Whether it’s an astonishingly elaborate scheme pulled off with perfect precision or a plan audaciously exploiting the system in the simplest way possible, the following crimes all have the entertaining touch of heist magic.

10Andre Stander

Andre Stander was a detective prodigy. He finished at the top of his class and became a captain by age 31. As the head of the Criminal Investigation Department in Kempton Park, South Africa, he knew a lot about robberies. That proved extremely useful when he decided to become a bank robber in 1977.

Stander was a master of disguise. He would rob a bank on his lunch break then return in the afternoon to investigate the crime without being recognized by any of the witnesses. He robbed 30 banks in three years and would likely have continued to get away with it if he hadn’t tried while drunk to recruit a colleague from the Bureau of State Security. His friend notified a senior officer, and they staked out Stander to catch him in the act.

In 1980, Stander went to prison, and that’s where his bank robbing career really took off. He met two other bank robbers there, and the three men plotted an escape. Stander and his accomplices overpowered their guards during a trip to a physiotherapist and fled. They became the Stander gang, and they robbed banks like it was an Olympic event. In two months, the men robbed 20 banks, including four in a single day, making five times the money Stander had made in his original three years.

The gang would stroll into a bank confidently and calmly and pick out the most vulnerable cashier—almost always a woman. They would approach her and order her to fill a bag with cash, and then they’d walk out before anyone else in the bank was aware a robbery had even taken place. On one occasion, the security guard held the door open for them as they left. Armed police were stationed outside banks, but the gang changed disguises and just walked past the police with their bags of cash. They were gone before the alarm could be raised.

The gang lived a life of luxury. They had multiple houses with servants and sports cars, and they dined out every day. They also hired many prostitutes, which turned out to be their downfall when one of the girls recognized and reported the men.

On January 30, 1984, police stormed one of the gang’s safe houses. Stander himself wasn’t there—he’d traveled to Florida for a new life using a forged Australian passport. A used car dealer had read about the gang in a newspaper and notified police when Stander turned up to have a Mustang repainted. Stander was shot and killed while trying to wrestle a shotgun from one of the officers sent to arrest him.

9The Great Brink’s Robbery

02

Photo credit: GeorgHH/Wikimedia

The security company Brink’s has been the victim of some of the most famous heists in history, and you can find three already on Listverse. The Great Brink’s Robbery of 1950 was the first to become a sensation. It’s been called perfect, fabulous, and “the crime of the century.”

On January 17 of that year, a group of men walked into the Brink’s Armored Car depot in Boston and left 30 minutes later with $2.7 million in cash, checks, and securities. It was the biggest heist in US history at the time.

The gang behind the theft had staked out the depot for 18 months, aborting six attempts in the six weeks leading up to the robbery in search of the perfect opportunity. The robbers, wearing Halloween masks and navy chauffeurs’ uniforms, passed through at least three locked doors to reach the second floor where the crime took place. They bound five employees at gunpoint but hardly spoke.

The FBI followed thousands of leads, all of which resulted in dead ends. The truck used by the robbers had been stolen from a Ford dealer two months before the robbery and was found cut up and smashed two months afterward. In the end, It wasn’t any attempt by law enforcement that solved the case—it was a group schism.

One of the robbers, Specs O’Keefe, went to prison for an unrelated charge. He left his share of the money with another member of the gang but made it clear that he was willing to talk if they cut him out. The other robbers panicked and sent a hit man to kill O’Keefe. O’Keefe was shot—but he survived. This was enough to push him over the edge, and he cut a deal with authorities and revealed all.

The robbers came astonishingly close to getting away with the crime—they were indicted just four days before the statute of limitations for the robbery was due to pass. Despite the guilty parties being found, only around half the cash has ever been recovered

8The Great Pearl Robbery

03
In 1913, a jeweler sent the the world’s most valuable pearl necklace from Paris to London—by regular mail. Normal post was seen as safer than a courier for transporting valuables, as they were mixed in with thousands of other items and almost impossible for a thief to target.

The package appeared to arrive safely, its three seals intact. Yet when it was opened, the necklace was gone. During transit, a thief had replaced the pearls with sugar cubes of the exact same weight as the jewelry, resealed the package, and sent it on.

The New York Times reported the necklace’s value at $650,000—around $15 million today. The crime was executed perfectly, and only the robbers’ attempt to sell the necklace got them caught. They were lured to a meeting with a potential buyer, who was actually an undercover police officer.

The four men behind the crime were led by noted jewel thief Joseph Grizzard, described as a likable version of Sherlock Holmes’s nemesis Moriarty. The lead detective on the case later visited Grizzard in prison and argued for his early release. The full details of how the crime was carried out were never revealed, but it involved bribing at least two postal workers with $1,000—more than the average yearly salary at the time—and a total budget of $12,000.

Undoubtedly the winner in the whole thing was a piano maker named Augustus Horne. He noticed a small bag in the gutter one day in London and picked it up, believing it to contain marbles. He gave one to a homeless man then tried to trade some for a pint of beer. No one wanted any, but a barman encouraged him to go to the police. Horne had inadvertently discovered 58 of the pearls and ended up receiving a reward of £10,000.

7The Trust Company Securities Theft

04
When $590,000 in securities vanished from the United States Trust Company in New York in 1934, the New York Times reported that the theft occurred “under circumstances which convinced police that they had not been stolen.” The police put it down to an accident and assumed the notes had been misplaced, even though they’d gone missing 10 minutes after being delivered, in full view of 12 people.

The FBI realized they had a criminal on their hands when another $1.5 million went missing the following month in the Manhattan company’s offices. Once again, the theft occurred in a broker’s office “under circumstances that ordinarily would seem to bar any possibility of theft.” The hunt for the phantom thief was on.

The investigation that followed was massive and involved the police forces of three countries. The first recovery of $310,000 in bonds occurred after federal agents pursued thieves down the Atlantic coast, then from Florida to California, and then to the Bahamas. Eight men were arrested.

Another $440,000 was traced to Paris. Two bonds for $100,000 were found in a suitcase in Grand Central, and another $200,000 was found rolled up in a tin of lima beans in someone’s house. An anonymous tip delivered by a telegraph messenger boy led agents to $640,000 in a locked luggage box at a subway station. In total, 16 people were arrested in a case led by J. Edgar Hoover himself—yet the secret of how the thefts were done was never revealed.

6The Chelambra Bank Robbery

05

Photo credit: Vinayaraj V.R.

The four-man gang that robbed the North Malabar Gramin Bank in Chelembra, India was able to spend plenty of time preparing for their heist. In 2007, they noticed a restaurant was available for lease, and it was located directly beneath the bank. The gang paid to rent the space and stuck up a sign saying it was under renovation and would reopen on January 8, 2008. They also bought furniture for their renovation to avoid suspicion. Sadly for hungry locals, the restaurant never opened. Instead, the robbers cut through the floor of the bank on December 30 and made off with 80 million rupees (around $1.3 million).

They cut into the bank’s strong room in the early hours of Sunday morning, so the robbery wasn’t discovered for over a day. The gang planted evidence in the restaurant that made them appear to be supporters of Naxalism, a communist guerilla movement active in India.

The thieves left numerous other false clues. A kilogram (2.2 lb) of stolen gold was abandoned in a hotel room in Hyderabad, over 700 kilometers (450 mi) away. They also made phone calls from cities all over the country to overload investigators. Police got a break by looking for something suspicious in the two million phone calls handled by the nearest cell tower during the time of the robbery. They found a secret number that the robbers had used to communicate and were able to trace the robbers to a house where they were hiding out.

By February 28, most of the treasure was recovered, and the robbers had all confessed. Three of the men were sentenced to 10 years in prison, and the fourth got five.

5The 300-Million-Yen Grab

06
On December 10, 1968, four bank employees were in a car transporting 294.3 million yen to a Toshiba factory. At the time, that was worth $817,520, the equivalent of over $5 million today. As the staff were driving by Fuchu Prison in Tokyo, they were approached by a policeman on a motorcycle. The man told the employees their manager’s house had been bombed, and that there might be a bomb under the car.

The staff got out, and the police officer dropped to the ground to check underneath the vehicle. Suddenly, smoke and flames erupted from the car, and the police officer told the group to run before the engine exploded. The bank workers fled as quickly as they could, before turning to see the “policeman” driving away. A freshly used flare lay on the ground

The robber left 120 pieces of evidence behind, including the motorcycle. However, none of it was useful, and police eventually realized the random objects had been scattered on purpose to throw investigators off-course. The investigation itself was huge—170,000 officers looked into 110,000 suspects.

The statute of limitations passed in 1975 without anyone being caught, and the robber was free of civil liabilities after 20 years. He could legally sell his story and face no consequences, but no reliable claimant has ever come forward.

4The Stopwatch Gang

The all-Canadian three-man bank-robbing team known as the Stopwatch Gang were responsible for over 100 heists, with proceeds of over $15 million during the 1970s and ’80s. They earned their nickname because they used stopwatches to ensure they were never in a bank for more than two minutes. They could perform a robbery in as little 90 seconds.

They were famous for never needing to fire a shot. One of their first robberies, stealing $750,000 worth of gold bars from Ottawa Airport, was carried out by gang member Stephen Reid disguising himself as a baggage handler and simply walking out with the loot. They were caught for that crime, but when they left prison, they moved to the US and created new identities for themselves in Arizona. They told their neighbors they worked in entertainment and took regular business trips to California.

In total, they robbed over 140 banks. In true Hollywood style, it was their last big job, on which they hoped to retire, that got them caught. The gang customized a rented vehicle and spent weeks staking out and planning to steal a cash delivery at a Bank of America branch. On September 23, 1980, they took $283,000—but left a clue that led back to them. All of the gang were arrested. Stephen Reid was picked up on his way to the airport to get the plane he’d bought to leave the country and start his new life.

3The Argentinean Underground

07

Photo credit: CNN

On January 13, 2006, two men walked into Banco Rio in the Argentinean town of Acassuso. They took over 20 hostages. Two hundred police officers completely surrounded the building, but the robbers didn’t seem to mind. They exchanged four hostages for pizza and pop (which they shared with the other hostages) and sang “Happy Birthday” to one of the women they’d captured. In total, they were there for seven hours, before police stormed the building—and found the men had vanished along with $8 million worth of valuables.

Police found an iron lid covering a hole in the basement, bolted from underneath. When they removed it, they were led into a tunnel, which took the thieves into the sewers and out to the local river. The thieves had left a note saying they’d “stolen money, not love,” though many of the 140 safe deposit boxes they’d taken contained items of great sentimental value.

Though the thieves were caught and put on trial, robbing banks from underground seems to have caught on. On New Year’s Eve 2010, a group of robbers dug a 30-meter (100 ft) tunnel into Banco Provincia in Buenos Aires. They even included lights and ventilation. Alarms went off, put police didn’t bother to investigate beyond checking that the doors were shut. Only days later, when the bank reopened, did anyone realize a robbery had taken place.

2The Loughton Incinerator Thefts

08
The key to a brilliant plan is simplicity, as a worker at the Bank of England’s incinerator for worn-out banknotes found out in 1988. Over the course of four years, she stole £600,000 by stuffing the cash in her underwear.

A small group of employees acted as lookouts for main smuggler Christine Gibson, distracting the plant’s security guards. The notes were locked away in cages with two padlocks, black and white. Gibson only held the key for the black padlocks, but painted some of the keys white so she could remove both types without being detected. Since the notes were stolen from the secure lock-up immediately before they were thrown into fire, no one ever noticed the loss.

As with many criminals on this list, the theft itself wasn’t the undoing of Gibson’s gang. Her husband Peter drew attention when he went to a local building society to open an account, dumping a plastic bag full of rolled up notes out onto a table in front of the manager. Though plenty of people save cash, Gibson had brought in £100,000 in a carrier bag. Bank staff were suitably flabbergasted and called police. Officers raided the Gibsons’ home and unraveled the entire scheme.

Almost everyone involved in the thefts escaped criminal prosecution because witnesses were unwilling to talk to police. The lavish, unexplainable lifestyle of the low-paid staff wasn’t enough for a criminal trial. However, the Bank of England considered it enough to take civil action. They successfully sued three families for the return of the stolen cash—plus interest.

1The Art Thefts Of Stephane Breitwieser

09

Photo credit: The City Review

Perhaps the most prolific art thief in history, Stephane Breitwieser stole billions of dollars’ worth of art over the course of seven years. He took pieces from 172 different museums across Europe, storing them all at his mother’s house. He didn’t do it for money; he lived on his salary as a waiter in various European cities. He just really, really liked art.

Breitwieser‘s plan was simple. He visited museums and galleries with poor security. Breitwieser’s girlfriend acted as a lookout, and he removed items from their displays. He’d then hide them under his coat and walk out the front door.

He was eventually caught in 2001 trying to steal a 400-year-old bugle. Swiss police recognized him because he was targeting the museum for the second time. He’d already served eight months in the country for trying to steal a piece in 1998. Breitwieser was jailed and spent 26 months in prison.

The worst part of the story comes from the man’s mother. Mireille Breitwieser destroyed 60 items worth $1.4 billion when her son was arrested. She claimed to have been angry with him, but police believe she was trying to get rid of evidence.

When he got out of prison, Breitwieser decided he was finally ready to profit from his crimes: He published an autobiography.

source:by Alan Boyle

10 UNINTENTIONALLY HILARIOUS MILITARY INCIDENTS

in Rencana by
New Picture 427_thumb[2]
10 Unintentionally Hilarious Military Incidents
By Marc V.,
Listverse
Life in the military is serious business, thanks to all the risks involved in such a dangerous profession. However, as with all other jobs, funny moments do happen once in a while. The only difference is that in the military, hilarious blunders usually involve massive property damage or widespread loss of life.
10. The Belgian MiG-23 Crash

In what might be one of the strangest incidents to ever occur in aviation history, a Soviet MiG-23 fighter jet flew unmanned all the way from Poland to Belgium. Once it ran out of fuel, the plane hurtled into a home, killing a teenage occupant.
The fiasco began on July 4, 1989, when the pilot, Colonel Skurigin, saw the afterburner appear to fail during take-off. As the plane steadily descended, Skurigin believed the engine had completely shut down, so he ejected safely. To his surprise, however, the plane didn’t crash. Instead, it continued flying west on autopilot.
US fighter jets escorted the pilotless MiG during its flight over West Germany, eventually breaking off as it flew over the border. The French also put their own fighters on alert in case the rogue jet reached their airspace. As mentioned however, the MiG wound up crashing in Belgium instead.
In the aftermath, the Belgian government criticized their Soviet counterparts for their slow response to the situation and failure to inform them whether the jet possessed nuclear or biological weapons.
9. The Giant Battleship That Started A Flood
New Picture 427
Before American forces finally sunk it during the Battle of Leyte Gulf, the Japanese battleship Musashi was a menacing sight to behold. As one of the two largest and most powerful battleships ever built (the other one being her sister ship Yamato), the Musashi boasted a displacement of over 65,000 metric tons (72,000 tons) when fully armed and possessed 46-centimetre (18.1 in) guns with a range of nearly 37 kilometres (23 mi). In addition, the giant battleship bristled with myriad smaller guns, including as many as 150 anti-aircraft batteries.
Its massive size and weight, however, led the Musashi to unintentionally flood the city of Nagasaki during its launch in November 1940. The process of lowering the huge ship into the water caused a meter-high (3.3 ft) tsunami that flooded the surrounding residential areas and capsized nearby fishing boats.
Owing to the secretive nature of the launch, the Japanese military kept the flooded residents from leaving their homes. Fortunately for them, no further mishaps plagued the rest of the ship’s construction, which finally finished in August 1942.
8. The British Soldiers Who Got Drunk During An Invasion
New Picture 428
Photo credit: Emijrp/Wikimedia
As we’ve found out before, the British have their fair share of spectacular military blunders throughout history.
In an effort to regain lost glory and avenge the rude treatment their diplomats suffered in Spain, the British sent a force of 10,000-15,000 men on more than 80 ships to invade the Spanish city of Cadiz in 1625. Although terrifying on paper, the force consisted mostly of undisciplined men who had been pressed into service. It also didn’t help that their superiors brought hardly any supplies with them on the expedition.
Upon landing in Cadiz, the soldiers pilfered wine from the local vats in order to augment their rations. Afterward, they became so drunk that they threatened mutiny against their officers. The leader of the expedition, Sir Edward Cecil, ordered them all back to the ships but left behind 2,000 drunken men, whom the Spanish later executed. Of those who made it back to the ships, only half made it back home – a result of vicious weather plus poor living conditions.
7. The British Accidentally Invaded Spain In 2002
New Picture 429
Photo credit: Conti-Reisen
In 2002, two dozen British marines on a training exercise stormed a beach they mistakenly thought to be in Gibraltar. As it turned out, they came ashore on a beach resort in La Linea, Spain instead. The marines only realized their mistake after the locals and two policemen informed them they were in the wrong place.
The British later attributed the incident to bad weather and apologized for their error, a gesture which Spanish officials graciously accepted. In a parting shot, the locals wryly pointed out that Gibraltar shouldn’t be hard to miss since it had a 4,260-meter (1,400 ft) tall rock for a landmark.
To be fair to the British, they weren’t the only ones who mistakenly invaded a country. The famously defense-minded country of Switzerland also accidentally invaded its tiny neighbour Liechtenstein – not just once but three times. They even had to compensate Liechtenstein once when Swiss soldiers caused a forest fire.
6. The Brazilian Sailors Who Shot And Sank Their Ship By Mistake
New Picture 430
Photo credit: Brazilian Navy
Apparently, tales of people inadvertently sinking their own ships aren’t limited to the British or the Swedes.
With the European theatre of World War II drawing to a close, crew members of the Bahia a Brazilian cruiser stationed northeast of Brazil to protect Allied convoys – practiced a live-fire anti-aircraft drill using a kite towed behind the ship as the target. During the course of the exercise, the gunner accidentally hit a row of depth charges on the ship’s stern (the consequence of not placing guard rails to prevent the guns from firing so close to the ship).
Subsequently, the depth charges exploded and sank the ship in just a few minutes, forcing the crewmembers to bail out on lifeboats and endure almost a week out at sea. Of the more than 350 men aboard, only a few dozen survived, with four US Navy personnel among the dead.
5. The Confederates Interrupted Philip Sheridan’s Toast (And Paid Dearly)
New Picture 431
It’s suicidal to just charge a well-entrenched enemy on higher ground, but someone must have forgotten to tell Philip Sheridan in 1863. The Union general and his men had just secured the first line of Confederate trenches during the Battle of Missionary Ridge when he suddenly whipped out a flask and toasted the defenders high above the ridge.
The Confederates reciprocated his toast by shooting a few cannon rounds at him – a move that turned out to be a huge mistake. After lambasting the Confederates for their lack of good manners, Sheridan charged toward their positions up the slope.

To the relief of everyone, including Sheridan’s superior General Grant, the Union troops succeeded in overrunning the ridge and eventually winning the entire battle. As for Sheridan, he later celebrated his victory in true whimsical fashion: by riding a still-hot Confederate cannon.
4. Hannibal Caused An Avalanche With His Cane
New Picture 432
We remember Hannibal as one of history’s most successful tacticians, who proved to be more than a match for the Romans several times in his career. Hannibal’s military genius could be attributed to his unconventional strategies, such as crossing the Alps with his army in 218 B.C. However, according to the Roman historians Polybius and Livy, Hannibal made a critical mistake during his dangerous trek across the snow-capped mountains.
At one point, Hannibal’s army, which included several war elephants, came to an abrupt halt when they refused to walk across a certain path. Angry at this holdup, the Carthaginian general – who had been marching at the rear – came to the front and slammed his cane into the snow-covered path to show them it was solid and safe to cross.

Unfortunately, that act triggered a huge avalanche that ended up killing more than half of his 50,000 men and several of his elephants. It took four days for the survivors to escape the frozen carnage and finally descend below the Alps.

3. The BBC Spilled A Surprise British Attack To The Argentines
New Picture 433
The Battle of Goose Green, set during the Falklands War, would be remembered primarily for two things: as the first and most bloody land battle between the UK and Argentina and as the incident where the BBC opened its mouth too soon.
Secretly landing near the settlement, British soldiers had prepared for a surprise night attack on the Argentine forces when the BBC announced their plans to the world, the Argentines included. This angered the British commanding officers on the ground so much that one of them, Lt. Col. H. Jones, vowed to sue the BBC and the Ministry of Defense for treason. However, he pushed through with the operation in the hope that the Argentines would believe it was all a ruse to catch them off guard.
Jones’s hope proved to be well placed. The leader of the Argentine forces, Lt. Col. Italo Piaggi, believed the British wouldn’t be so stupid as to reveal their plans over public radio, so he did nothing to augment his defenses. The numerically inferior British ended up taking 1,400 Argentines as prisoners during the battle.
2. The Snarkiest ‘Confession’ Ever Written
New Picture 434
The “Hawaiian good luck sign” wasn’t the only way imprisoned members of the USS Pueblo undermined their North Korean captors’ propaganda. Their captain, Lloyd Bucher, also did his best to ridicule his tormentors.
Although initially resistant to write a “confession of wrongdoing,” even after enduring several beatings and mock executions, Bucher finally relented when the North Koreans threatened to kill his men before his very eyes. At this point, the captors thought they had broken Bucher – but they were dead wrong.
Taking advantage of the North Koreans’ cluelessness in English, Bucher wrote a confession letter in September 1968 filled with utter nonsense and dripping with sarcasm. The classic lines he wrote included “[we] paean (pee on) the Korean People’s Army Navy” and “we had traversed Operation Areas Mars, Venus, and Pluto so named because, like the planets, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is really far out.”
The North Koreans later released the men on December 23, 1968, without ever realizing Bucher had insulted them on so many levels.
1. The Ship That Almost Torpedoed FDR To Death
New Picture 435
Perhaps no other ship in the US navy can ever surpass the tragicomic history of the William D. Porter and its crew. Its unenviable resume included wrecking a sister ship with its anchor, friendly-firing another one, and accidentally shooting a live round into a base commander’s front yard. However, all these incidents paled in comparison to the time the William D. Porter almost assassinated the president of the United States.
In 1943, the ship, along with three other destroyers, had been assigned to guard the USS Iowa, which carried FDR and his Secretary of State Cordell Hull en route to the Tehran and Cairo Conference. During the trip, the William D. Porter caused a major scare when one of its depth charges accidentally fell to the water and exploded, causing the rest of the convoy to think U-boats had found them.
After that incident, the crew – in a training exercise – inadvertently launched an armed torpedo right at the USS Iowa. The big ship managed to dodge it just in the nick of time.
Although the William D. Porter did finally serve with distinction during the Philippine and Okinawa campaigns, the ship met a demise as bizarre as its mishaps. On June 10, 1945, a kamikaze plane it shot down dove underwater and exploded, sinking the vessel. Miraculously, all the crewmembers survived.
Top image via DVD Talk.

[Source: Listverse. Edited. Top image added.] / Alizul

Visit the strangest border in the world

in Berita Nasional/Rencana by
LP 40 London to Sydney 2013
by Oliver Smith

What happens when you mix the atmosphere of a World Cup final with an international boundary?

The answer, we found out today, is at the Wagah border – a crossing point between India and Pakistan. Every day at sunset, border guards from both sides face each other off in a marching routine in front of cheering supporters, before slamming the border gate shut for the night and lowering their flags.

The routine started as a display of aggression between two nations that have fought four wars, and that still keep nuclear weapons pointed at each other. But, today, the frontline in the Indo-Pakistani Cold War takes the form of a highly theatrical daily dance-off between the two countries at Wagah. Sporting twirly moustaches, soldiers from India and Pakistan mock-charge each other, swivelling on their heels like ballerinas, and kicking so high their shiny boots graze their foreheads. As someone from Britain, I find it hard to imagine an equivalent scenario back home – perhaps morris dancing boisterously in the middle of the Channel Tunnel?

We witnessed the ceremony from the Indian side ahead of a cricket match between the two countries, which made everyone even more excitable. There was a real party spirit – an MC happily played techno music and chants of ‘Long Live India!’ rang out in response to the cheers from the Pakistani side. There’s something gratifying about it for the spectators – like shouting abuse at a really annoying neighbour from behind the safety of a garden fence.

But there’s a bittersweet element to this. During the turmoil that followed the partition of British India in 1947, Muslim families from what is today the Republic of India relocated to what is now the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, with Hindu and Sikh families fleeing in the opposite direction. It was the biggest mass-migration in human history – whole communities were uprooted during partition, and families split down the middle.

At the end of the display, people from both sides barge their way to the closed border gate – a few test out their filthiest insults on each other. But, strangely, a bigger number stand quietly behind the railings, peering curiously at the countryside on the opposite side.

40 Ribu Pembohongan Haprak Pakatan Fitnah SPR.

in Berita Nasional/Rencana by
20130527-163903.jpg

40 ribu Bangla kononnya membanjiri pusat pengundian semasa hari mengundi, habis aparat pakatan bergelimpangan diatas jalan raya meroyan tak sudah kononnya kekalahan mereka akibat bantuan mat bangla keatas kerajaan BN.

Sebelum ini Pisau dedahkan pembohongan haprak pakatan menggunakan penyokong sendiri untuk berlakon sebagai Mat Bangla.Kemudian haprak pakatan menahan mana mana bas yang membawa pekerja asing ke tempat kerja dituduhnya mereka ini sebagai pengundi sedangkan tidak ada satu pun dibuktikan mat bangla yang ditahan mempunyai Mykad,ditahan semasa atau selepas membuang undi atau ditahan berbuktikan mat bangla jarinya mempunyai dakwat kekal!

Video dibawah menjadi bukti penjelasan daripada SPR sekali lagi haprak pakatan berbohong dan fitnah.Malangnya para pelahap kencing haprak pakatan kecanduan kepada fitnah maka bohong dan fitnah menjadi kelazatan menghalalkan cara .

Pisau kata ” untung DAP PAS PKR punyai penyokong sebodoh kaldai! kencing pun disangka air coke! “

New Economic Policy Suits Malaysia Best – Dr. Amy Chua

in Rencana by
NEP-e1276590399289

As Malaysia is now divided into two groups, one being Bumiputera and others, while the other is the Chinese, it is tough for us to mention anything without being labeled of being supporters of any groups.
When we explain on the rationality of the New Economic Policy and Bumiputera rights, the Chinese would label it as racist despite of all the facts given in the explanation.

 

When the Chinese insisted on defending Vernacular school, bumiputera protested because it only widen racial gap. Even though the arguments are factual, the Chinese still label those who went against vernacular schools as racist.
That is why, no one can really provide any opinion with no prejudice and accused by many sides, unless the person are not Malaysians.
These ‘outsiders’ should not be agents of higher power that wishes to control the world, instead, the ‘outsider’ should be those who are really neutral.
One of them include Dr. Amy Chua, a law lecturer from Yale University. She specializes in study of international trade transactions, law and development, ethnic conflict, and globalization and the law.
Born in the Philippines, Dr. Chua is a Chinese from the descendants of Hoklo which uses Hokkien dialect. She is raised in American after her family migrated there.
Other than lecturing, Dr. Chua also published a few books, they include World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. The book discusses about ethnic conflict in a society which a big part of the economy is controlled by a dominant minority ethnic.
The book is listed as the ‘Best Seller’ by New York Times and The Best Books of 2003 by the Economist as well as The Highest Read of 2003 by The Guardian.
In the book, Dr. Chua studied how globalisation and democracy since 1989 has been giving impact to the relationship between dominant minority and the majority. In the study, Dr. Chua concluded that the New Economic Policy introduced in Malaysia is the best for this country to ensure stability.
She considered background and history or the source of economic instability where it began since occupation. Those who occupied this country had exploited the economy of the original population and at the same time gave more chance to immigrants. This caused original population to be left behind in all sorts of field until they have no choice but to settle as farmers and coolie.
With that, she recognizes the New Economic Policy as the best way to tighten economic disparity between races other than developing unity and to wipe off poverty. The same policy also has proven that it had helped Malaysia achieve political stability as well as strong economic development. That is why, the New Economic Policy has been recognized and supported by the World Bank.
We need to remember that Dr. Chua did not speak on behalf of the Chinese, nor the government or even any races in Malaysia. She spoke as an academician and provided arguments and opinions based on facts.
She also clearly would not gain anything for supporting any side, other than the profit of her book sales.
Thus, the Chinese who love to question the NEP or Bumiputera rights should learn from this book. Put aside hate and pride of being in power for a while.
For once, learn how to think, like a mature being. Do accept the fact that NEP never cause any loss for the Chinese. It only helps other races to also compete with the Chinese.
With the status of Chinese which is far forward in the country’s economy, the Chinese couldn’t possibly get left behind. So, what is wrong with win-win?
It is now time for the Chinese to think like civilized men where living is not about material things. Don’t SJKC teach all this?
Malaysian Chinese should make Dr. Amy Chua’s book as their reference to understand the economic scenario in Malaysia before they demand for everything. Learn how to be polite and pick up some tolerance, just like any other normal being.
Are the Chinese willing to destroy the country just so that they can get suck out all the profit in Malaysia?

Malaysia Model Negara Islam

in Rencana by

Ketua Pembangkang, Anwar Ibrahim sering menjadikan negara timur tengah sebagai contoh sepanjang ceramah jelajah yang dilakukan, kerana dikatakan mempunyai rakyat yang berani untuk melalui gerakan ‘arab spring’. Malah nama mantan Perdana Menteri, Tun Mahathir juga seakan tidak lepas dari bibirnya apabila sering dihina dan dicerca dengan pelbagai kata-kata nista bagi mewujudkan sentimen kebencian rakyat.

Namun di sebalik kejian dan cacian itu, umum mengetahui dan maklum mengenai jasa Tun Mahathir sepanjang 22 tahun mengurus tadbir negara. Malah beliau juga merupakan tokoh yang berjaya membuka mata dunia untuk memandang Malaysia sebagai sebuah negara Islam yang berjaya berkembang maju pesat menandingi negara-negara mundur yang lain.

Dengan usaha yang dijalankannya, sudah pasti tidak semua yang senang dengan cara beliau yang mengamalkan ketegasan dan disiplin yang tinggi. Namun, dengan sikapnya yang tegas dan berdisiplin itulah beliau berjaya mengangkat taraf hidup dan memberi kesenangan kepada penduduk sejagat di negara ini.

Tidak menumpukan perkembangan ekonomi dan kemajuan negara sahaja, Tun Mahathir turut bertanggungjawab membawa naik nama Islam negara ini dan sekali gus menjadikannya sebagai tokoh Islam yang disegani dunia.

Oleh kerana itu, sehingga kini ramai yang mengagumi jasa dan ketegasan beliau ketika memerintah negara. Baru-baru ini, cara kepimpinan dan pemikiran Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad telah ditagih oleh pergerakan Islam terbesar di dunia Ikhwanul Muslimin untuk membantu menstabilkan Mesir, negara yang dikuasai oleh kumpulan tersebut.

Tun Mahathir diminta berucap dalam satu persidangan yang menghimpunkan berbagai golongan pembuat dasar di Mesir dan mendapat liputan luar biasa media dari seluruh negara Arab.

Ikhwanul Muslimin merupakan pergerakan Islam yang menjadi tenaga utama menumbangkan rejim Hosni Mubarak dan memenangi pilihanraya umum Mesir selepas itu.

Mereka menubuhkan satu parti politik yang dinamakan Parti Kebebasan dan Keadilan (FJP) yang diketuai oleh Presiden Mesir kini Mohamed Mosri.

Namun selepas dua tahun menerajui Mesir, keadaan di negeri yang mempunyai 80 juta penduduk itu masih juga gagal untuk distabilkan baik dari segi ekonomi mahupun politik.

Berikutan itu, Ikhwanul Muslimin telah menjemput tokoh-tokoh Islam utama dunia untuk memberikan pandangan mereka dan cadangan agar negara yang sedang bergolak itu kembali pulih seperti sedia kala.

Pada Ahad yang lepas, Tun Dr Mahathir yang cukup dikenali di dunia Islam sebagai peneraju pembangunan negara Islam yang sederhana dan maju selepas 22 tahun mentadbir Malaysia telah dijemput untuk berucap dalam satu majlis yang dihadiri oleh rata-ratanya pembuat dasar, ahli perniagaan dan politik Mesir.

Persidangan tersebut mendapat liputan luar biasa oleh media bukan sahaja dari Mesir bahkan dari seluruh dunia Arab. ?Dalam ucapannya Dr Mahathir mengajak kerajaan baharu Mesir mencontohi pengalaman Malaysia sebagai model dalam memacu kemajuan ekonomi di negara ini.

Secara jujurnya, beliau merupakan satu aset yang berharga buat negara kerana beliau mempunyai satu tahap pemikiran yang menjangkaui ke hadapan. Dengan mempunyai tokoh sebegini, rakyat seharusnya lebih bersyukur dan berterima kasih di atas apa yang berjaya di kecapi sekarang.

Sedangkan negara luar berebut untuk mendapatkan Tun Mahathir, tak mungkin kita di negara ini hanya mampu melihat dan membiarkan tokoh ilmuwan kita itu dibawa pergi. Terima kasih Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad kerana membawa Malaysia sehingga ke tahap ini.

Kesimpulan yang ingin disampaikan ialah, gerakan ‘arab spring’ yang sering menjadi kebanggaan Anwar bukanlah satu model yang terbaik untuk dicontohi oleh rakyat.

Ia bukan sahaja menyebabkan ekonomi negara musnah namun turut menyebabkan rakyat menjadi mangsa dan menanggung akibat yang buruk.

Kedua, walaupun Anwar cuba memburukkan Tun Dr Mahathir sebagai negarawan, namun masyarakat dunia nyata begitu menghargai tokoh yang sering dihina dan dicerca ini. Fikir-fikirkanlah.

Buy Malay First! SENARAI PRODUK KELUARAN BUMIPUTERA ISLAM

in Rencana by
BMF BCL
 Ekonomi Perut Terjajah : KLIK SINI dan Sebarkan
Sebarkan artikel artikel penting ini :KLIK SINI
SENARAI PRODUK KELUARAN BUMIPUTERA ISLAM
1. Roti – Gardenia (Syed Mokhtar Bukhary)
2. Minyak Masak -Tiara (FGV-FELDA)
– SAJI (FGV-FELDA)
– ALIF (Sime Darby)
– ADELA (FGV-FELDA)
3. Susu Pekat Manis – SAJI (FGV-FELDA)
– ALIF (Sime Darby)
4. Susu Cair – Saji (FGV-FELDA)
5. Mee Segera – SajiMee Saji (FGV-FELDA)
– ADABI
6. Beras – FAEZA
– Langsat Biru (JUARA SELERA –SG ACEH)
– Langsat Hijau (JUARA SELERA)
– Juara Selera
7. Garam – HALAGEL (garam bukit)
8. Kicap Masin/Manis – Kipas Udang
– Tamin
– ALIF (Sime Darby)
– Rohaya
– JALEN (Johor)
9. Sos Cili/Tomato/Tiram – ZUZA (Kedah)
– Rohaya
– ADABI
– Pelangi (FELDA)
10. Cuka Buatan – Mudim
– Rohaya
11. Tepung Gandum – FAEZA
12. Tepung Perasa/ Goreng – ADABI (tepun ayam)
– ADABI (tepung Cucur Ikan Bilis, jagung, udang)
13. Rempah Masak – ADABI, Brahim’s, FAEZA, AGROMAS, Imans
14. Kunyit – AGROMAS
15. Jagung Tin manis – ADABI
16. Pasta spaghetti – ADABI
17. Santan Paket – ALIF (Sime darby)
18. Taucu – JALEN, Tamin
19. Jus Pekat Buah2an – Tamin
20. Perasa Ros Sirap – Rohaya, Tamin
21. Mayonis -Mayo Saji (FELDA)
22. Marjerin – Pelangi Delima Oil(FELDA)
23. Sos Tomato Pelangi (FELDA)
24. Jem – Peanut SunBear (FELDA)
– Jem Strwaberry – AGROMAS
25. Kopi 3-in-1 – ADABI-Tongkat Ali Cordyceps (5-in-1)
i. -Kopi HANG TUAH (2-in1, 2-in-1)
26. Biskut Coklat – GOODKISS (Noraini’s Cookies)
27. Frozen Daging Burger/ Nugget – RAMLY, NAFAS, AYAMAS
28. Sardin Agromas
29. Sardin Pertima
30. Bihun Sufi
31. Mi Kuning Sufi
32. Kuey Teow Sufi
33. Garam Sufi
34. Sos Lada Hitam Sufi
35. Sos Cili/Tomato Sufi
36. Kicap Masin/Manis Sufi
37. Tepung Goreng Sufi
38. Minyak Masak Sufi
39. Telur Cap Sufi
40. Ubat gigi Najwa
41. Ubat gigi Halagel
42. Tepung gandum Cap Bidara
43. Jus minuman Safina
44. Syampoo D’herbs
45. Bihun Kampung
46. Rempah- Imans
47. Rempah-Brahim’s
48. Bihun- FAEZA
49. Jeruk Buah2an- jenama PAK ALI
50. Kedai Kasut Sukan – ALIKHSAN
51. Kuah Rojak/Garam Belacan – ZUZA, PAK ALI, FAMA
52.Alatulis jenama k’didi
MILIK CINA BUKAN ISLAM
– ROTI MASSIMO
-ROTI Hi5 – SILVER BIRD (kek, pelbagai jenis roti perisa)
-BERAS JATI – SERBA WANGI
-BIHUN JATI
-BIHUN eCOBrown
-BERAS RAMBUTAN
-FROZEN- SAUDI burger, nugget, potatoes
-KOSMETIK – SAFI
-BIHUN EKA-FATIMA
-KOPI-SUPER POWER KOPI
-MUNCHY’S BISCUITS
-MINYAK MASAK SERI MURNI (FFM-Robert Kuok Group)
– SRI MURNI nugget
-MARINA Nugget
-MARINA Tune
– PowerRoot Ali Cafe
– PowerRoot Oligo Cereal
– PowerRoot 9SPOT ISOTONIK
– Malta
– NutriMalt
– Teh Cap Masjid
– Teh Guru Cap Masjid
– Old Town White Coffee
– Minyak masak Knife
– Minyak masak Cap Buruh
– Minyak masak Naturel
– Minyak masak Daisy
– Drinho ALL DRINKS
– YOE’s All drinks
– Isomax Isotonic
– HomeSoy
– Farm Crows Butter
– Pasaraya EconSave
– Pasaraya KK mart
– Pasaraya 99 SpeedMart
– Pasaraya Billion
– Pasaraya Pacific
Company BAS EKSPRES juga banyak Melayu Punya:
1. Transnasional (group of Nadi Corp-Dato Nadzmi)
2. MARA Liner (MARA)
3. COSMIC
4. SANI Ekspres
5. ETIKA
6. JELITA (Jelita Transtours)
7. Pancaran Matahari
8. Durian Burung
9. Ekspres Perdana
10.AB Ekspres
11. Mutiara Ekspres
12. Mahligai Ekspres
13. Shamisha Ekspres
14. Utama Ekspres

 

ada beberapa lagi yg company bumi tp tak pasti kesahihan untuk listed

 

TOLONG ELAK NAIK COMPANY CINA HARBI PUNYA

 

-Konsortium Ekspres
-KKKL Ekpsres (TRANS Lim-nama pun tau dh)
-FIVE STAR
-TranStar
-KL-Genting Ekspres
-Yakin BG/Bukit Gantang Ekspres
-S&S Ekspres
-Eagle Ekpres
-SE Super
– Antar Holiday
– Boon Best
sumber:GAP
update:
Kleenex®, Scott® , Huggies®, Kotex® – ini merupakan barangan yang diedar oleh Kimberley Clark yang dimiliki 100% orang cina. Dulu ada kilamg di Kulai, Johor tetapi telah berpindah ke Singapura. Tiada pekerja melayu berjaawatan tinggi, hanya customer service. Namum pelanggan utama adalah Melayu

Produk Makanan 100% Halal
Kami menawarkan pelbagai barangan makanan Segar & Sejuk Beku (FRESH & FROZEN) 100% HALAL :
• Sayur-sayuran Segar
• Ikan / Makanan Laut (fq slices, shrimp)
• Ayam / Daging Lembu (chicken parts- isi ayam, chicken chop, chicken wing, chicken drumstick, paru, daging/ayam kisar)
• Lamb / Kambing (fq slices, lamb shoulder – NZ/Aus, carcas)
• Buah-buahan
• Barangan kering; ie Confectionery, Cereal, Dairy & beverages, Telur dan lain-lain
• Detergent; ie Dishwash, Bleach, Floor Cleaner, Handwash
• Disposable Item; ie Plastics, Containers, Cups, Plates, Tissues, etc

Khidmat penghantaran terus dan sedia untuk kegunaan institusi penyediaan makanan; i.e hotel, restoran, cafe, kantin, catering dan lain-lain.

Area Khidmat Penghantaran: KL, PJ, Subang, Shah Alam

~Cost Savings Solution for Institutional Foodservice, Hotel, Restaurants and Cafes~

Hubungi kami di:
Aquaridz Fresh & Frozen
Contact person: En Khairul +60132470100
Email add: aquaridzzy@gmail.com

 

Bagi sesiapa berminat untuk mendapatkan tepung gandum bidara sebelah utara, boleh hubungi kami. Ridhwan 0175681134 .

Rujukan FB kami : https://www.facebook.com/wandiahent

Apakah Evangelis Kristian Benar-benar Jujur Hendak Guna Kalimah Allah?

in Rencana by

A Karim Omar – Puak-puak evangelis Kristian masih ingin menegakkan benang yang basah. Mereka masih berkeras menyatakan bahawa penggunaan kalimah Allah untuk terjemahan istilah God adalah satu keperluan. (Saya telah ulaskan bahawa terjemahan tersebut adalah tersasar dari segi kaedah peristilahan di sini: klik untuk baca).

Niat sebenar puak-puak evangelis berbohong untuk mengguna kalimah Allah bagi terjemahan kepada istilah “God” telahpun didedahkan sendiri oleh majalah mereka Christianity Today yang berpusat di Chicago, Amerika Syarikat. Mereka dengan jelas mengatakan bahawa penggunaan kalimah Allah adalah suatu usaha strategik untuk menipu umat Islam agar terkeliru untuk membaca bahan-bahan bacaan Kristian. (baca di sini: Kenapa Evangelis Kristian Risau Apabila Lagu Agnes Monica Diharamkan?).

Untuk kiriman ini saya ingin dedahkan pula apakah puak-puak evangelis ini benar-benar jujur hendak mengguna nama suci Allah itu. Apakah mereka benar-benar percaya bahawa nama yang sepatutnya untuk Tuhan mereka adalah Allah? Apakah mereka akan benarkan pula penganut Islam yang telah tertipu oleh mereka itu berterusan mengguna nama suci Allah apabila telah murtad dan mengamal agama Kristian?

allah-changed1Majalah Christianity Today keluaran Januari-Februari 2013 telah mendedahkan sepasang suami isteri Islam telah ditipu dan berjaya dimurtadkan serta percaya bahawa Tuhan dalam agama Kristian juga bernama Allah. Laporan majalah tersebut menyebut bahawa akhirnya mereka berterusan mengguna nama suci Allah (seperti dalam ucapan Alhamdulillah dan Insha Allah) apabila telah murtad dan masuk agama Kristian.

Maka pada suatu hari, mereka bertemu kembali dengan paderi yang telah memperdayakan mereka untuk murtad. Maka paderi itu bertanya khabar kepada mereka.

One day the pastor came to me and said, “How are you?” I answered, “Alhamdulillah!” (“Praise be to God!”). The pastor was very angry. He said, “No, brother! No more Alhamdulillah. Your God is changed from Allah to God [using the tribal name]. You have to express your thanksgiving to God as a Christian …

Terjemahannya:

Suatu hari paderi tersebut datang berjumpa saya dan berkata, “Awak apa khabar?” Saya menjawab, “Alhamdulillah!” (“Segala puji kepada Allah!”). Paderi tersebut sangat marah. Dia mengatakan, “Tidak, saudara! Tidak lagiAlhamdulillah. Tuhan awak sudah bertukar dari Allah ke Tuhan [dengan mengguna nama Tuhan dalam istilah bahasa tempatan]. Awak perlu menyatakan kesyukuran awak kepada Tuhan sebagai seorang Kristian …

Dengan JELAS dan TERANG, sememangnya paderi tersebut menipu. Dan ini membuktikan bahawa sememangnya puak-puak evangelis ini MENIPU hanya untuk memperdayakan umat Islam dalam tuntutan mereka untuk mengguna nama suci Allah itu.

PENIPUAN dan KEJAHATAN puak-puak evangelis ini semakin ketara apabila majalah mereka sendiri mendedahkan bahawa sebenarnya mereka tidak mahu guna nama suci Allah untuk tujuan nama Tuhan mereka. Malah majalah tersebut mendedahkan lagi bahawa mereka AMAT BENCI dengan nama Allah itu.

Ini yang disebut lagi dalam perenggan yang sama:

He asked me to not use the term Allah because Allah is evil, Allah is the Devil, Allah is the black stone, Allah is an idol.

Terjemahannya:

Dia (paderi itu) melarang saya guna kalimah Allahkerana Allah jahat, Allah adalah Syaitan, Allah adalah batu hitam (Kaabah), Allah itu adalah berhala.

KEBENCIAN puak-puak evangelis ini terhadap nama suci Allah ini sungguh jelas sekali apabila mereka menghina Allah.

PERSOALAN POKOK, jika mereka sungguh bencikan nama suci Allah ini mengapa mereka menuntut hendak gunanya?

BUKTI dari bahan Kristian sendiri mendedahkan kebencian dan kesumat mereka terhadap nama suci Allah. Tetapi kerana tujuan untuk MENIPU dan memperdayakan umat Islam mereka tuntut penggunaan kalimah Allah. Dan fenomena ini nampak jelas bukan sahaja berlaku di Malaysia.

Inilah asas penyebaran kepalsuan ajaran Kristian yang berlandaskan menipu orang untuk masuk agama mereka dan terjerumus sama dalam api neraka selama-lamanya.

Kod Rahsia dan Juga Peranan Kuasa Asing Bersama Pakatan .

in Berita Nasional/Rencana by

Anwar sekarang ini cukup gelabah apabila gagal untuk menjadi PM,janji beliau kepada paymaster  PRU13 beliau mampu ambil alih Putrajaya. Anwar dikenali ramai dengan hubungan rapat dengan Amerika,Pelobi yahudi dan turut menerima sumbangan kewangan ratusan juta .

Ramai dibutakan untuk nampak akan kebenaran dek termakan dengan hasutan kebencian dan fitnah. Kalangan haprak pakatan hanya meyokong membabi buta tanpa menyedari mereka juga sudah menjadi alat kuasa asing untuk menakluk negara.Perbezaan idiologi politik itu biasa,tetapi khianat dan menjadi petualang menghancurkan kedaulatan negara harus ditentang oleh setiap rakyat Malaysia.

hasut

Anwar Jemput Amerika Pulihkan Demokrasi Malaysia Dengan Peperangan


Video dibawah bukti seluruh penyokong pakatan tidak sedar mereka dipergunakan oleh agenda asing…Bukti cukup jelas apabila kita boleh nampak gelagat Anwar yang mahukan Amerika campur tangan didalam politik negara kita.Siapa lagi beliau mahu mengadu kalau bukan paymasternya sendiri…

LAPORAN RINGKAS TANGAN GHAIB DAN KOD RAHSIA

1 . Maklumat mengenai kod-kod tarikh yang dikeluarkan oleh pihak pembangkang kepada rakyat Malaysia berkait dengan kegiatan atau aktiviti ‘hidden hand’ di Malaysia.

anwar112. kod yang digunakan adalah tarikh dan merujuk terus kepada kod warna pakaian semasa revolusi jalanan

3. Kod : 505, 105 , 135, 508 , 510
505 – 5 mei- pilihanraya PRU13
805 – 8 mei – perhimpunan anwar di kelanajaya
105 – 10 mei
135 – 13 mei
508 – 5 ogos

510 – 5 oktober

5054. Perhimpunan revolusi melalui jalanan (non violent war) ini telah di asaskan oleh Gene Sharp. Mereka menggunapakai 198 modul operandi yang telah digariskan oleh Gene Sharp untuk diaplikasikan di Malaysia, antaranya :

1) Perhimpunan Jalanan
2) Duduk Bantah
3) Baring Diatas Jalanraya
4) Berkhemah Di Dataran Merdeka
5) Memberi Bunga Kepada Pengawai Keselamatan
6) Demontrasi
7) Membuat Huru Hara di Kawasan Bandar
) Menggunakan Logo Berlambang ‘Tangan’ (BERSIH)
9) Menggunakan Perkataan ‘occupy’
10) Warna Kod Pakaian (BERSIH – KUNING, ANTI LYNAS – HIJAU, TUKAR – MERAH)
5. 198 cara yang digariskan Gene Sharp boleh dirujuk di sini: http://www.aeinstein.org/organizations103a.html
Video dibawah adalah bukti…sebarkan sebanyak mungkin kepada setiap rakyat Malaysia!

 

 

Pisau kata “Moga Allah selamatkan Malaysia dari haprak pakatan”

PRU 13 Dedah PKR Boneka Kuasa Asing

in Rencana by

Pilihanraya Umum ke-13 (PRU 13) mendedahkan mempunyai unsur-unsur yang melengkapkan hipotesis bahawa Pakatan Rakyat khususnya PKR adalah kakitangan asing yang bekerja untuk menukar rejim demi faedah Amerika Syarikat (AS).

Pendapat itu diutarakan oleh Ruhanie Ahmad, doktor falsafah dalam geo-politik dan kajian keselamatan dalam satu forum di Universiti Malaya hari ini, lapor Malaysiakini.

Menurut Ruhanie, AS telah merasa ‘sakit’ dengan Malaysia yang telah menyekat kawalan di Selat Melaka, jadi mereka memerlukan seorang pemimpin proksi yang berpihak kepadanya.

“Jika mereka boleh mengawal (Selat Melaka), mereka boleh mengangkut tenaga dari Timur Tengah ke Asia Timur.

“Kawalan sumber tenaga dan pengangkutan laluan akan membuat Amerika Syarikat kuasa besar utama,” katanya.

Pendapat Ruhanie hampir sama dengan pendapat Profesor Dr Chandra Muzaffar, bekas Timbalan Presiden Keadilan dan Tony Cartalucci, penyelidik geopolitik yang berpusat di Thailand.

Cartalucci dalam pendedahannya bertajuk “Malaysia: Failure of U.S. to Subvert the Elections and Install a “Proxy Regime” berkata kemenangan Barisan Nasional pimpinan Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak merencatkan perencanaan AS melantik ‘Proksi Regim’ di Malaysia.

Menurutnya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Bersih dan Merdeka Center adalah proksi kuasa asing yang berselindung di sebalik tema ‘kebebasan’, bagi meluaskan pengaruh Amerika Syarikat (AS) khususnya untuk mengimbangi kuasa China di rantau ini.

Katanya, Anwar serta NGO terbabit berjaya mempengaruhi rakyat yang mahukan ketelusan, serupa dengan taktik yang digunakan oleh syarikat pengeluar rokok.

Katanya, seperti syarikat pengeluar rokok yang akhirnya menyebabkan jutaan kematian perlahan dan menyakitkan, perkara-perkara yang diperjuangkan oleh Anwar serta NGO proksi kuasa asing itu akan menyebabkan bencana kepada Malaysia.

“Ketika Anwar dan pakatan pembangkang menggunakan platform antirasuah, kempen itu sebenarnya serupa dengan slogan Barat untuk menggulingkan kerajaan di seluruh dunia melalui politik seperti di Venezuela dan Rusia pada 2012.

“Di Rusia, pemerhati pilihan raya ‘bebas’ iaitu pertubuhan Golos sebenarnya ditaja sepenuhnya oleh Jabatan Negara AS melalui ‘National Endowment for Democracy’ (NED), sama seperti Merdeka Center di Malaysia yang juga ditaja secara terus oleh AS melalui NED.

“Di sebalik semua ini, pertubuhan-pertubuhan media Barat mempromosikan pakatan pembangkang di Malaysia yang mendapat sokongan Barat dengan seringkali merujuk Merdeka Center sebagai ‘bebas’,” katanya

Artikel itu disiarkan di laman web Global Research kelmarin, milik Pusat Penyelidikan Globalisasi yang berpangkalan di Canada.

Menurut Cartalucci, hasrat sebenar kuasa asing melalui Anwar dan pembangkang adalah untuk menyaksikan Malaysia tunduk kepada model dasar luar dan perdagangan bebas AS.

“Kerana kebodohan itu, Malaysia mungkin perlu membayar harga yang mahal satu hari nanti – tetapi bagi Anwar dan pembangkang, mereka telah kalah dalam PRU-13 dan ‘lapisan mempromosi demokrasi’ ala AS ‘yang digunakan pembangkang) kini semakin tertanggal.

“Hubungan antara pakatan pembangkang diketuai Anwar dengan Jabatan Negara AS tidak terhenti setakat Merdeka Center tetapi turut merangkumi Bersih yang kononnya memperjuangkan pilihan raya adil dan bebas. Secara realiti, Bersih digunakan Anwar untuk menggerakkan protes jalanan,” katanya. -AIDC

Muslim lawyers see red over Christian ‘Allah’ prayer poster on Facebook

in Rencana by

An evangelical church group’s Facebook message calling Christians to pray for “Allah’s blessings” on the country has riled up a group of Muslim lawyers who are demanding state Islamic bodies act against what they have branded a “criminal” offence against their creed.

The Muslim Lawyers Society of Malaysia (PPPMM) today accused the National Evangelical Christian Fellowship of Malaysia (NECF) of committing “criminal” blasphemy against Islam by misappropriating the name of the Islamic god for their purposes, even as the dispute is being heard in the Court of Appeal.

allah-may14

Screenshot of the NECF Facebook page.“It is an offence for any party to deliberately and continuously use Allah and a few other words with roots from Islam in the context of a non-Islamic religious for any purpose.

“The NECF poster that has clearly misused the sacred name of Allah is obviously a criminal action and breaches the Schedule of (Section 9) Part I of the Enactment that forbids the use of the name of Allah as well as other Islamic terms by non-Muslims,” PPPMM president Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar said in a statement.

While the Federal Constitution upholds the right to freedom of religion, nearly all of the 13 states have enacted legislation that allows for control and restriction of the propagation of non-Islamic religions.

The law cited by Zainul refers to a list of words, which the respective state Islamic authorities deem strictly forbidden to be associated with a non-Muslim religion.

For example, Terengganu, which was the first state to enact the state law in 1986, forbids non-Muslims from spreading their religion using 22 words such as Allah, ulama, injil, fatwa, mufti, dakwah, rasul and even mubaligh.

Claiming to have received numerous complaints from various non-governmental Islamic organisations, Zainul urged the respective state Islamic departments and councils to file police reports to pressure the government to act against the church.

In its Facebook page, the umbrella body representing the country’s evangelical churches urged, in the national language, all churches and Christians to “embrace, love and bless the country with Allah’s presence and power”.

The same message was also carried in English and Chinese.

Under a project it called “Malaysia My Home”, the NECF urged believers in the faith to put prayer and action together for God’s blessing to institute “real and lasting change for our communities”.

The message also called on Christians to “get to know the people around you” and to “extend help to those in need”.

The message was posted on May 9 — four days after Malaysia’s hotly contested 13th general election and in which the results have fractured society.

A High Court had in 2009 ruled that the Catholic Church had the right to publish the word “Allah” in the Bahasa Malaysia section of its newspaper, Herald, as the Arabic word was not exclusive to Islam, contrary to the belief of many Muslim Malaysians.

Issues concerning religion and race in this country of 28 million, where 60 per cent are constitutionally defined as Malay and Muslim, touch a nerve and have sparked violence in the past, leading to attacks on several places of worship nationwide in 2010 following the landmark judgment.

The Home Ministry is appealing High Court judgment and the Court of Appeal is currently hearing an appeal by several state Islamic councils to intervene in the case as well.

Hearing for intervention is set to resume on May 23.

 

Pisau kata ” Terima Kasih PAS!”

Ethnic Han (chinese)-Malaysian, please wake up from our ancestors’ grievance and deparis!

in Rencana by

whatelsewhatelse

马来西亚汉裔同胞,从我们祖先哀怨和悔恨的沉睡中醒起来吧-

(Preface – This article was originally written by me fully in Mandarin. However i have not gathered enough courage to publish the mandarin version, having anticipated attacks from Chinese Chauvinists in Malaysia. I’ve seek many advices from wise people before putting my thoughts together in this issue. In the spirit of Malaysia, I shall put forth this to you. I dedicate this to every Malaysian, especially our brothers and sisters from different races and ethnicity.)

– “I was listening to a song by the name of 黄河怨 (Grievance of the Yellow River). The wordings of the song reflected the grievance and mourning by the widows and children of chinese men who went on to fight the japanese. The wordings of the song was painful. they were saddening, and full of regrets.”


1) The Great Divide – of Northern and Southern Chinese Immigrants

Being a chinese malaysian/ Han Malaysian, when you know another new Han Malaysian friends by their name, you would then supplement another question that other races wouldn’t common asked : “What is your dialect clan”?

are you a hokkien? are you a cantonese, are you a hakka, are you a fuchiew, are you a TiewChew, are you a hainamese, or are you a Kwongxi?

many wouldn’t go all the way to ask if you are a kwongxi.

Had it occur to you, that NO ONE ever asked, if you’re a : Shanghainese, SiChuanese, BeiJingnese, Nanjingnese, HeBei, ?

During the last Dynasty and the reign of the last Manchurian Emperor Pu-Yi, with the influences and bullying by the 8 foreign-alliances on China (八国联军), as well as persistent civil war lead by Dr Sun-Yat Sen, many Han Chinese, who forms the majority of the Chinese population couldn’t bear it any longer. They were living in absolute poverty and were suffering from impoverishment. Deep inside their guts, they couldn’t swear absolute loyalty to their king, who were of a different ethnicity from north – the ethnic manchuria, who practices distinct culture from the ethnic han from almost every aspect.

Northern Chinese were commonly known as the 官人 (the rich/upper class). If you trace the english word “MANDARIN”, it came from the ancient Sanskrit connotation of “MENTRI/MENTERI”, which means “of the upper class”. Mandarin, was known as the “dialect of the northern upper class”. People who speaks Mandarin dialect, were the beijing officials from north. – I will elaborate further on this later.

Southern Chinese, like the Hokkiens, FUchiew, Hainamese, albeit adhering to the same writing system, spoke it differently. THese are the farmers, petty merchants, or commonly perceived as the “lower class” among the ethnic Hans. They long succumbed to the fate that northerner who speaks the upper class dialect (官语)-which later was known as the “mandarin” dialect are far more superior and richer.

living through poverty under the last ching dynasty, and severe instablity during the Nationalist Party’s Reign under Yuan Shi Kai, many Chinese decided to leave the country.

Don’t get it wrong here however.

The northern Chinese left China, with the intention of leaving it for good. they are comprised of the the poor, but mostly the rich. These people fearing that their assets would not survive through persistent civil warfare and lateron, the world war two, brought everything along with them to “better places”, such as the USA and Europe.

The southern Chinese however, were “less” affected by the political instability, not being located in the crux of the game of thrones as much as the northerner. They, on the other hand, were those who seeked to “Change” the fate of their family. With that in mind, they went down south, as brought and offered by the British, to the Nusantara. (British was one of the 8 country alliances that dictated alot of china’s politics).

They were brought in as Miner, labourer, and petty merchants to Nusantara countries, in order to work for the colonial masters’ economical favour.

They were clinging on the hope that one day, upon gathering enough wealth, they could bring back their wealth here to China, and change the lifestyle of their Family in China. Some came alone, leaving their wive and children. Many others, bring along their immediate family members.

They suffered through the difficult passages to commute down south through massive ships, squeezing into the cramped little room for 1 month with technically minimal hygene provisions, just to get their way to Malaya.

They, were our ancestors.

__________________________________________________________

2.) Do you know that most of your ancestors do not speak the language you are speaking now?

MY grandgrandmother Chan Seong Lan, who died 3 years ago at the age of 105, was one of the migrants. I had the privileged of hearing 1st hand experience from her regarding her journey. Granny Chan came from TeowChiew.

When i was young, I had terrible communication problem with granny Chan. I spoke mandarin eloquently. but She doesn’t. She speaks perfect Hakka and Teow Chiew, but never mandarin. To be honest, I’ve never heard she uttered a single mandarin phase. (what made me proud was that her MALAY was really good. She always “sembang” with the lady who sell laksa in front of her house, so i was told).

Our ancestors came down to Malaya with their dialect and language. they were very ignorant over the mandarin dialect (common acknowledge as a “language” in modern days). They do not even think that there was a need to learn mandarin. Most of their culutral practices and behavours were defined by their dialects, such as the Hokkiens and Teow Chiews’ “Pai Ti Gong” ceremony on the 9th day of Lunar New Year or the Hakka’s food like “Son Pan Zi”, “Hakka teoh Fu” etc.

They came in with the simple thoughts of gathering Money, and bring it back to China so that it would benefit their relatives and family up in China. If you still have relatives above the age of 85, do ask them if they have siblings in China, and why didn’t they go back to reconcile and reunite with them. we shall explore “why” they didn’t go back in the next discussion.

_________________________________________________________
3.) Our ancestors who wanted to go back to China, did not go back. Why?

As mentioned above, their main reason of coming down to Malaya/other south east asian country, was not to settle down permanently, unlike the northern Chinese who migrated to Europe or the US.

Our Ancestors taught us a thousand year old virtue, of ” Ru Xiang Sui Su 入乡随俗“ ( if you’re in another foreign/alien land, you assimilate or integrate into the culture and practices of that society). “Ru Xiang Sui Su” was the guiding principle of the chinese who wanted to permanently migrate into a new society. You see the American Chinese migrant adapting Christian name, going to US schools, reading their news papers (of course you still have chinese circulation or chinese food in China town, which will be discussed later – as in the comparison between the china town of chinese who wanted to settle down in new society permanently, and the china town of Malaysia, former are likened to be a “remembrance” of their root, later is just a facade). The Chinese in Europe too incorporated into the european culture fairly quickly, where they won’t be satisfied until their english is rich of British Accent. They did not forget their root nontheless of being ethnic chinese/han, but in terms of lifestyle and routine, they’ve assimilated and integrated into the society they’ve migrated to. You see that in places like Japan, Korea, or Thailand too for that matter.

However, this virtue of “Ru Xiang Sui Su” did not apply to southern chinese who’ve migrated to Malaya. This is simply because they never wanted to stay permanently.

Furthermore, the fact that our ancestors started Chinese school in early 1900, (first being Foon Yew High School in Johor) , started of Chinese Press (Kwong Wah Jit Poh, which is much earlier than Utusan) proved the irrebutable fact that our Ancestors WANTED to ensure that their next generation to be “well equipped” with the Chinese language and culture/customs, so that when they are back in China they would be able to adapt into the norms/culture in China easily. Chinese who migrated with the intention to permanently settled down in a foreign country, never started chinese school or chinese press in the scale that our ancestors did. Back then, Chinese school was not unified. You have Penang’s “Fu Jian High School”, which conducts it’s lesson in Hokkien (currently, renamed “Penang Chinese Girl School/ Bin Hwa High School”). The name of the chinese schools also pretty much reflect on our ancestor’s “reminder” of the fact that their presence in Malaya was temporary. you have “中华CHONG HWA”. Chong Hua is the abbreviation of the “Chong hua/ tiong hua” race (not ethnic), which then is another rephase of the term 中土大园的华夏民族 (the Hua Xia (deepest root of the chinese) race from the main land ground). Contrary to popular believe, Chong Hua is not derived from China’s Full Name “中华人民共和国“’s “Zhong hwa”. in fact, both China’s name, and CHinese School’s name in Malaya derived from the first root of Chinese race (again, not ethnic Han), which is the “Main colossal Land’s Hua Xia race 华夏 race).

what was the reason that they then stayed permanently?

If you read my previous blog post of “bumiputra, for non-bumiputra” —-> Linkhttps://www.facebook.com/taizeekin/posts/10151559295110306 you would have realized that they CAN’T go back to China, against their desire.

soon after they came down, the world war two started. japanese invaded China, and there were civil war in CHina between the Communist fraction and the Nationalist fraction. Fact that Dr Sun Yat Sen started off his revolutionism from Penang, before recapturing China from the last manchurian emperor shows how deep an affinity between the CHinese in Malaya and China (of course he got his later funding from alot of oversea chinese in europe and USA as well, but he started in Penang, Malaysia).

Our Ancestors had NO CHOICE to go back to china and reunite with their siblings, family and loved one. As soon as the war ends, Communist party defeated Nationalist party lead by Chiang Kai Sek, and practiced “Close Door Policy”. the Whole china, like North Korea, was sealed. No one was to enter and no one was to leave (technically).

Malaysian ethnic Han/Chinese will have no choice, but to negotiate for a settlement plan. They GRIEVE and MOURNE over the fact that they could no longer go back and reunite with their family in mainland China. But settlement in Malaya, was never meant to be perpetually. That’s why they actually agreed to alot of terms that were seemingly compromising meritocracy on their part, but INSIST on venacular education. (read my previous blog above for an understanding about citizenship en mass). Venacular education, is the ONLY way they can ensure that their descendant like you and me, would be able to converse in our native mother tongue used in China, so that we could adapt the China’s society when we’re back.

The GRIEVANCE and MOURNING were then inscribed in our blood, and as a matter of fact, in the Federal Constitution right to vernacular education was guarenteed as a result of the “great trade off”. the native nusantarian had no problem giving citizenship to assimilated Chinese/Indian/Europeans as long as they do not withhold their loyalty to their country of origin. Much to the malay’s dismay, the chinese back then had almost all loyalty, in my humble opinion to China. Those who choose to assimilate would then be known as “peranakans”, who speaks and behave like native nusantarian. the nusantarian would treat them as part of them. But because of the technical definition of them being “Chinese”, they were bound by the faith of the 1st Generation Chinese Migrant unfortunately. The Seranis (eurasians) were not included in the “CHinese/INdian” package deal in the constitution. they assimiliated into the Nusantarian culture and was accepted. Again if you want to attack on this point, do read my previous blog first (Bumiputra, for non-bumiputra —>https://www.facebook.com/taizeekin/posts/10151559295110306 )

Therefore It’s suffice to say that Our ancestors, who wanted to prepare their next generation to go back in their stead (they couldn’t because of the close door policy and world war two), instilled in our blood the “Legacy” of mandarin, the very gateway language to go back to China.

_____________________________________________________________

4.) Chinese School : To protect the 5000 years old culture and knowledge, or its just about the language as our Ancestor’s legacy to become a gateway to go back to China?

I used to ask my friends from Chinese school, independent, UEC, or SMJK, on why would they go to Chinese School INstead of an ordinary National School.

i got 3 kinds of answers.

a.) The Chauvinistic answers
– Chauvinist (沙文主义) would tell me that it’s our duty to protect the 5000 years old wisdom and culture. thats why we have to send our children to chinese school.

what these chauvinists failed to convince me, is how going to chinese school would ensure that they would protect the 5000 years old history, culture and knowledge?

– I asked them, do you know the “Si Shu Wu Jing (四书五经), the four main literature and 5 great mantras of the chinese. They couldn’t even quote me the title of the 9 most important literature work of the chinese literature.

– I asked them, do you know the different school of thoughts between the confusionism 儒家思想, taoism 道家思想,or Mahayanian Buddhism 大乘佛理. they couldn’t even distuingshih religion rituals and philosophical ideology behind the Chinese Culture-based religion

– I asked them, of the 4 great dishes in Chinese Culture, 四大名菜,京菜,粤菜,闽菜,and 川菜 (Beijing culinery culture, Cantonese culinery culture, Fu Jian culniery culture, and sichuan culinery culture) , how many dishes can they name? they couldn’t even name ONE.

– I asked them, do you know the different between our Ethnic Han’s tranditional costume, the HAN FU (汉服) and the Manchurian Bannerman’s CHEONG SAM/ KEI PO (长衫, 旗袍,旗服) ? they thought that our traditional costume was Cheong Sam/ Kei fuk / Kei pou ), which was a disgrace to our ancestors. we were ethnic HAN with HAN surname like Tan, Lim, Chong, Teoh, but we called the Manchurian’s costumes as our traditional costumes. Manchurians have surname like Yehonala, Nurhachi, Aisinjeoro. Not LIm, Tan, Chong. They didn’t even know that.

Having said that, I , who camed from a Malay school, knew more about Chinese Culture, History, Wisdom and knowledge than them.

their defence of chauvinism hence became obsolete, as you DON’T NEED Chinese school to defend the culture/knowledge of the 5000 years old wisdom.

b.) For the language, Economical reason since China is big.

That reason is even worse. Singapore has ZERO Chinese School, but mandated everyone to brush up their mother tongue. Singaporean ethnic chinese ended up speaking better Mandarin than Malaysian ethnic CHinese/Han. THey didn’t even need Chinese school for that?

If Mandarin is there for economical and practical reason, they SHOULD acknowledge that and propogate mandarin’s learning through the right way. Not the chauvinistic way. I went to Malay school, but took up mandarin all the way to SPM, ended up knowing more about mandarin the language, and Chinese culture than many of the Chinese School graduates.

c.) Don’t Know, just follow my parent’s wish

That is the most dangerous part. This is exactly the very reason many chinese are living in our ancestors’ legacy of Grieving and Mourning over the fact that they COULDn”T go BACK to china, and to make sure that their descendant are at least well equipped with the language so that when they eventually go back to CHINA they would be able to adopt at least in terms of language.

Chinese Education, is different from Chinese Education system. I think it is important for people of every ethnic origin to keep trace of their cultural route including language.

But we MUST not create an Education system purely to accomodate that aspect. Our Ancestors had valid reason to create a separate education system for chinese, for the very reason to prepare themselves and their next generation to Go Back and adapt to CHina. but now that we are permanently settled down in Malaysia, we should defend our mother tongue as a “language to trace our root”, but not a SEPARATE SYSTEM altogether that would alienate a racial group from another throughout their growing time.

_________________________________________________________
5.) China Premier Zhou En Lai’s visit

in the 70s, when China ended it’s close door policy and begin to build foreign ties, Zhou En Lai visited Malaysia. He then made a statement, asking Malaysian Chinese to Swear our loyalty to Malaysia, to our King the Yang Dipertuan Agong.

That puts an END to our grievance and despair of our ancestors, in an abrupt way. No more going back to CHina. CHINA closed it’s door to them.

Instead of moving on and , like every other chinese around the world, to assimilate and integrate, our second generation ancestors were very CONFUSED. their affinity to Chinese school system is now changed, from initially being an affinity to mainland china, to purely the school system. It’s like , I am an Alumni from Chong Hwa school, and i would NOT let it be replaced/closed. There are 1297 Chinese school in Malaysia, and every each of these schools have alumnis who would, for the sake of their affinity to the school per se, defend and justify their existence.

It soon became and issue of “Quality of Education”.

Chinese School was preferred, in the modern context, mostly because of their quality. I have people telling me, Chinese School has better teacher and better quality, thats why we send our kids there.

Therefore it’s imperative that we do not hide under the facade and hypocrisy of “Defending 5000 years old culture”, and admit that the reason they go to chinese school is because of practical/economical/and quality consideration.

_________________________________________________________

6.) Chinese’s ability and willingness to adapt.

The Chinese, in fact, are among those who are most willing to adapt and modify our culture to intergrate with another culture that we look “highly” too. (of course, keeping a trace of our ethnic han route)

How many Chinese couples wear our traditional Han Fu costume during weddings. westernized, no?

Why many Chinese would adopt “Christian” name (NOT western, i am talking about name like Michael, Kelvin, Joseph, which are CHRISTIAN name) despite not being christians, and fact that it’s very foreign to Chinese culture? of course they keep their enthic HAN route by keeping the surname/given name.

Why so many Chinese are willing to modify our offerings to the Deities? instead of candle light, many are now replaced with, hmn… red bulbs?

Talk about food, do you know that many of the SO CALLED Chinese food like Hokkien Mee, Bak Kut Teh, Hainam Chicken rice, can NEVER be found in Hokkien, or Hainam China? it’s a modification and adaptation to the South East Asian CHINESE taste and preference. If you can modify most of the important cultures, it means you are flexible!

Chinese has a fairly flexible mode to adapt.

fact that the reason Chinese refuse to adapt to the Native nusantarian culture and behaviour, is very worrying. That’s the root of Racism, sparked by FAKE chinese chauvinism.

have you seen a Zikri Tan Boon Hook? or Fatimah Ng Siew Lai? ok lets try with malay names instead of Islamic /arabic/persian name. how about Mawar Liew Mei Siew? or Delima Ong Mai Ling? no? you see more Christophers, Kelvins, Michaels (no offence to many of my friends who’ve adopted christians name) than ever.

Why did we fail to adapt to the native customes and culture is something that we have to ponder upon. i WOULD NOT spell the words out here and risk being labelled a “traitor to the race” like what Emeritus Professor Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim has been treated rudely by the ignorant chauvinists.

For my Chinese Friends who speaks hokkien.

How do you call a Malay person in Hokkien? HUANNA 蕃仔 ? please use baidu.com to find out what that really means. it’s a disgrace and i felt ashamed.

_______________________________________________________________

7.) China Town

Have you been to the China Town in US big sities, and also London’s CHina Town? the China town in Western Countries are VERY chinese. It serves as a “remembraces” and “traces” of the Chinese origin for the migrants, as well as , for economical purposes sell off the unique chineseness to the foreigners. Most Chinese migrants in these country, who’re well assimilated in their respective native culture, would from time to time, visit China Town to remind themselve about their root, in the form of remembrances more than “embracing” them.

Have you been to the China Twon in Kuala LUmpur, and feel the sorry state of it even being duped as “china town”? There is NO NEED for a China Town in Malaysia. most town in Malaysia is China Town. Chinese bill boards, Chinese advertorials, Chinese signboards etc. Why is there a need for a “CHINATOWN” anymore? any Street in Penang or Certain street in KL/ Serdang/Puchong could well beat London’s China town as a more “china” china town.

_____________________________________________________________

8.) Malaysian First, or CHinese First?

Funny enough, If you ask that question, Many Ethnic Han Chinese Malaysian would answer you that they are Malaysian first, and Chinese second, without KNOWING what it means to be Malaysian first.

(Caution, if you are a URBAN BANANA, this does not applies to you. according to cense report, there are only 9% of you existing. rest 91% are Chinese educated ) You wake up every morning and watch TVBS Asia, pheonix channel, CCTV4, or hua hee tai. Shows that 80% of other Malaysians who are not chinese will never watch. Tune in to 988, myFM, aiFM, OneFM, channels that 80% of Malaysians don’t understand and will never listen to. You reach your office, open up SinChew, NanYang, GwongMing, KwongWah, China Press, Oriental daily, something that only 80% of Malaysians CANNOT understand. you MIGHT have lunch with your malay/indian colleagues, and chat about life and work. once you go home from work, you talk to your family, children in Mandarin, a language that 80% of Malaysians CANNOT speak or understand. before you sleep, you go to facebook and scroll through. You post among your friends, whom 80% came from your ethnic.

in your daily routine, you are only a MALAYSIAN for 20%, but Chinese 80%. and you call yourself a MALAYSIAN FIRST? hmn… then perhaps, you could tell me how would Chinese first or Malaysian first make a different to you? Lets not quote me example of “WHEN YOU ARE OVERSEA” because you know what, how long are you over sea? so you’re only Malaysian first when you are oversea? hmnnn.

The goal of me posting this long post, is to ASK for the ethnic HAN chinese Malaysian, to really reconsider our stand on issues pertaining race. Stop being chauvinistic and start to integrate and assimilate, WITHOUT compromising your ethnic identity. CHinese in UK/ US/ Thailand all did that willingly. why can’t we? it’s our ancestors’ teaching that we SHOULD do that.
WAKE UP from our ancestors grievance and despair of not being able to go back to China. We are done with that. Let the grievance and despair follow our ancestors to their grave. Start rethinking about your stand as Malaysian.

Please INTEGRATE and ASSIMILATE into the native culture, and OF COURSE , keep mandarin as a language that would trace your ethnic origin. NOT THE OTHER WAY round or you are still TRAPPED in our ancestor’s grievance.

___________________________________________________________

P/s I will write another post on HOW Mandarin, a dialect of the northerner, KILLS OFF our mother tongue (which is our dialect). Mother tongue for Chinese is different, it’s not the language, but the dialect that our ancestors used. Do you know that great poet LI BAI 李白 wrote his poem in HE BEI dialect, which is the current “Hokkien Language”, and the HE BEI dialect was the OFFICIAL language used in TANG dynasty royal palace and court? and there you think everyone in the movie speaks mandarin it must be the spoken language back then. MANDARIN is killing off your mother tonger. THe language is called HAN language 汉语。mandarin, (formerly 官语,(language of the aristocrats), now 普通话 putong hua, 华语 huayu) is MERELY a dialect of the northener. Chinese language is HANYU + your DIALECT. NOT Hanyu + MANDARIN. that i will discuss in another post.

I further dedicate this post to Joan Lai, Wayne Teo, Jeffrey Foh, and every Chinese Malaysian who thinks that we MUST learn how to integrate into the native Malaysian culture.

Regards

TAI ZEE KIN

Kesesakan lalu lintas melambangkan demokrasi?

in Rencana by

pru-13

Terjemahan Akhbar Cina – China Press

China Press
Ruangan: kedai kopi orang ramai m/s 11
11 Mei 2013 (Sabtu)

Kesesakan lalu lintas melambangkan demokrasi?
Penulis: Cheah Siao Feng

Pakatan Rakyat sering mendabik dada mereka bertarung semata-mata mahu tegakkan kebebasan dan demokrasi, seperti kerajaan yang dipimpin oleh BN tidak bebas dan tidak demokrasi. Tetapi PRU baru sahaja tamat, Pakatan Rakyat menolak keputusan PRU, menidakkan membuat bantahan melalui undang-undang yang ada dan adakan perhimpunan bantahan, dari segi ini boleh dilihat, adakah ia “Demokrasi”, adakah ia “menghormati undang-undang”.

Pada Selasa malam, mereka adakan perhipunan bantahan secara besar-besaran di Kelana Jaya, dalam stadium tersebut ada 100 ribu orang, di luar stadium termasuk yang tidak sempat datang kerana kesesakan lalu lintas, juga ada puluhan ribu orang, semangat mereka berkubar-kubar. Perhimpunan tersebut seperti Festival antara kaum,orang Cina dan kaum lain terutama sekali orang-orang Melayu, seperti sudah rapat mesra, melambangkan mereka saling berhubung rapat, sekali lagi meniddakan rasis BN dan menolak apa yang dimaksudkan Tsunami politik bantahan orang Cina.

Orang lain yang jadi mangsa

Suasana ini, mengikut kata-kata orang yang hadir, semangat mereka membara, sangat terasa, ditambah dengan pelayar internet, mereka juga rasa perkara yang sama. Tetapi kegembiraan mereka sebaliknya orang lain pula menderita, orang-orang seperti ini selalunya mendapat kegembiraan untuk diri sendiri, mereka tidak hiraukan nasib orang lain dan jadikan orang lain mangsa.

Pada malam tersebut, ada ataupun tidak orang lain yang rasa sengsara? Memang ada, ada ramai yang sengsara. Pada malam tersebut, laluan lebuh raya Damansara Puchong, laluan lebuh raya Shah Alam dan Federal, kerana perhimpunan tersebut dimana kenderaan terlalu banyak, menyebabkan kesesakan lalu lintas yang serius, kenderaan tidak boleh bergerak, ada yang memerlukan 4 hingga 5 jam baru dapat lepaskan diri dari kesesakan.

Jika semua pemandu ini adalah penyokong Pakatan Rakyat, susah macam mana sekalipun mereka tetap boleh sabar, kerana itu pilihan mereka, tetapi pengguna jalan raya tidak mungkin semuanya mahu menghadiri perhimpunan itu. ada yang mahu balik ke rumah, ada yang mahu pergi makan, ada yang mahu membuat perjumpaan, kerana perhimpunan Pakatan Rakyat mereka telah bazirkan masa dan tenaga, hanya satu malam mereka telah rosakkan segalanya. Jika berlaku pada anda, kenderaan tidak boleh maju ke hadapan, tidak boleh undur, rasa lapar dan penat,di atas jalan tunggu 3 hingga 4jam, anda rasa marah ataupun tidak?

Menyebabkan kesesakan lalu lintas

Isu ini pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat perlu bertanggungjawab sepenuhnya. Jika mereka menjangkakan ada 100 ribu orang yang hadir, sepatutnya tidak pilih tempat stadium yang hanya mampu menampung 25 ribu pengunjung, sepatutnya pilih kawasan yang lebih sesuai. Dan langsung tidak menyediakan petugas lalu lintas, menyebabkan kesesakan berlaku.

Selain dari itu, orang-orang yang lebih bertanggungjawab, mereka-mereka yang pakir kenderaan mereka di atas jalan raya sebaliknya berjalan kaki ke kawasan perhimpunan, mereka langsung tidak hiraukan keadaan orang lain, mereka terlalu pentingkan diri sendiri.

Yang paling orang lain marah ialah, penyokong Pakatan Rakyat menyusahkan orang lain, langsung tidak tahu merendah diri, hanya fikirkan emosi mereka yang berkubar-kubar, tetapi tidak hiraukan kamaharan orang lain. Ada pemberita kerana kesesakan lalu lintas mereka naik marah, dalam Facebook mereka luahkan perasaan, ahkhirnya diperlekehkan oleh orang ramai.

Adakah ininya cara untuk mengejar tuntutan demokrasi, ini kah menjadi badan politik yang lebih ideal, dan ini kah contoh baik yang mereka paparkan?

‘BN will be toppled this year’

in Rencana by

A massive street rally is being planned to overthrow the ruling government.

haris-ibrahimKUALA LUMPUR: Pro-Pakatan Rakyat groups have vowed to overthrow the Barisan Nasional government this year through a massive street rally.

Speakers at a forum held yesterday unanimously agreed that waiting for five years until the next
general election was too long, and vowed to overthrow BN this year through “force”.

The street rally is rumoured to be as early as May 17 or 18 to overthrow BN and capture Putrajaya.

“We will take to the streets and take over Putrajaya. If we really want to overthrow them, there is no other way. Democracy does not work,” Haris Ibrahim from ABU (Anything But Umno) told the 1,500-strong crowd here.

“The people cannot wait anymore. We don’t want to wait another five years. We will take the streets,” he added.

PKR vice-president and Batu MP Tian Chua mirrored Haris’ cry to overthrow BN through force, and said it was the people’s choice.

“The decision to wait another five years or fight is not the right of Pakatan leaders, the results during the polls were not of Pakatan… but the rakyat’s,” he said.

‘This is not a threat, it is a promise’

Meanwhile, student leader Adam Adli Halim challenged the authorities to arrest him for urging the public to overthrow the government.

“Najib calls us the minority, but today we are proud to be the new majority in the country. We are able to mobilise and seize back our democracy that was stolen from us,” he said to loud cheers.

“We cannot wait for five years to overthrow Umno and BN, 2013 is ours. We will bring them down.

“I urge the people of Malaysia to unite and go down to the streets to take back what is ours. Elections won’t overthrow the government, the people’s power will,” he added.

Electoral watchdog group Bersih 2.0 steering committee member  Hishamuddin Rais pointed out that it was useless to take their unhappiness to the courts as he claimed the justice system was being controlled by the government.

“That is why we must take to the streets. We have to come out. What Najib likes is wrong, and what he doesn’t like is what we have to do,” he said.

“We will mobilise a big group and rally on the streets. This is not a threat, this is a promise,” he stressed.

Following the general election on Sunday that saw ruling Barisan Nasional capture their 13th consecutive victory, Pakatan and their supporters have claimed that the polls were rigged.-FMT

Pisau kata ” comfirm lepas ni akan dapat amaran keras terakhir kali ke tiga…”

Malaysia: Failure of U.S. to Subvert the Elections and Install a “Proxy Regime”

in Rencana by

Tony Cartalucci – Wall Street and London’s hegemonic ambitions in Asia, centered around installing proxy regimes across Southeast Asia and using the supranational ASEAN bloc to encircle and contain China, suffered a serious blow this week when Western-proxy and Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s party lost in general elections.While Anwar Ibrahim’s opposition party, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) or “People’s Alliance,” attempted to run on an anti-corruption platform, its campaign instead resembled verbatim attempts by the West to subvert governments politically around the world, including most recently in Venezuela, and in Russia in 2012.

Just as in Russia where so-called “independent” election monitor GOLOS turned out to be fully funded by the US State Department through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Malaysia’s so-called election monitor, the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED. Despite this, Western media outlets, in pursuit of promoting the Western-backed People’s Alliance, has repeatedly referred to Merdeka as “independent.”

Malaysia_najib-razak2013

Despite the US mobilizing the summation of its media power and pouring millions of dollars into the opposition party, including the creation and perpetuation of fake-NGOs such as Bersih and the Merdeka Center, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak sailed to a comfortable victory in this year’s general elections. The cheap veneer has begun peeling away from America’s “democracy promotion” racket, leaving its proxies exposed and frantic, and America’s hegemonic ambitions across Asia in serious question.

However, an election monitoring organization funded by a foreign government which openly seeks to remove the current ruling party from Malaysia in favor of long-time Wall Street servant Anwar Ibrahim is most certainly not “independent.”

The ties between Anwar Ibrahim’s “People’s Alliance” and the US State Department don’t end with the Merdeka Center, but continue into the opposition’s street movement, “Bersih.” Claiming to fight for “clean and fair” elections, Bersih in reality is a vehicle designed to mobilize street protests on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party. Bersih’s alleged leader, Ambiga Sreenevasan, has admitted herself that her organization has received cash directly from the United States via the National Endowment for Democracy’s National Democratic Institute (NDI), and convicted criminal George Soros’ Open Society.

The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan:

“…admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.”

A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization – before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.

NDIbersihFunding

The substantial, yet carefully obfuscated support the West has lent Anwar should be of no surprise to those familiar with Anwar’s history. That Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy’s “Democracy Award” and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony – the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called “independent” election monitor Merdeka – paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.

AnwarNED

Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy’s 2007 Democracy Award event held in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a “panelist.” It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia. (click image to enlarge)

In reality, Bersih’s leadership along with Anwar and their host of foreign sponsors are attempting to galvanize the very real grievances of the Malaysian people and exploit them to propel themselves into power. While many may be tempted to suggest that “clean and fair elections” truly are Bersih and Anwar’s goal, and that US funding via NED’s NDI  are entirely innocuous, a thorough examination of these organizations, how they operate, and their admitted agenda reveals the proverbial cliff Anwar and Bersih are leading their followers and the nation of Malaysia over.

As Bersih predictably mobilizes in the streets on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party in the wake of their collective failure during Malaysia’s 2013 general elections, it is important for Malaysians to understand the true nature of the Western organizations funding their attempts to politically undermine the ruling party and divide Malaysians against each other, and exactly why this is being done in the greater context of US hegemony in Asia.

Anwar & Bersih’s US State Department Backers

The US State Department’s NED and NDI are most certainly not benevolent promoters of democracy and freedom.Does Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Exxon, the SOPA, ACTA, CISPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce, and America’s warmongering Neo-Con establishment care about promoting democracy in Malaysia? Or in expanding their corporate-financier interests in Asia under the guise of promoting democracy? Clearly the latter.

The NDI, which Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevasan herself admits funds her organization, is likewise chaired by an unsavory collection of corporate interests.

The average Malaysian, disenfranchised with the ruling government as they may be, cannot possibly believe these people are funding and propping up clearly disingenuous NGOs in direct support of a compromised Anwar Ibrahim, for the best interests of Malaysia.The end game for the US with an Anwar Ibrahim/People’s Alliance-led government, is a Malaysia that capitulates to both US free trade schemes and US foreign policy. In Malaysia’s case, this will leave the extensive economic independence achieved since escaping out from under British rule, gutted, while the nation’s resources are steered away from domestic development and toward a proxy confrontation with China, just as is already being done in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines.

Stitching ASEAN Together with Proxy Regimes to Fight China

gullivers-travels

Image: Lemuel Gulliver on the island of Lilliput, having been overtaken while asleep by ropes and stakes by the diminutive but numerous Lilliputians. Western corporate-financier interests envision organizing Southeast Asia into a supranational bloc, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), to use the smaller nations as a combined front to “tie down” China in a similar manner. Unlike in the story “Gulliver’s Travels,” China may well break free of its binds and stomp the Lilliputian leaders flat for their belligerence.

That the US goal is to use Malaysia and other Southeast Asian nations against China is not merely speculation. It is the foundation of a long-documented conspiracy dating back as far as 1997, and reaffirmed by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as recently as 2011.

KaganQuote_1997

In 1997,  Fortune 500-funded (page 19) Brookings Institution policy scribe Robert Kagan penned, “What China Knows That We Don’t: The Case for a New Strategy of Containment,” which spells out the policy Wall Street and London were already in the process of implementing even then, albeit in a somewhat more nebulous manner. In his essay, Kagan literally states (emphasis added):

The present world order serves the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it. And it is poorly suited to the needs of a Chinese dictatorship trying to maintain power at home and increase its clout abroad. Chinese leaders chafe at the constraints on them and worry that they must change the rules of the international system before the international system changes them.

Here, Kagan openly admits that the “world order,” or the “international order,” is simply American-run global hegemony, dictated by US interests. These interests, it should be kept in mind, are not those of the American people, but of the immense corporate-financier interests of the Anglo-American establishment. Kagan continues (emphasis added):

In truth, the debate over whether we should or should not contain China is a bit silly. We are already containing China — not always consciously and not entirely successfully, but enough to annoy Chinese leaders and be an obstacle to their ambitions. When the Chinese used military maneuvers and ballistic-missile tests last March to intimidate Taiwanese voters, the United States responded by sending the Seventh Fleet. By this show of force, the U.S. demonstrated to Taiwan, Japan, and the rest of our Asian allies that our role as their defender in the region had not diminished as much as they might have feared. Thus, in response to a single Chinese exercise of muscle, the links of containment became visible and were tightened.

The new China hands insist that the United States needs to explain to the Chinese that its goal is merely, as [Robert] Zoellick writes, to avoid “the domination of East Asia by any power or group of powers hostile to the United States.” Our treaties with Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, and Australia, and our naval and military forces in the region, aim only at regional stability, not aggressive encirclement.

But the Chinese understand U.S. interests perfectly well, perhaps better than we do. While they welcome the U.S. presence as a check on Japan, the nation they fear most, they can see clearly that America’s military and diplomatic efforts in the region severely limit their own ability to become the region’s hegemon. According to Thomas J. Christensen, who spent several months interviewing Chinese military and civilian government analysts, Chinese leaders worry that they will “play Gulliver to Southeast Asia’s Lilliputians, with the United States supplying the rope and stakes.”

Indeed, the United States blocks Chinese ambitions merely by supporting what we like to call “international norms” of behavior. Christensen points out that Chinese strategic thinkers consider “complaints about China’s violations of international norms” to be part of “an integrated Western strategy, led by Washington, to prevent China from becoming a great power.

What Kagan is talking about is maintaining American preeminence across all of Asia and producing a strategy of tension to divide and limit the power of any single player vis-a-vis Wall Street and London’s hegemony. Kagan would continue (emphasis added):

The changes in the external and internal behavior of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s resulted at least in part from an American strategy that might be called “integration through containment and pressure for change.”

Such a strategy needs to be applied to China today. As long as China maintains its present form of government, it cannot be peacefully integrated into the international order. For China’s current leaders, it is too risky to play by our rules — yet our unwillingness to force them to play by our rules is too risky for the health of the international order. The United States cannot and should not be willing to upset the international order in the mistaken belief that accommodation is the best way to avoid a confrontation with China.

We should hold the line instead and work for political change in Beijing. That means strengthening our military capabilities in the region, improving our security ties with friends and allies, and making clear that we will respond, with force if necessary, when China uses military intimidation or aggression to achieve its regional ambitions. It also means not trading with the Chinese military or doing business with firms the military owns or operates. And it means imposing stiff sanctions when we catch China engaging in nuclear proliferation.

A successful containment strategy will require increasing, not decreasing, our overall defense capabilities. Eyre Crowe warned in 1907 that “the more we talk of the necessity of economising on our armaments, the more firmly will the Germans believe that we are tiring of the struggle, and that they will win by going on.” Today, the perception of our military decline is already shaping Chinese calculations. In 1992, an internal Chinese government document said that America’s “strength is in relative decline and that there are limits to what it can do.” This perception needs to be dispelled as quickly as possible.

Kagan’s talk of “responding” to China’s expansion is clearly manifested today in a series of proxy conflicts growing between US-backed Japan, and the US-backed Philippines, and to a lesser extent between North and South Korea, and even beginning to show in Myanmar. The governments of these nations have capitulated to US interests and their eagerness to play the role of America’s proxies in the region, even at their own cost, is not a surprise. To expand this, however, the US fully plans on integrating Southeast Asia, installing proxy regimes, and likewise turning their resources and people against China.

In 2011, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unveiled the capstone to Kagan’s 1997 conspiracy. She published in Foreign Policy magazine, a piece titled, “America’s Pacific Century” where she explicitly states:

In the next 10 years, we need to be smart and systematic about where we invest time and energy, so that we put ourselves in the best position to sustain our leadership, secure our interests, and advance our values. One of the most important tasks of American statecraft over the next decade will therefore be to lock in a substantially increased investment — diplomatic, economic, strategic, and otherwise — in the Asia-Pacific region.

To “sustain our leadership,” “secure our interests,” and “advance our values,” are clearly hegemonic statements, and indicates that the US’ goal for “substantially increased investment,” including buying off NGOs and opposition parties in Malaysia, seeks to directly serve US leadership, interests, and “values,”  not within US borders, but outside them, and specifically across all of Asia.

Clinton continues:

At a time when the region is building a more mature security and economic architecture to promote stability and prosperity, U.S. commitment there is essential. It will help build that architecture and pay dividends for continued American leadership well into this century, just as our post-World War II commitment to building a comprehensive and lasting transatlantic network of institutions and relationships has paid off many times over — and continues to do so.

The “architecture” referred to is the supranational ASEAN bloc – and again Clinton confirms that the US’ commitment to this process is designed not to lift up Asia, but to maintain its own hegemony across the region, and around the world.

Clinton then openly admits that the US seeks to exploit Asia’s economic growth:

Harnessing Asia’s growth and dynamism is central to American economic and strategic interests and a key priority for President Obama. Open markets in Asia provide the United States with unprecedented opportunities for investment, trade, and access to cutting-edge technology. Our economic recovery at home will depend on exports and the ability of American firms to tap into the vast and growing consumer base of Asia.

Of course, the purpose of an economy is to meet the needs of those who live within it. The Asian economy therefore ought to serve the needs and interests of Asians – not a hegemonic empire on the other side of the Pacific. Clinton’s piece could easily double as a declaration by England’s King George and his intentions toward emptying out the New World.

And no empire is complete without establishing a permanent military garrison on newly claimed territory. Clinton explains (emphasis added):

With this in mind, our work will proceed along six key lines of action: strengthening bilateral security alliances; deepening our working relationships with emerging powers, including with China; engaging with regional multilateral institutions; expanding trade and investment; forging a broad-based military presence; and advancing democracy and human rights.

And of course, by “advancing democracy and human rights,” Clinton means the continuation of funding faux-NGOs that disingenuously leverage human rights and democracy promotion to politically undermine targeted governments in pursuit of installing more obedient proxy regimes.

The piece is lengthy, and while a lot of readers may be tempted to gloss over some of the uglier, overtly imperial aspects of Clinton’s statement, the proof of America’s true intentions in Asia can be seen clearly manifested today, with the intentional encouragement of provocations between North and South Korea, an expanding confrontation between China and US proxies, Japan and the Philippines, and with mobs taking to the streets in Malaysia in hopes of overturning an election US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim had no chance of winning.

Clean & Fair Elections?

While the battle cry for Anwar Ibrahim, his People’s Alliance, and Bersih have been “clean and fair elections,” in reality, allegations of fraud began long before the elections even started. This was not because Anwar’s opposition party had evidence of such fraud – instead, this was to implant the idea into people’s minds long before the elections, deeply enough to justify claims of stolen elections no matter how the polls eventually turned out.

At one point during the elections, before ballots were even counted, Anwar Ibrahim declared victory – a move that analysts across the region noted was provocative, dangerous, and incredibly irresponsible. Again, there could not have been any evidence that Anwar won, because ballots had not yet been counted. It was again a move meant to manipulate the public and set the stage for contesting Anwar’s inevitable loss – in the streets with mobs and chaos in typical Western-backed color revolution style.

One must seriously ask themselves, considering Anwar’s foreign backers, those backers’ own stated intentions for Asia, and Anwar’s irresponsible, baseless claims before, during, and after the elections – what is “clean and fair” about any of this?

Anwar Ibrahim is a fraud, an overt proxy of foreign interests. His satellite NGOs, including the insidious Bersih movement openly funded by foreign corporate-financier interests, and the equally insidious polling NGO Merdeka who portrays itself as “independent” despite being funded directly by a foreign government, are likewise frauds – drawing in well-intentioned people through slick marketing, just as cigarette companies do.

And like cigarette companies who sell what is for millions essentially a slow, painful, humiliating death sentence that will leave one broken financially and spiritually before ultimately outright killing them, Anwar’s US-backed opposition is also selling Malaysia a slow, painful, humiliating death. Unfortunately, also like cigarettes, well-intentioned but impressionable people have not gathered all of the facts, and have instead have based their support on only the marketing, gimmicks, slogans, and tricks of a well-oiled, manipulative political machine.

For that folly, Malaysia may pay a heavy price one day – but for Anwar and his opposition party today, they have lost the elections, and the cheap veneer of America’s “democracy promotion” racket is quickly peeling away. For now, America has tripped in mid-pivot toward its hegemonic agenda in Asia, with Malaysia’s ruling government providing a model for other nations in the region to follow, should they be interested in sovereignty and independent progress – no matter how flawed or slow it may be.

Chinese taken for a Ride at GE 13 by DAP

in Rencana by

ge13-malaysia-general-election-ballot-box

StopTheLies-The Chinese must have been a frustrated lot when they woke up on May 6 to find that the Barisan Nasional government was very much in power still.

The expectation from the past two weeks of attending capacity crowd ceramahs was high – that the government would change, but it did not.

There were no victory parade, no victory smiles except frustration and disappointment all written on their faces.

The much anticipated belief that the Barisan Nasional government would fall and that Putrajaya would end up in the hands of Pakatan Rakyat was reduced to an illusive dream.

The Chinese, known to be good mathematicians, had miscalculated on the political reality that the BN could not fall as they enjoy good support from the rural Malays which make up a substantial number of the 13.3 million voters.

This is also not forgetting the fixed deposit areas in Sabah and Sarawak. The two states alone delivered some 33 more seats and it would be almost impossible to initiate a change of government without any revolt from either the Malays or the East Malaysian counterparts.

Even though the urban Malays are generally perceived to have voted for Pakatan, the bulk of the rural Malays are more inclined towards Barisan Nasional.

Furthermore, of the 222 parliamentary seats, only 46 are Chinese majority seats and another 50 over odd seats are located in Felda schemes.

Presumably the Opposition wins all the 45 Chinese majority seats; it still cannot possibly topple the government. In this election, the DAP with the combined might of its PAS and PKR partners, had won 38 seats.

The most that the Chinese could inflict damage was to empower DAP which was the apparent big winner in Pakatan securing the majority seats at 38 followed by Parti Keadilan (30) and PAS (20).

The biggest casualty this time around for Pakatan is actually PAS. It could be attributed to its alliance with DAP that the rural Malays did not find traction or relevance with their political culture and all.

This time around PAS fared badly, securing only 21 seats of the 73 seats it contested compared to the 2008 election where they secured 23 seats of the 66 seats it contested.

PAS also lost grip of its Kedah state to Barisan and lost five more state seats in Kelantan from 37 seats it won in 2008 to 32 seats now.

Sad by true that the election results have given rise to an emergence of a two race system where the Chinese had ended up in the Opposition and the Malays being the government in control.

The DAP had misled the Chinese into thinking that voting for them could lead to a change of government. However the end result now is greater racial polarisation.

The greatest losers are the Chinese after they have been taken for a ride by the DAP.

Yuktes Dedah Misteri Jam Omega Anwar

in Rencana by

20130502-211619.jpg

Antarapos – Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Ismail menyedari kehilangan jam Omega pada hari sama video seks Datuk T mula ditayangkan di khalayak ramai dua tahun lalu, kata seorang bekas peguambela Anwar Ibrahim.

Yuktes Vijay berkata pada 23 Mac 2011, beliau bersama peguam lain dan beberapa pemimpin PKR berada di rumah Anwar di Segambut apabila desas-desus wartawan menonton video China Doll itu tersebar.

“Kami duduk menanti beliau, seketika kemudian, Anwar pun turun memakai singlet dan sarong dengan perut buncit. Ya. Pada ketika itu perutnya buncit,” kata Yuktes dalam memperinci pengalamannya berkerja dengan pasukan peguam Anwar.

Azizah sedar jam Omega hilang

“Seketika kemudian, Wan Azizah meluru ke arah Anwar dan berkata kepadanya ‘Bang jam dah hilang’,” kata beliau.

Pendedahan Yuktes menggemparkan kerana Azizah dan Anwar sebelum ini rata-rata menegaskan jam itu ada dalam simpanan mereka apabila Anwar dikaitkan dengan video seks membabitkan pelacur.

Yuktes berkata beliau hanya memberikan perhatian kepada kenyataan Azizah kira-kira seminggu selepas Shazryl Eskay mendedahkan bahawa beliau mempunyai jam itu.

Eskay mendakwa jam itu ditinggalkan oleh pelaku dalam video berkenaan di kamar hotel selepas mengadakan hubungan seks dengan pelacur berkenaan.

Yuktes berkata, meskipun beliau tersentak dengan misteri jam omega itu, “saya mengambil pendirian ketika itu untuk terus dengan kerja saya..dan saya anggap yang dilakukan oleh Anwar adalah antara beliau dan isterinya,” kata Yuktes.

Dalam wawancara itu Yuktes mengupas bagaimana beliau bertukar daripada seorang “Anwarista” tegar kepada pengkritik Ketua Pembangkang itu selepas melihat perwatakannya dari dekat.

“Banyak benda yang saya sendiri perhatikan ketika perbicaraan dan di luar mahkamah membuat saya berfikir semula mengenai orang ini,” kata beliau.

Tolak Anwar sebab dia tidak layak

Dengan hari pengundian 24 jam lagi, Yuktes berkata beliau sekali lagi tampil untuk menggesa pengundi menolak Anwar kerana beliau tidak layak memimpin negara.

“Saya tidak akan lupa 23 Mac kerana itu hari jadi saya…Anwar nampak gelisah dengan tayangan video itu di Carcosa. Budak-budaknya sibuk mencari alasan untuk menafikan Anwar pelakunya,” kata Yuktes.

Beliau berkata Anwar pada mulanya mahu menuduh bahawa video itu menggunakan teknologi CGI (computer generated image) namun kemudian setuju menggunakan alasan ‘pelaku dalam video buncit perut’ dan beliau tidak,” kata Yuktes.

Jadi rancangan pun diatur untuk beliau memakai sebuah vest untuk menutup perutnya itu,” kata Yuktes.

Mengupas kes Anwar dituduh meliwat Saifu Bukhari Azlan pada tahun 2008, Yuktes berkata pelbagai pihak di kem Anwar sendiri yakin ketua pembangkang itu akan disabitkan dengan tuduhan berkenaan.

Kesilapan besar Jude Pereira

“Namun yang menyelamatkan Anwar adalah kesilapan besar pegawai penyiasat polis Jude Pereira untuk tidak menyimpan bukti sampel DNA mengikut spesifikasi yang ditetapkan,” kata beliau.

Meskipun begitu, Yuktes berkata rakyat perlu menilai beberapa hakikat mengenai kes itu.

Paling utama adalah hakikat bahawa Anwar sendiri tidak berani memberikan keterangan di kandang saksi.

“Ini tentunya kerana Anwar tidak mungkin menjawab persoalan kenapa beliau memberi layanan istimewa kepada Saiful, termasuk mengiringinya ke luar negara dan macam-macam lagi walaupun baru mula bekerja,” kata Yuktes.

Yuktes berkata beliau sendiri sangsi terhadap pengakuan tidak bersalah oleh Anwar ke atas tuduhan itu apabila pasukan peguambela Anwar menemuramah pemilik kondominium di mana kejadian itu didakwa berlaku.

Pemilik kondominium enggan bantu Anwar

“Orangnya, Hasanuddin Abdul Hamid dan isteri begitu rapat dengan keluarga Anwar. Nurul memanggil isterinya ibu,” kata beliau.

“ Hasanuddin sepatut cukup bersedia menjadi saksi alibi Anwar bagi mengesahkan beliau (Anwar) tidak ada dalam unit itu seperti yang dituduh. Tetapi beliau tidak berbuat demikian,” kata Yuktes.

“Hasanuddin tidak mahu menjadi saksi untuk Anwar. Dalam sesi temuramah itu beliau berulang kali memberitahu Anwar bahawa “awak tahu apa yang awak sudah lakukan,” kata Yuktes.

Yuktes menggesa pengundi untuk berfikir secara berhati-hati sebelum mengundi Pakatan Rakyat yang dipimpin oleh Anwar. .

Menurut beliau, Anwar mempunyai banyak personaliti yang orang ramai tidak menyedarinya.

Yuktes berkata peluang berkhidmat dengan Anwar membolehkan beliau memperoleh maklumat tentang gaya kepimpinan pemimpin PKR itu.

“Saya sendiri melihat bagaimana beliau akan mengerang dalam kesakitan mengenai kecederaan belakangnya di mahkamah dan sebelah malam, ketika berceramah, beliau bukan main ligat lagi,” katanya

Yuktes berkata, apa yang penting baginya ialah, Malaysia seharusnya diterajui seorang Perdana Menteri yang membawa negara ke tahap yang lebih tinggi berbanding seorang pemimpin yang akan menghancurkanya.

Pakatan Plans Spin & Trouble After Sunday

in Rencana by

Spinningmain

 

lkm

plane overload

Folks did you know that Singapore Police picked up Pakatan supporters campaigning among factory workers in Singapore? Now the Pakatan is organising transport to ferry people in from Singapore to vote in Gelang Patah.  Many of these people have PR in Singapore and have never voted before. Jeng jeng jeng.

Over in Kelantan the PAS-PIS-PUS is ferrying voters in from Thailand. Some of those people have citizenship in Thailand and Kelantan. This has been going on for a long time.

Here is the latest news from PKR sources. They are already preparing to lose the elections. Word has gone out for the PKR to spin (after Sunday) that they would have won with 21 seats if there had been no fraud. Their people are also expecting trouble after the results are announced.  So lets just remember that. To be fore-warned is to be fore-armed.

Well of the 13 or so other predictions that the Bloggers have made weeks and weeks ago about Anwar Ibrahim’s really stupid tricks, FOUR  have come true.

1. Thai porn actor look alike: We predicted that Anwar will present a look alike Thai porn actor to come on stage somewhere and say “ฉันได้เสมอต้องการให้มีลักษณะเหมือน  Anwar Ibrahim ฉันจ่ายเงินเป็นจำนวนมากและฉันสามารถมีลักษณะเหมือน Ambiga เกินไป”.

Well exactly according to script, they did find a Thai porn actor. But the guy they found was just 40 years old – not exactly the look alike of a 68 year old homo erectus. So they did not dare show him on any stage.

2. Qardhawi letter: Then we did predict weeks ago that they will produce a fake letter from Yusuf Qardhawi the  Arab khinzir look alike – endorsing Anwar as a leader worthy to bend over for.  Again exactly according to script, they did bring such a letter and even got tin sardin to endorse the letter.

3.  Azmin kisses and makes up with family: The other prediction that was made was that the Azmin fellow would make a video or take a picture with his family members. The family had kicked him out. This too has come to pass.

There was a reason the Blogs exposed that list. Firstly there are serious leaks inside the Braders nearest circle of friends.  The information is leaked out even before they can inform their own people. That is how the list was leaked out.

Secondly of course the idea is to make them look stupid. And they are stupid – people have been saying for weeks what you will be doing and then you do exactly as predicted.

It looks like that lost Omega watch (one of the predictions by the Bloggers) will not be making an appearance. That will make them look too  stupid.

Now another prediction –  ramping up the phantom voters or pengundi hantu issue is again spot on.This is prediction No. 4 that is being acted out exactly according to script. But true to Anwar Ibrahim’s intelligence, the story is too stupid and too full of holes.

Here is The Star:

‘Foreigners flown in to vote’
Anwar accused PM of chartering foreigners to  peninsula from Sabah & S’wak to vote.
Claiming to have a copy of an e-mail between top executives in an airline company implying that officers in the PMO were behind the charter, Anwar alleged that the foreigners would be ferried to various constituencies in the peninsula to vote in favour of Barisan Nasional.

Hoax : Documents with details “blacked out”
16 chartered flights a day from April 25 departing from Kuching, KK, Sandakan, Miri & Sibu…

  • 4,500 people into (KLIA) each day, at least 40,500 dubious individuals entering
  • provided purported evidence bearing airlines’ logo.
  • from Thailand, Cambodia, Pakistan and Myanmar through Bukit Kayu Hitam
  • from Indonesia via Port Klang and other coastal entry points.
  • foreigners based on “foreign-sounding” names in passenger list.

We have video recordings, photographic evidence and documents to support our claims.
Notice the dumb ass has blacked out some parts of his evidence. If UMNO holds up a blacked out document they will say it is a fake. Now he himself is holding up documents that have been blacked out. Bodoh.

OK remember Anwar is an almost failed Malay Studies graduate. He cant think very well. He is an intellectual dud.  He says:

i. 4,500 people come in thru KLIA daily.
ii. 40,500 foreigners have entered already.
iii. 16 chartered flights a day
iv. started from April 25th

Wow they are so mathematically precise and accurate: 4,500 people a day, 40500 foreigners, 16 flights a day. Such detailed information. No typos ah??  You know RM6.8 billion can become RM4.3 billion?

OK here is the arithmetic. If 4,500 people come in on 16 flights daily, that means 4,500 / 16 = 281 passengers per flight. Haiyya kawan, even MAS’ Airbus A320 can only take a maximum of 220 passengers.

Then he said (yesterday) that 40,500 foreigners have entered the Peninsula already since April 25  ie in just seven days.  So 40,500 / 7 = 5785 people a day. Again the arithmetic does not add up.  At first Anwar said 4,500 people came via 16 flights a day. Then his other figure says  5785 people arrived.

So which one is which? 4,500 people a day or 5,785 people a day?  The arithmetic simply does not add up. There is one way to increase the number of passengers per flight. You just put them on top of the plane.

Maybe at the next news conference someone should tell this jackass to do the necessary corrections.

To get 4,500 people a day, it should be 20 flights a day flying on Airbus A320 with maximum capacity of 220 passengers ok?

To get  5,785 passengers a day, it should be 26 flights a day (Airbus A320).  Just pick one plane and one number  and make the necessary corrections.plane overload

I am also perplexed – for UMNO’s Lahad Datu Sulu invasion conspiracy they said that the Government flew out our Army boys using Air Asia. The Government did not use MAS. Now for this foreign voters conspiracy the Government is using MAS. Not Air Asia.

They say they have “video recordings, photographic evidence and documents to support our claims”.  Eh.. tapi Hadi kata video itu besi. Tak boleh pakai maa.

If you have the evidence, show it now. Video itu besi pun tak apa lah – just show the evidence now. Dont wait until after May 5th, after you have lost the elections and then start showing these fake evidence around  (like the blacked out documents) just to stir up trouble.

The moron also says: “foreigners based on “foreign-sounding names in passenger listfrom Thailand, Cambodia, Pakistan and Myanmar through Bukit Kayu Hitam…

I say bodoh bangang – that is why people are called foreigners. Because they look different, they speak a different language and their names sound foreign. That is why the word ‘foreigner‘ exists.

But why on earth would anyone want to fly in foreigners with foreign sounding names to vote in the Peninsula? “from Thailand, Cambodia, Pakistan and Myanmar …

Hang ni bodoh ke? Do you mean UMNO is so stupid to fly in people with names sounding like Azzimudie Kiram, Bantilal Kiram, Manuel Arroyo Ejaculato, Aung San Su Kyi,  Molikul Shinawatra, Hun Sen, Benazir Bhutto and  Dimsang Rampa and just ask them to mingle with the crowds in Bangsar, Bukit Damansara, Seputeh, Tanjong Karang or Lembah Pantai?

Oh ok I get it now.  Prepare fake MyKads for them as well. So Aung San Suu Kyi will be sent to Kelantan to vote as Fatimah Bachok. Manuel Arroyo Ejaculato will be sent to Penang to vote as Abdool Kareeeeeem Abdool Sultaaan in Jelutong. Wah, UMNO so crever one.

(Whatever happened on the night this moron was conceived, the DNA for his brains was somehow placed in a different post box).

There is another reason why the moron is making these stupid statements.  They are going to use all this crap to stir up the crowds after the Polls close on Sunday. When they lose the elections – they are going to create trouble. All these fake documents and fake stories will be used to stir up their unthinking supporters. Just wait and see.

Let us all take precautions. I hope the Police will take the necessary precautions too. Please don’t say that you have not been warned.-StopTheLies

MALAYSIAN SPRING #GE13

in Rencana by
I’m a smalltime Chinese businessman. Spent my whole life in Kuala Lumpur. Started my business from scratch in the early 80’s and today, am proud to say that my company has 19 employees. On the political front, I would describe myself as the typical ‘businessman’ voter – A business man voter would always ask the question, “Which party would benefit my business most?”
I have been able to run my small business peacefully without being affected by external forces like street demonstrations and protests akin to the ones in Egypt and Syria. For me personally, it is sad to see a country faced with unrest like Egypt. This is so as it will be the small business owners like myself that will suffer greatly from unrest resulting from these demonstrations and protests.
One of my suppliers is from Egypt – Abasi. He told me that ever since the Arab Spring protests broke out in 2011, his company’s revenue had dropped 76 per cent. He told me that it’s simply impossible to run small businesses and make a profit in an unstable political environment like Egypt where street demonstrations are the norm every week. As a result, people are fearful to come out of their houses and businesses like his would be affected. Abasi sounded very emotional when he informed me of the effect of the unrest on his business – that from being able to live comfortably before, he is now struggling to put food on the table for his family of 6.
bersih9-300x200
This picture really struck a chord of fear within me. It would be an understatement to say that I am very fearful of this happening to my business. Perhaps the correct phrase to use is that I am ‘shit scared’ as to the possible effect that protests and demonstrations could have on my business. Thank god that until today I have been able to slowly grow my small business into what it is today with the help of a stablepolitical environment with no street demonstrations and protests akin to the ones in the Arab world.
What triggered me to write this article was when I stumbled upon a letter written by PKR, which was published by various blogs two weeks ago. The letter called for Opposition party members to cause maximum chaos, protests and demonstrations after the elections so as to raise doubts as to the validity of the election process. These were the exact steps that were taken in the beginning by the Opposition in Egypt which led to the outbreak of the Arab spring protest in Egypt which we all know has created instability and chaos until today.

 

After the February 2011 general election in which the Government led by Hosni Mubarak retained control of the government, the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt’s Opposition Party) called for its members to assemble at Tahrir Square (similar to our Dataran Merdeka) and create chaos by protesting against the election results in claiming that it has been rigged. The result speaks for itself – Egypt has been in a period of economic instability for the past two years with daily protests/demonstrations severely crippling the economy and especially businesses.
This blueprint of creating chaos through street demonstration and protests seems to have been copied by PKR as evident in its letter whereby it is intent on doing the same in our country. The content of the letter clearly show that the party intends to create chaos like the uprising in the Middle East to topple the elected Government.
I only have one question – What the bloody hell is wrong with these people? Are they so greedy for political power that they would sacrifice the peace/harmony of the country and instead put our country in turmoil like Egypt? The ones who will suffer are businesses like myself. It is just plain bloody selfish. Political parties that are willing to go that far to obtain power at the expense of its citizens don’t deserve my vote.
I dread the possibility of Malaysia going through an ‘Arab Spring’ whereby we the people will suffer and especially businesses. All for the dream of PKR to see one man – Anwar Ibrahim – become Prime Minister. What a load of bullshit!

#PRU13 Hot! Orang yang fikrah Islam yang jelas, dia tak akan biaq orang macam Anwar ni jadi pemimpin – Ahmad Uzair Dr Mazlan

in Rencana by

931170_602383553106519_458148321_n

Assalamualaikum sahabat-sahabat yang dikasihi.

Setelah lama menyepi maka aku akan ceritakan sebab-sebab Dr Mazlan menentang DSAI. Ramai rakan-rakan yang baik hati, private message aku dan tanya kenapa lawan DSAI. Alhamdulillah cara yang baik dan Islami. Tapi aku terkilan dengan mereka yang secara terbuka menyerang dan mengkritik aku, tag di sana sini. Kot2 nak PM dulu ka tanya ka, dak pun. Tanpa menyelidik pun sebab kenapa lawan DSAI.

Maka hari ini saya secara terbuka akan menceritakan kenapa kita perlu menentang DSAI. Dr Mazlan telah menggadaikan pekerjaan besar Naib Presiden Telekom Malaysia hanyalah demi menyelamatkan akidah ummat!

Anwar Ibrahim membawa bersamanya ideologi yang pelik, bercanggah dengan syarak. Maka kerana tiada siapa yang sudi untuk menentang beliau, maka Dr Mazlan lah yang menjadi ayam tambatan kepada ummat. Itu pun masih lagi yang menyerang beliau. Malah rakan-rakan aku dari PAS ada jugak yang taksub tu, kutuk Dr Mazlan, “kata dia ni memang tak suka Anwar lepastu UMNO guna la”..
Beradap la sikit.. tak boleh nak husnul zhon langsung.

Ni link blog kenapa kami tolak Anwar Ibrahim dan kenapa anda juga perlu tolak. Bukti turut disertakan. Khatam dulu baru balun aku dalam komen di bawah.

1. Anwar menentang keputusan Ulama Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan dan Majlis Syura Ulama’ PAS. http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/anwar-ibrahim-lawan-keputusan-majlis.html

2. Anwar Ibrahim bawak pluralisme agama laitu Islam sama benar dengan agama lain. Bagi dia matlamat sama cuma jalan agama berbeza http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/pluralisma-agama.html

3. Anwar Ibrahim bawak liberalisme agama, laitu atas nama kebebasan bersuara, hina nabi pun tak apa, juga berkata sistem khilafah ni hanya tradisi pun tak pa, undang2 Islam ni hanya undang2 keluarga sahaja dan lain2 http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/liberalisme-agama_27.html

4. Menerima anjuran program homoseksual sebagai salah satu perkara freedom of expression http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/membela-kaum-luth.html

5. Mengiktiraf negara haram Israel, bertentangan dengan fatwa ulama Malaysia dan dunia juga seperti Yusuf Qardhawi, Mustapha Mashoor, Wahbah Az Zuhaili dan lain-lain. http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/mengiktiraf-negara-haram-israel.html

6. Menerima murtad sebagai perkara dibenarkan dalam negara atas nama freedom of religion. http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/menerima-murtad-sebagai-konsep-dalam.html

7. Membela Salman Rushdie penulis buku yang menghina Rasul saw, atas nama kebebasan bersuara. http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/terima-salman-rushdie-hina-islam-dalam.html

8. Merayakan upacara agama lain, melakukan perkara yang diharamkan dalam Islam. http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/merayakan-upacara-agama-lain.html

9. Menipu seluruh rakyat lagi dan lagi dan lagi sehingga ke hari ini. http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/kasihanilah-anwar-yang-teraniaya.html

10. Penutup. http://sinarpermatangpauh.blogspot.com/2013/04/penutup.html

Orang seperti Anwar Ibrahim tidak layak menjadi pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat, berilah kepimpinan kepada orang baru pulak, pimpinan PAS lagi ramai yang tak menjual agama demi undi. Anwar Ibrahim tidak layak menjadi PM sekiranya PR menang. Dasar PKR sebagai parti paling banyak bertanding kerusi melebihi PAS, bukan bawa agenda Islam, bukan ada Majlis Syura, bukan dasar Islam pun.

Serahkan yang hak kepada mereka yang berhak.

Kepada yang kata kita menentang Anwar sebab kita anti-anwar, itu salah sama sekali! Kita menentang ideologi, dasar mencabar akidah yang dibawanya. Ideologi ini sepanjang masa akan menjadi ancaman buat islam, dan hari ini ideologi ini bertopengkan manusia bernama Anwar Ibrahim. Persoalannya, siapakah yang sudi menentang beliau dan menjadi katalis dalam tindakan ini?? Dan siapakah yang akan berada di sebelah sana membela tindakan Anwar Ibrahim?

Sesiapa yang ada fikrah Islam yang jelas pasti akan memilih menentang Anwar Ibrahim, bukannya setakat sembang lebat nak buat Islam tapi berdiam diri soal siapa Anwar Ibrahim; seterusnya membiarkan Dr Mazlan dicaci dihina walaupun perbuatan ini untuk kebaikan Ummat.

Kepada yang kata kita bergabung dengan pihak yang zalim, aku nak habaq orang yang zalim ialah orang yang membiarkan Anwar Ibrahim menjadi pemimpin, membiarkan ummat dirosakkan akidah mereka oleh manusia ini.

Ini bukan soal gabung dengan sesiapa, tapi soal nak halang orang yang tidak layak menjadi pemimpin, ketua di negara kita. Berlambak lagi yang layak, nak pilih orang macam ni buat apa? Jika ada individu yang berakidah sebegini dalam PKR, PAS, bahkan UMNO sekalipun maka semua orang wajib menolak orang ini tanpa kira parti.

Weight bertanding menentang Anwar Ibrahim tidak sama dengan weight menentang ahli biasa PKR. Kerana Anwar Ibrahim pemimpin PR, dan fikrah beliau akan dijadikan dasar negara sekiranya menang negara.

Takpayah cakap banyak. Kami bukan lawan PAS PKR tapi lawan figure yang bernama Anwar Ibrahim. Jangan dok ambik personal. Kawan2 aku yang PAS hampa dok kalut apa, kami bukan lawan PAS..PAS jugak untung kalau Anwar takdak, boleh PAS jadi kuat dalam PR. KALUT SUNGGUH.

Ni aku nak habaq mai, hampa khatam blog yang aku sertakan itu, lepas tu mai lah balun aku dan habaq benda kami buat ni betul atau salah!
Tak percaya lagi blog tu, pi jumpa ustaz-ustaz, bagi link blog tu suruh depa baca, dan tanya betui dak tindakan Dr Mazlan lawan Anwar?

Satu lagi, yang dok bubuh kesalahan konon ada ahli UMNO hina Nik Aziz kata kafir la, buat video seks konon Mustafa Ali la, apa kaitan dengan Dr Mazlan?
Boleh dak aku kata ahli PAS yang kata ahli UMNO kafir, tu Ustaz Hadi yang salah? Boleh ka? Aku nak bagi cayaq sikit otak jumud tu.

Akhlak ahli UMNO atau ahli PAS yang berjuta-juta orang mana boleh nak sama dengan Dr Mazlan atau Tuan Guru Haji Hadi. Ini tanggungjawab semua untuk dakwah, bukan bubuh kesalahan atas mana-mana pihak. Buang la sifat taksub tu…

Yang dok share sana sini konon Anwar dihina dimaki la dipenjara ditelanjangkan la apa, ya kita kesian kalau benda itu benar; tapi itu masih tidak menghilangkan kebenaran yang dengan akidah dia ni. Kalau Anwar jadi pemimpin negara dan dibawa bersamanya ideologi yang pelik dan bercanggah dengan syarak untuk dijadikan polisi negara, siapa nak tanggung? Maka haram untuk kita memilih beliau. Awat kalau kesian kat dia, dia jadi layak memimpin?

Takkan la kriteria layak nak jadi pemimpin itu kena buat orang kesian kat kita.

Ni orang yang fikrah Islam yang jelas, dia tak akan biaq orang macam Anwar ni jadi pemimpin. So something to ponder- pihak mana yang angkat Anwar jadi pemimpin? Parti UMNO ka? Dr Mazlan kena caci maki berkandaq, yang konon ‘fikrah jelas’ tu diammm ja, biaq kami kena maki.

Hampa sedaq dak kalau Dr Mazlan tak ambik tanggungjawab lawan Anwar dan Anwar menang dalam pilihanraya, dia jadi PM dan jadikan ideologi yang bercanggah islam tu dasar negara, hampa yang undi dia, hampa yang ‘fikrah jelas’ tu tanggung la dosa sebab mendiamkan kebenaran, seperti firman Allah dalam surah Al Baqarah ayat 42 “Dan janganlah kamu mencampurkan kebenaran dan kebatilan dan jangan kamu sembunyikan kebenaran itu sedang kamu mengetahuinya”.

Yang kata Dr Mazlan gila duit la apa, dia tu dah VP TM kot, tak payah susah2 dah cari kerja lain, gaji dah berlambak pun, nak pi turun menghadap caci maki hampa ni buat apa. Yang pembangkang yang kata Dr Mazlan lapaq kontrak kerajaan lepas pilihanraya, bukankah hampa yang kata Kerajaan BN akan jatuh, oleh itu memang tak cerdik la sapa yang pi bertanding time ni, baik duduk diam2 kat Telekom, takdak caci maki. Orang dah berkorban jiwa raga hampa dok kutuk Dr Mazlan.

Takpala… kami buat demi Islam. Allah jugak yang nak judge kami di akhirat. Bukannya manusia mana2 yang hina Dr Mazlan tu..
Semoga Allah beri kefahaman Islam kepada semua, kemaafan kepada yang menghina, dan rahmat ke atas rakyat Malaysia. Aaameen inshaAllah.

Wallahua’lam.
Ahmad Uzair Mazlan
Anak Dr Mazlan

p/s: sila share beramai-ramai termasuklah kepada mana-mana ustaz jika tidak yakin.

Punca Sebenar PAS Keluar BN 1978 Yang Tidak Didedahkan..

in Rencana by

539911_322321857896829_1254981469_n

PAS KELUAR BN

Antara punca sebenar krisis kelantan 1977 adalah berpunca dari pihak PAS itu sendiri. Malah di dalam portal PAS pusat itu sendiri menyatakan bahawa ianya bermula apabila timbulnya ketidak puasan hati PAS terhadap Menteri Besar ketika itu, Datuk Muhamed bin Nasir.

Yang tidak diceritakan oleh PAS:

1.Ada diantara pemimpin PAS Kelantan memfitnah dan menuduh Datuk Muhamed bin Nasir terlalu mengikut telunjuk UMNO-BN. Hakikatnya pd ketika itu UMNO-BN tidak pernah campur tangan dlm corak pemerintahan PAS (ketika itu). Malah, sedangkan ketika itu keputusan pemerintahan PAS Kelantan masih ditangan kuasa majoriti dewan undangan negeri.

2. Malah pada ketika itu juga terdapat usaha dalam PAS utk menjatuhkan Presiden PAS (ketika itu) Tan Sri Datuk Dr. Haji Mohd Asri bin Haji Muda. Usaha menjatuhkan Datuk Mohd Asri hanya kerana Datuk Mohd Asri adalah tokoh PAS yg bertanggungjawab membawa PAS menyertai Barisan Nasional pada tahun 1973.

3. Asas yg digunakan oleh sebahagian pemimpin PAS Kelantan (ketika itu) utk menolak Datuk Mohd Asri dan Dato’ Muhammad Nasir, hanya kerana selepas PRU 1973, PAS mempunyai kuasa majoriti dgn 22 kerusi dan UMNO hanya 13 kerusi, dan tidak memerlukan sebarang usaha bergabung antara PAS dan UMNO.

4. Dalam tempoh (1973-1978) Datuk Mohd Asri selaku Presiden PAS dan Dato’ Muhammad Nasir telah dikaitkan dengan pelbagai spekulasi dan masalah khususnya melibatkan Pas di Kelantan. Hakikatnya spekulasi dan tuduhan tersebut adalah hasil putar belit fakta sebahagian pemimpin dan ahli2 PAS yg tidak berpuashati dgn perpaduan PAS-UMNO.

5. Krisis Kepimipinan PAS Kelantan 1977 dikatakan timbul hasil ketidakpuasan hati terhadap Menteri Besar, Dato’Haji Muhammad Nasir. Beliau dipecat sebagai MB Kelantan oleh Pucuk Pemimpin PAS Kelantan itu sendiri.

6. Sementara Datuk Mohd Asri mula ditendang keluar oleh Pucuk Pemimpin PAS Kelantan selepas PRU 1978, dengan desakan-desakan supaya beliau meletakkan jawatan selaku Yang Dipertua Agung PAS, desakan yang datang dari beberapa pimpinan Pas antaranya dengan Pesuruhjaya Pas Kelantan dan Ketua Dewan Ulama’ Pas Pusat Haji Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat. Beliau akhirnya mengumumkan perletakan jawatan sebagi Yang Dipertua Agung PAS pada 23 Oktober 1982.

7. Krisis Kepimipinan PAS Kelantan 1977 ini yg membawa kepada undi tidak percaya kepada MB Kelantan pada 15 Oktober 1978. Apapun Kerajaan Pusat ketika itu menghormati keputusan yg dibuat oleh PAS Kelantan, atas dasar persefahaman dan tidak masuk campur dgn alasan yg diberi oleh PAS Kelantan itu dgn mendakwa perkara itu merupakan soal rumah tangga PAS.

8. Tumbangnya Dato’ Muhammad Nasir akibat perebutan kuasa dalam PAS, telah menyebabkn berlakulah rusuhan yg dimulakan oleh penyokong Nasir di Kota Bharu. Rusuhan ini telah mengakibatkan kerosakkan harta benda, mengancam nyawa dan keselamatan rakyat dan juga mengancam keselamatan negeri Kelantan.

9. Seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Tun Hussein Onn didalam ucapan beliau pada 9 Disember 1977, selaku perdana menteri ketika itu, belau harus bertanggungjawab di atas keselamatan negara dan kebajikan rakyat, yang dikhuatiri rusuhan diKelantan mungkin akan merebak ke negeri2 lain, dan mengengkang rusuhan seperti peristiwa 13mei berulang.

10. Pada November 1977, Parlimen Persekutuan meluluskan rang undang-undang darurat Kelantan yang meletakkan Kelantan ditadbir secara terus oleh Kerajaan Pusat.

11. Rang undang2 Darurat Kelantan dirangka bersama menteri2 PAS yg ketika itu masih lagi bersama-sama UMNO dalam jemaah Menteri. Dan diluluskan oleh Parlimen setelah mendapat persetujuan majoriti termasuk dr kalangan menteri PAS sendiri.

12. Setelah Kelantan dibawah Darurat. Datuk Mohd Asri menerima tekanan dari beberapa pimpinan Pas terutamanya Nik Aziz selaku Pesuruhjaya Pas Kelantan dan Ketua Dewan Ulama’ Pas Pusat yg dari awal begitu lantang menetang gabungan PAS-BN.

13. Hasil dari desakan itu, Haji Hassan Adli Arshad selaku Timb. Yang DiPertua Agung PAS dijadikan kambing hitam PAS apabila beliau dipecat oleh Datuk Mohd Asri yg kononnya beliau menjadi ketua menteri2 PAS yg menyokong rang undang-undang Darurat.

14. Malah beberapa pimpinan Pas yg menentang gabungan PAS-UMNO ketika itu terutamanya Nik Aziz mula menunjukkan sikap memberontak dalam perikatan gabungan PAS-UMNO, menetang setiap arahan dan perlaksanaan kemajuan yg dilakukan BN di Kelantan.

15. Pemberontakan dalaman ini memungkin barah berlaku dalam BN, hasil ketiadaan disiplin pemimpin PAS ini, telah menyebabkan UMNO terpaksa membuka tali yg mengabungkan PAS-UMNO.

16.Rentetan dari itu juga menyebabkan Krisis dalaman PAS yang kepada perpecahan PAS pada beberapa parti serpihan seperti Berjasa dan Hamim.

17. Keluarnya PAS dari gabungan BN-UMNO, telah menyaksikan satu PRK Kelantan diadakan pada Mac 1978.

18. Pada PRK Mac 1978, rakyat menjadi gempar setelah pekong yg selama ini disimpan oleh beberapa pimpinan Pas diantaranya Nik Aziz ketika itu terbongkar, apabila isu pemberian kontrak balak diberikan sewenang-wenangnya membuktikan bahawa PAS cuba menggadaikan Negeri Kelantan

sumber:Anakseberang

Anak Beranak Lim Gusar Bila Abdul Ghani Juga Tidak Takut Mati..

in Berita Nasional/Rencana by

Lim Kit Siang dan anaknya Lim Guan Eng tidak selesa apabila Menteri Besar Johor Datuk Abdul Ghani Othman mahu bertanding di Parlimen Gelang Patah, kata brulittlechina yang menterjemah akhbar berbahasa Cina, Sinchew Daily News, 6 April.ScreenHunter_95 Apr. 09 01.31

“Tetapi apa yang jelas dari terjemahan laporan Sinchew adalah kedua-dua Lim (Lim Kit Siang dan Lim Guan Eng) agak tidak selesa dengan spekulasi bahawa Ghani Othman, Menteri Besar Johor, merancang untuk berhadapan dengan Lim Kit Siang, Ahli Parlimen DAP Ipoh Timur, dalam pertempuran di Gelang Patah.

“Jelas sekali, mereka gagal menjangka bahawa ada juga seseorang di dalam BN, juga tidak takut untuk mati,”katanya.

Pada awalnya, DAP menjangkakan mereka berhadapan dengan MCA, namun tanpa disangka-sangka, tokoh Melayu-Islam dari UMNO pula muncul menawarkan diri.

Akhbar Sinchew melaporkan kenyataan Kit Siang semasa ceramah ‘UBAH’ di Johor yang berkata, “pemimpin DAP tidak takut kalah dan tidak takut mati, datang ke Gelang Patah adalah saat yang paling getir dan berisiko dalam perjalanan hidup politik saya, sudah tahu tempat bahaya namun tetap diharungi.

“Jika saya tidak masuk ke neraka siapa pula yang sanggup masuk ke neraka, jika kalah biarlah kalah, jika mati biarlah mati! ”

Blog siasahdaily melihat pertarungan Kit Siang-Abdul Ghani di Gelang Patah membuktikan DAP kekal sebagai parti perkauman Cina.

Pakatan Kit Siang-Anwar

brulittlechina dalam tulisannya bertajuk “Kit Siang’s challenger” lagi sekali menegaskan DAP tidak pernah menjangkakan calon UMNO bakal bertanding di Gelang Patah dan penawaran diri Abdul Ghani merosakkan pelan asal pakatan Lim Kit Siang- Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

“Saya mula-mula diberitahu niat Ghani untuk berhadapan Kit Siang di Gelang Patah beberapa minggu yang lalu apabila saya berada di Muar, “bandar Diraja”.

“Selepas Anwar yakin mengumumkan bahawa Kit Siang akan pergi ke Gelang Patah untuk menerajui serangan Pakatan terhadap kubu UMNO, Menteri Besar Johor telah memanggil mesyuarat di dalam bilik perang beliau untuk menilai keadaan.

“Beliau (Ghani) telah dimaklumkan bahawa Kit Siang dan Anwar merancang untuk menjadikan pilihan raya umum di Johor menjadi “urusan kaum berdarah” (bloody racial affair) dengan menghantar calon-calon DAP di setiap kerusi MCA, Johor.

“Ghani berkata beliau berharap untuk mengelakkan mana-mana senario yang boleh membuat keadaan lebih polarisasi perkauman. Dan dengan itu beliau telah menawarkan dirinya untuk berhadapan dengan Kit Siang.

“Dan ini telah merosakkan perancangan asal Kit Siang-Anwar,”katanya.

Apabila plan asal telah rosak, kata brulittlechina, Pakatan mula beralih kepada pelan B iaitu mengutuk MCA kerana kerusinya telah dirampas oleh UMNO.

Anwar U turn

brulittlechina turut menterjemah Sinchew Daily, 9 April bertajuk “Kit Siang kena main” yang mendedahkan kekecewaan Kit Siang apabila Anwar lari dari plan asal.

Plan asal Pakatan adalah Kit Siang berpindah dari Ipoh Timur, Perak ke Gelang Patah, Johor untuk mengetuai pasukan perang menggempur kubu UMNO di Johor, manakala Anwar pula berpindah dari Permatang Pauh ke salah satu tempat di Perak untuk mengetuai pasukan perang merampas kembali Perak daripada Barisan Nasional (BN).

Mungkin juga, meletakkan Naib Presiden Pas, Datuk Husam Musa dari Kelantan ke Putrajaya juga termasuk dalam plan asal tersebut.

Namun, Anwar membuat langkah spoil, dengan berpatah balik ke kubu asalnya, Parlimen Permatang Pauh.

“Anwar Ibrahim dengan lantang mahu bertanding di negeri Perak hanya selang dua hari sahaja, tiba-tiba pada 5 April semasa dalam ucapan ceramah politik beliau di Pulau Pinang beliau begitu merendah diri, beliau akur dengan sokongan pengundi beliau di Permatang Pauh dan membuat keputusan bertanding di Permatang Pauh, dan buat keputusan tidak keluar betanding di tempat lain.

“Sikap sudah mengalah sebelum bertanding, menyebabkan Lim Kit Siang pada jam 12.00 tengah malam tersebut semasa memberi ucapan dalam ceramah politik di Batu Pahat rasa sedih.

“Beliau berteriak di hadapan pengunjung “biarlah kalah, biarlah mati!” dalam keadaan dan saat itu, Lim Kit Siang terasa pilu dan tidak terkata, adakah setelah Anwar Ibrahim membelakangi beliau, masing-masing ada penjelasan yang tersendiri, “lapor Sinchew Daily.

“Pada lazimnya Lim Kit Siang menggunakan taktik simpati awam untuk mendapatkan sokongan daripada pengundi, taktik seperti ini telah beliau gunakan sepanjang arena kerjaya politik beliau, sebaliknya beliau tidak pernah menggunakan taktik “kalah dan mati” sebelum ini sebagai ungkapan kata-kata dalam musim PRU.

“Para penganalisa Pakatan Rakyat anggap emosi Lim Kit Siang berlaku sedemikian mungkin kerana apabila Anwar Ibrahim umumkan tidak bertanding di negeri Perak yang lebih memeranjatkan beliau, kerana beliau dengan semangat yang tinggi bertanding di negeri Johor, pengunduran Anwar Ibrahim seperti angkat kaki, telah merosakkan strategi Pakatan Rakyat, menyebabkan Lim Kit Siang berjuang secara berseorangan.

“Anwar Ibrahim merancang untuk bertanding dan dirikan khemah di negeri Perak, ini adalah satu persetujuan antara Lim Kit Siang dan Anwar Ibrahim sendiri. Anwar Ibrahim sudah bertapak di kerusi Parlimen di Permatang Pauh telah begitu lama, jika beliau benar-benar mahu berjuang dalam politik perlu beredar jauh dari situ, barulah akan difahami rakyat dan didoakan oleh rakyat, tidaklah pada saat-saat akhir masih mahu kekal di Permatang Pauh bercinta di situ dan dengar cakap isteri.

“Adakah Anwar Ibrahim berlakon sahaja, selepas Lim Kit Siang turun mahu bertanding di Selatan Semenanjung, lepas itu Anwar Ibrahim buat alasan tidak mahu keluar dari Permatang Pauh, ini menjadi satu persoalan.

“Kali ini Anwar Ibrahim telah merosakkan strategi, di mana UMNO mengejek Anwar Ibrahim tinggalkan kawasan pengundi sendiri, Anwar Ibrahim terpaksa kembali ke sarang di Permatang Pauh kerana beliau menjangkakan beliau mungkin akan kalah jika berdepan dengan calon UMNO yang begitu hebat, sebab itu beliau cepat-cepat tarik diri.

“Memang benar jika apa-apa yang tidak diingini berlaku kepada ketua umum pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat ini, akan menyebabkan satu kerugian besar kepada Pakatan Rakyat, kerana mereka akan kehilangan ketua umum.

“Sebaliknya cara Anwar Ibrahim berbolak balik dalam hal ini, menampakkan beliau kurang matang dan kurang terperinci dalam hal memimpin pasukan, dan beliau telah dipersendakan kerana perbuatan sendiri,”lapornya lagi.-AIDC

Razali : Perancangan Strategik DAP Tawan Putrajaya

Razali : Perancangan Strategik DAP Tawan Putrajaya II

Lim Kit Siang: Saya Mahu Pecahkan Kubu UMNO

Sinchew Daily : Lim Kit Siang Berang Anwar Buat U Turn

Abdul Ghani Anak Jantan Pertahankan Johor Ditembusi DAP

Strategi DAP : Kit Siang Dakwa Peluang Menang Di Gelang Patah Hanya 45 %

Adakah Kit Siang jujur mahu elak 13 Mei?

in DAP/Rencana by


Lim Kit Siang mahukan jaminan dan mencabar TPM Tan Sri Muhyiddin agar bertanggungjawab apabila mengungkit kembali kisah rusuhan 13 Mei,dakwa Kit Siang kononnya Umno BN mengamalkan politik perkauman dan taktik menakut nakutkan rakyat.

Dalam konvensyen pemuda kebangsaan baru baru ini Muhyiddin menekankan generasi muda Malaysia supaya bersatu padu untuk memastikan yang negara ini kekal stabil dan aman tenteram untuk mengelakkan berulangnya tragedi 13 Mei.Deklarasinya “Kami tidak mahu tragedi 13 Mei berulang.

Paling melucukan Kit Siang dalam responnya secara rasmi bagi pihak DAP dan Pakatan juga tidak mahu peristiwa hitam rusuhan 13 Mei berlaku.
Ultrakiasu chauvanis rasis Kit Siang juga memberi jaminan akan melakukan segala yang perlu untuk memastikan peristiwa ini tidak berlaku lagi.

Katanya lagi DAP dan Pakatan memberi kerjasama penuh bersama dengan Umno dan BN untuk menjamin tidak berulangnya semula peristiwa tragedi 13 Mei dalam pilihan raya umum yang akan datang.Bolehkah anda percaya kata kata Lim Kit Siang yang seluruh negara tahu beliau adalah salah seorang dalang yang terbabit secara langsung didalam peristiwa hitam tersebut.

Pisau perhatikan semenjak sebelum 2007 hinggalah sekarang,secara konsisten DAP menghasut kaum cina dengan pelbagai dakyah,kononnya bangsa cina tertindas dan dalam masa yang sama turut mencabar apa yang termaktub didalam perlembagaan.

Bukan itu saja DAP turut berperanan memainkan sentimen kebencian agama dan juga kebencian kaum. 2 resepi ini diguna pakai sejak dari dulu lagi dan sekarang ini amat berjaya.

Artikel 153 iaitu hak istimewa orang Melayu, Artikel 152 mengenai bahasa Melayu sebagai bahasa kebangsaan, Artikel 181 tentang raja-raja Melayu dan keempat, perkara yang tergolong kepada definisi hasutan menurut Akta Hasutan 1948 yang sekarang ini sudah ditukar kepada Akta Keharmonian Nasional hampir kesemuanya dilanggar ,dipijak dan juga dipersoalkan atas nama kebebasan bersuara.

Kesemua ini pada anggapan DAP dan pakatan adalah tuntutan hak yang mereka kira asas perjuangan mereka. Dalam pada itu mereka juga turut menguris perasaan bangsa melayu dengan pelbagai tindakan yang membabitkan kepentingan agama Islam.

DAP dan pakatan mendesak,pijak dan perlekehkan apa yang termaktub didalam perlembagaan dan mengharapkan pihak yang lain tidak bangkit bersuara dan membantah? Ibarat DAP mahukan satu keistimewaan untuk menghina orang lain dan mengharapkan tidak ada tindak balas? Begitu!?

Apakah DAP dan Kit Siang mengharapkan majoriti kaum yang dominan dinegara ini berpeluk tubuh apabila diasak dan dihina?

Kepada siapa Lim Kit Siang mahu berbohong? Pisau pernah dedahkan bahawa pecah dan perintah adalah sebahagian agenda utama hagemoni DAP dalam melaksanakan Malaysian Malaysa yakni dakwah mereka sudah pun berjaya dianuti oleh PAS .PKR dengan liberal dan pluralnya kesemua ini asakan kepada apa yang menjadi asas keharmonian sesama kaum dinegara ini yang merdeka sejak 50 tahun yang dahulu.

Pisau pernah dedahkan keadaan suasana politik pada masa sekarang tak ubah sepertimana berlakunya pasca 1969, Skrip 1969 dikitar semula pengarahnya sama (Kit Siang)cuma pemainnya adalah berbeza …

anda boleh rujuk artikel disebalik rahsia besar “Asal Bukan Umno”

Pisau menekankan agar anda faham apa yang sebenarnya berlaku dan akan kegagalan kita sendiri mempelajari daripada sejarah.

rujuk siri artikel Pisau sebelum ini

DAP Anti Umno,Rahsia Di Sebalik Kempen “Asal Bukan Umno” :klik sini

DAP Anti Umno:Rahsia Di Sebalik Kempen “Asal Bukan Umno” Pt2 Klik sini

Rahsia Terbongkar ! Agenda DAP PAP Penyatuan Malaysia Singapura
::Klik sini

Malaysia dikuasai oleh DAP dan PAP. Melayu & Bumiputra Majoriti menjadi minoriti.Raja Melayu di Singkirkan .Lahirnya sebuah negara Republik Bersatu Rakyat Malaysia :KLIK SINI

Lim Kit Siang sebolehnya tidak mahu rakyat mengingati sejarah penglibatan secara langsung DAP dan PAP dalam kejadian rusuhan paling buruk. Mereka tahu generasi sekarang berjaya dimomokkan dengan pelbagai dakyah agar terpengaruh akan ideologi politik mereka.

Natijahnya daripada itu kita dapat lihat bagaiman kelompok melayu liberal yang kononnya meletakkan diri mereka sebagai lebih terbuka dan pertikaikan sendiri akan hak kepentingan kaum yang dominan dinegara ini sedangkan mereka sendiri adalah produk DEB.

Kelicikan Kit Siang yang saling tak tak tumpah seperti anaknya Lim Guan Eng yang anda harus tahu..

Perhatikan kenyataan Lim Kit Siang dan seluruh pemimpin pakatan dan bandingkan pepatah arab ini.

Ingat pepatah arab “Dia pukul orang dia mengadu bahawa orang lain pukul dia, dia memaki orang, dia mengadu orang lain memaki dia”

Kata Kit Siang sekarang ini zaman sudah berbeza dan beliau secara terbuka mahukan penubuhan suruhanjaya siasatan diraja terhadap sebab tercetusnya kejadian ini, dakwanya lagi keadaan dewasa ini jauh berbeza berbanding dengan apa yang berlaku 43 tahun lalu.

Jika dibandingkan suasana politik sekarang ini apa yang berlaku 43 tahun lepas tidak jauh bezanya . Kit Siang awal awal lagi cuba menutup kerja jahat DAP dengan menuduh hanya puak yang tidak bertanggungjawab, antinasional dan pengkhianat akan cuba memutarbelitkan kemenangan Pakatan dalam PRU13 sebagai satu kemenangan antara satu kaum terhadap kaum yang lain, untuk memberi justifikasi kepada idea liar rusuhan 13 Mei, di mana apa-apa kemenangan rakyat Malaysia berbilang kaum.

Kononnya pakatan akan memperolehi kemenangan pada PRU13,bagaikan ahli nujum Kit Siang seolah memberi isyarat bahawa kemenangan BN pada PRU13 nanti adalah berdasarkan penipuan.Isyarat ini kita harus jelas bahawa sejak dari awal lagi BERSIH yang dilaungkan sebenarnya adalah satu tindakan preamptive untuk mengharamkan setiap keputusan pilihanraya ke 13 nanti.

Apa akan terjadi? Sudah pasti gerembolan pakatan akan dihasut untuk turun dijalan raya membantah kononnya kemenangan BN pada PRU13 nanti adalah satu penipuan.

 

Anda harus faham , Yang pertama kononnya jika PRU13 Pakatan menang tuduhan kalangan pro BN akan merusuh semasa berlakunya transisi dari BN ke Pakatan ia adalah satu tindakan preamptive pakatan sedangkan ketika 5 negeri tumbang ke tangan pakatan jelas tidak ada apa apa yang berlaku. Anda perhatikan apa yang berlaku apabila Perak jatuh kembali ketangan BN,siapakah yang merusuh?

Yang kedua ,Jika PRU13 BN menang ,BERSIH akan turun dijalan raya melakukan revolusi menolak bulat bulat setiap keputusan pilihanraya sedangkan mereka sejak dari awal lagi sedar bahawa pakatan tidak akan menang PRU13.

Yang terkini dalam satu forum di Permatang Pauh,Chegu Bard dan A Samad Said melaungkan agar rakyat turun kejalan raya jika pakatan kalah semasa PRU13 nanti.Kenapa menghasut dan membuat ugutan?

(Pisau pernah lapurkan mesyuarat sulit pakatan para pemimpin akui mereka gagal ke Putrajaya Pru13 nanti):klik sini , sini dan sini , Malah baru baru ini Lim Guan Eng dalam satu mesyuarat turut mengakui amat sukar mempertahankan momentum sokongan rakyat terhadap BN.

Pakatan sekarang ini memainkan persepsi mereka akan menang pada PRU13 untuk mempengaruhi akan kegagalan pakatan ke Putrajaya hanya disebabkan penipuan sedangkan realitinya mereka menyedari tidak akan sama sekali berjaya meraih undi berbanding 2008.

Anda lihat bagaimana persepsi ini digarap dan dimainkan..

“Lim Kit Siang seolah mahu mengikat tangan dan menutup mulut Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak.Kit Siang mencabar agar Najib harus berani mengambil risiko dan menjawab satu soalan yang telah lama di tujukan berulang kali dalam tempoh tiga tahun ini – sama ada beliau akan membuat satu pengumuman deklarasi akan menerima kata putus rakyat jelata dalam PRU13, termasuklah kerajaan baru Pakatan yang akan menggantikan BN di Putrajaya.

Dan beliau sendiri akan menjamin dan memastikan peralihan kuasa persekutuan secara aman untuk kali pertamanya dalam sejarah negara ini, untuk memaklumkan kepada warga dunia bahawa Malaysia menjadi negara dengan “sistem demokrasi yang terbaik di dunia”! “

Soalnya apakah Pakatan berani membuat pengumuma deklarasi yang sama menerima kekalahan mereka tanpa melakukan rusuhan dan revoulusi dijalan raya dan menghapuskan pertubuhan haram Bersih? Sudah pasti tidak.

Berdasarkan pengamatan Pisau sejak 2008 sehinggalah sekarang yang pasti PRU13 adalah satu pilihanraya terburuk apabila perancangan sudah pun dibuat untuk menimbulkan kekacauan pada setiap peti undi DUN dan Parlimen.

Pergaduhan dan pertumpahan darah pasti akan berlaku apabila penyokong pakatan dihasut kononnya berlaku penipuan semasa pembuangan undi, kemudian dibantah sebelum tempoh pembuangan undi habis. Selepas pengumuman dibuat, kemenangan pihak lawan tidak akan diiktiraf. Dan bantahan besar besaran akan dibuat hinggalah mencetuskan rusuhan besar besaran diseluruh negara.

Jom Baca artikel bersiri Pisau : Klik Sini

Pisau kata “DAP sesuka hati boleh menghina bangsa melayu,agama Islam tapi jika kita pertahankan hak bangsa,agama akan dituduh rasis.. boleh macam tu?”

Singapura Israel di ASIA? Penang?

in Rencana by

Pisau menekankan agar anda faham apa yang sebenarnya berlaku dan akan kegagalan kita sendiri mempelajari daripada sejarah.

rujuk siri artikel Pisau sebelum ini

DAP Anti Umno,Rahsia Di Sebalik Kempen “Asal Bukan Umno” :klik sini

DAP Anti Umno:Rahsia Di Sebalik Kempen “Asal Bukan Umno” Pt2 Klik sini

Rahsia Terbongkar ! Agenda DAP PAP Penyatuan Malaysia Singapura::Klik sini

Malaysia dikuasai oleh DAP dan PAP. Melayu & Bumiputra Majoriti menjadi minoriti.Raja Melayu di Singkirkan .Lahirnya sebuah negara Republik Bersatu Rakyat Malaysia :KLIK SINI

Menurut sebuah laman konsultan pertahanan india, menjelaskan apabila Singapura berpisah dari Malaysia pada tahun 1963, pada masa yang sama tentera British juga telah mengambil keputusan untuk meninggalkan Asia.

Rentetan itu telah menyebabkan Lee Kuan Yew yang masa itu menjadi Perdana Menteri Singapura telah meminta bantuan India untuk mambangunkan Angkatan Tentera dan juga Hubungan Luar. Namun India hanya bersetuju untuk membantu dalam bidang Hal Ehwal Hubungan Luar sahaja, bagaimanapun Lt Gen Mattew Thomas kemudian menjadi penasihat tentera pada tahun 70an.


Singapura selepas itu meminta bantuan daripada Israel dan kemudian mengambil Afrika Selatan sebagai model dan mengunakan pendekatan tentera mengikut cara Khidmat Wajib Switzerland. Kini negara tersebut dikatakan memperuntukkan belanjawan ketenteraan sebanyak $4.5 Billion dollar untuk negara yang mempunyai penduduk hampir tiga juta.

Kisah kejayaan tentera Singapura menurut laman tersebut adalah hasil usaha dari Lee Kuan Yew dan dibantu oleh anaknya Brig Gen Lee Hsein Leong yang mengambil alih jawatan Perdana Menteri daripada Goh Chok Tong yang sekarang ini merupakan Menteri Kanan.


Singapura juga mempunyai kerjasama dengan India dalam bidang ketenteraan melalui kerjasama dengan DRDO dan Tentera Laut India,Pada tahun 2004 dikatakan telah diadakan latihan bersama angkatan tentera singapura dengan angkatan tentera India (IAF). Adanya hubungan ini antara Singapura dan India ini akan memberi keuntungan kepada India kerana Singapura sudah tentu akan melabur di India dan seterusnya akan membantu ekonomi India berkembang.

Admiral Teo Che Hean menerangkan kepada semua pegawai kanan India yang melawat Singapura iaitu hubungan strategik yang kuat adalah penting untuk perniagaan. Tentera Laut India telah mendapat manfaat dengan menghantar kapal-kapalnya ke Singapura dan sekarang mempunyai kekuatan kewangan untuk menghantar kapal mengisi minyak.

Artikel dibawah ini pula ditulis oleh Amnon Barzilai menceritakan dengan terperinci sejarah hubungan ketenteraan Singapura dan Israel.


Hubungan Cinta Rahsia, Dalam Gelap

(Sekumpulan pegawai pertahanan Israel yang digelar ‘Mexicans’, membantu Singapura menubuhkan tenteranya. Ianya satu permulaan hubungan yang amat istimewa)

Oleh Amnon Barzilai

Krismas, 1965, adalah tarikh tidak rasmi bermulanya hubungan cinta yang hebat antara Israel dan Singapura yang amat dirahsiakan. Media antarabangsa, seperti media Israel cuba menyiarkan kisah ini. Sedikit demi sedikit maklumat dibocorkan, ada yang disiarkan, ada yang dinafikan ada yang diabaikan. Israel, seperti biasa ingin memberitahu rakan-rakan mereka tetapi berjaya mengekang kemahuan tersebut. Mereka takut hubungan tersebut akan berakhir sekiranya ianya diketahui umum. Israel mengenakan sekatan berkenaan kisah ini dan rahsia ini tersimpan. Sehinggalah pihak lagi satu tidak dapat lagi merahsiakannya.

Dalam bukunya, “From Third World to First: The Singapore Story 1965-2000,” yang diterbitkan padatahun 2000, Lee Kuan Yew, pengasas dan Perdana Menteri pertama Singapura mendedahkan rahsia yang disimpan selama hampir 40 tahun. Hakikatnya

Tentera Israel yang telah mengasaskan tentera Singapura.

Misi ketenteraan Israel diketuai oleh Yaakov (Jack) Elazari, ketika itu berpangkat kolonel, kemudian dinaik pangkat ke brigadier jeneral. Setelah meninggalkan tentera,beliau menjadi penasihat tentera Singapura. Diameninggal dunia 15 tahun lalu.
then a colonel, who waslater promoted to brigadier general. After leaving the army, he became a consultant to the Singaporean army. He died 15 years ago.

“Untuk mengaburi kehadiran mereka, kita gelarkan mereka ‘Mexican’, menurut Lee Kuan Yew.Tentera Singapura hari ini adalah yang terkuat dan termoden di Asia Tenggara.

Hubungan pertahanan antara Israel dan Singapura bertambah erat dan diperluaskan,dan sekarang ianya meliputi hubungan kerjasama bidang industri ketenteraan. Bidang kerjasama, menurut sumberasing, tentera Singapura adalah merupakan pelanggan utama Israel dalam bidang pertempuran dan teknologi ketenteraan. Industri kapal terbang Singapura bekerjasama dengan Israel dan Elbit Systems untukmenaik taraf pesawat pejuat F-5 Tentera Udara Turki.Beberapa tahun lalu, Menteri Pertahanan Singapura mendedahkan peluru berpandu anti kereta kebal jenis Gil diusahakan dengan kerjasama kedua-dua negara.


Dikelilingi Orang Islam Lee Kuan Yew menerangkan pentingnya merahsiakan perkara ini pada kawan rapatnya di peringkat pimpinan, dan menteri pertahanan pertama, Dr. Goh Keng Swee. “Kita mesti mempastikan ketibaan Israel tidak diketahui umum, supaya tidak mendatangkan tentangan dari orang Islam yang tinggal di Malaysia dan Singapura” menurut Lee Kuan Yew. Ini adalah masalah Singapura. Penduduk pulau yang kecil ini 670 kilometer persegi (Israel 30 kali lebih luas) majoritinya berbangsa Cina, dan mereka berada diantara dua negara Islam iaitu Malaysia dan Indonesia. Sehingga 1965, Singapura masih lagi sebahagian Malaysia. Pada tahun tersebut British mengambil keputusan untuk keluar dari jajahannya ke timur Terusan Suez. Dalam proses yang pantas Singapura dipisahkan daripada Malaysia.

Singapura mengisytiharkan kemerdekaan pada 9 Ogos1965. Dan pada masa tersebut ia hanya mempunyai dua rejimen infantri, yang telah ditubuhkan dan diketuai oleh pegawai British. Dua pertiga tenteranya bukannya penduduk Singapura, dan pemimpin mereka tidak yakin dengan kekuatan tenteranya. Menteri Pertahanan, Goh,menghubungi Mordechai Kidron, bekas duta Israel ke Thailand untuk meminta bantuan. Kidron tiba di Singapura dalam beberapa hari bersama Hezi Carmeldari Mossad. “Goh memberitahu kita hanya Israel, negara kecil yang dikelilingi negara umat Islam, dengan tentera yang kuat, boleh membantu mereka membina tentera yang kuat, tentera yang dinamik”,menurut Carmel. Kedua-dua orang Israel menemui Lee,yang menulis “beritahu Keng Swee untuk menunggu dulu sehingga Lal Bahadur Shastri, Perdana Menteri India, dan Presiden Nasser dari Mesir membalas surat saya untuk membentuk tentera Singapura”.

Adalah tidak pasti samada Lee percaya India dan Mesir mampu atau berminat untuk membentuk tentera Singapura. Ramai Israel percaya ianya adalah taktik semata-mata. Selepas beberapa minggu India dan Mesir mengucapkan tahniah diatas kemerdekaan mereka tetapi tidak menawarkan bantuan ketenteraan. Lee mengarahkan Goh untuk mengubungi terus pegawai Israel.

Pada masa yang sama, sejurus laporan oleh Kidron dan Carmel, pertahanan Israel menghantar bantuan ketenteraan kepada Singapura. Dalam perbincangan yang dikendalikan oleh Ketua Turus Yitzhak Rabin, dengan kehadiran Timbalan Ketua Turus dan Pengarah Bahagian Operasi , Ezer Weizmann, telah diputuskan untuk melantik Major General Rehavam Ze’evi, ketika itu Timbalan Bahagian Operasi, bertanggungjawab untuk membina tentera Singapura. Ze’evi (digelar”Gandhi” ) melawat Singapura secara rahsia dan memulakan persiapan sekembalinya. “Gandhi ingin membentuk tentera Singapura yang ideal, sesuatu yang kita tidak buat disini”, menurut Carmel. “Dengan tidak membentuk Kementerian Pertahanan dan Staf Jeneral, Gandhi mencadangkan organisasi bersepadu, struktur yang lebih ekonomi. Jadi tidak akan ada terlalu ramai jeneral dan terlalu sedikit askar biasa”

Ze’evi melantik Elazari, yang bekerja dibawahnya dalam Bahagian Operasi, sebagai mengetuai kumpulan pembentukan. Lieutenant Colonel Yehuda Golan, ketika itu mengetuai divisyen armor (dia bersara dari tentera Israel berpangkat brigadier general), ditambah dalam kumpulan tersebut. Beberapa ahli kumpulan “menumpukan dalam persiapan untuk membina kem tentera”, menurut Golan. Pada mulanya mereka mereka menghasilkan buku “Brown Book,” berkatian doktrin peperangan, kemudian buku “Blue Book,” mengenai pembentukan KementerianPertahanan dan badan perisikan. Brown Book telah diterjemah ke Bahasa Inggeris dan dihantar ke kerajaan Singapura.

Pada Oktober 1965, perwakilan tentera dari Singapura tiba di Israel.“Perwakilan tersebut datang untuk memberitahu kita :‘Tahniah, tapi untuk melaksanakan buku ini, awak dijemput datang ke Singapura,’” menurut Golan. Sebelum berlepas, ahli-ahli misi ketenteraan berjumpa Ketua Turus Biro. “Sahabat sekelian,” kata Rabin, “Saya ingin memperingatkan beberapa perkara. Pertama, kita bukannya hendak menjadikan Singapura sebagai jajahan Israel. Tugas awak ialah mengajar mereka kerjaya tentera, supaya mereka boleh berdikari menguruskan tentera mereka. Kejayaan awal ialah adalah apabila mereka berjaya menguruskan tentera mereka sendiri.Kedua, awak pergi ke sana bukan untuk memberi arahan tetapi memberi nasihat kepada mereka. Dan ketiga, awak semua bukan pedagang senjata. Bila awak membuat nasihat untuk pembelian senjata, gunakan pertimbangan professional ketenteraan. Jangan ambil kira keputusan mereka samada mereka hendak membeli dengan kita atau orang lain”.Bangun Jam 5:30 pagi

Pada 24 Disember 1965, lima bulan selepas Singapura menjadi negara merdeka, enam pegawai pertahanan Israel dan keluarga mereka berlepas untuk misi yang dirahsiakan. “Elazari dan dua pegawai lain menguruskan penubuhan Kementerian Pertahanan.” Menurut Golan.“Tugas saya dengan tiga pegawai lain ialah untuk menubuhkan tentera”.
Elazari bekerja mengikut beberapa prinsip asas, dimana tidak lari dari kumpulan asal Israel. Pertama untuk membentuk kader komander dan jurulatih tempatan. Kedua, bahan arahan bertulis dibuat oleh kadet yang dilatih sebagai pegawai. Dan ketiga latihan praktikal akan dikendalikan oleh jurulatih Singapura.

“Kita hendak melatih 40-50 orang yang mempunyai pengalaman tentera dan bersedia untuk bekhidmat dalam kerjaya ketenteraan.” Golan mengulas. “Kita menyuruh mereka melantik seorang sebagai komander. Sebagai ketua kumpulan, kadet-kadet tersebut melantik seorang berketurunan India Kirpa Ram Vij, yang seterusnya akan menjadi Ketua Turus Tentera. Selama tiga bulan kita berikan kursus intensif.”

Kursus pertama ialah format tentera Israel , bangun jam 5.30 pagi, kemas diri, kawad. Latihan bermula jam7:30 pagi hingga 1 tengahari. “Selepas beberapa hari berlatih, sekumpulan kadet berjumpa saya dan berkata,‘ ‘Colonel Golan, orang-orang Arab tidak duduk atas kepala kita? Kenapa kita buat kerja gila ini?’ Saya panggil Elazari dan beritahu keadaan yang berlaku.Beberapa hari kemudian dia datang bersama Menteri Pertahanan Dr. Goh, dan memberitahu kadet-kadet, `Buat apa yang Colonel Golan suruh , atau tidak awak kena buat dua kali ganda’. Dalam masa yang sama kumpulan pegawai Israel yang lain menyelia pembinaan kem tentera yang pertama berdasakan pelan Kor Jurutera Israel. Pembinaan kem tentera siap dalam masa tiga bulan. Dalam tempoh kurang setahun, kumpulan Israel telah mengendalikan kursus untuk rekrut baru, kursus ketua platun dan kursus pegawai, menurut pelan yang dihantar dari Israel. Seramai 200 komander telah dilatih.

Penganggur Bukannya Tentera

Sebaik sahaja staf komander siap, pasukan tentera mula dibentuk. Israel telah berssedia menubuhkan dua lagi rejimen infantri, mengikut model tentera Israel, setiap rejimen mempunyai tiga kompeni askar raifel, satu kompeni tambahan dan satu kompeni pengurusan –sejumlah 600 tentera. Lieutenant Colonel Moshe Shefi, seorang jurulatih kursus komander kompeni telah dihantar menjadi penasihat. who was an instructor in acompany commanders course, was sent as an adviser.”Kami mendapati ada penentangan saikolgi untuk mengambil rekrut di Singapura,” katanya. “Dari 10 kerjaya, kerjaya tentera adalah yang terakhir. Pertama ialah artis, kemudian ahli falsafah, kemudian guru dan ahli perniagaan, dan pencuri tempat kesembilan. Kerjaya tentera adalah kerjaya memalukan di Singapura.Di Singapura , rekrut adalah untuk mengatasi pengangguran.”

Pegawai Israel mempunyai masalah. Untuk mengelakkan diri , kebanyakan pemuda yang dipilih (usia 18-24 tahun) yang berbangsa Cina menunjukkan bukti mereka telah bekerja. 70 peratus calon adalah penganggur dan berasal dari Malaysia.. Elazari dan Golan mengadu pada Lee dan Goh, tapi perdana menteri bertegas, “saya nak awak latih orang yang paling primitif di negara ini, yang tidak berpelajaran dan menganggur,’ kata Lee.

Terkejut, pegawai Israel cuba memujuk Lee untuk memberi pertimbangan, tapi dia bertegas : “Dalam perang dunia kedua, saya lihat tentera British dan tentera Jepun. Semua tentera British bijak dan berpelajaran. Tapi sebagai tentera mereka tak berguna. Tentera British yang primitif menerima arahan dan melaksanakannya, dan mereka tentera yang luar biasa.Hakikatnya tentera Jepun menewaskan tentera British”.

Kata Golan, “Yaakov dan saya cuba menerangkan kepada beliau bukan persoalan pelajaran tetapi ialah motivasi. Tentera Jepun bermotivasi kerana mereka berjuang kerana maharaja, yang dianggap sebagai tuhan.Mereka rela berkorban kerana dia. Apa motivasi yang tentera British ada, yang berjuang beribu kilometer dari negara mereka ?”

Penjelasan mengenai semangat berjuang dan bagaimana untuk memberikan motivasi telah diterima Lee.Selain daripada khidmat wajib dan kerjaya tentera, Singapura juga mengambil contoh khidmat simpanan tentera Israel. Setiap tentera yang tamat berkhidmat biasa dikehendaki berkhidmat lagi 13 tahun, sehingga umur 33 tahun.Sistem untuk mobilasi khidmat ini telah ditubuhkan dan kementerian pertahanan melakasanakan latihan mengejut.

Disebabkan saiz yang kecil dan kurang tempat untuk berlatih, Singapura menubuhkan beberapa kem latihan dengan beberapa negara jiran.

Kejutan Kereta Kebal

Kebimbangan serangan tentera Malaysia, dan pergerakan pantas tentera Singapura, memerlukan keperluan tambahan. Dengan kewujudan infantri, pegawai Israel melakukan kajian mendalam pertempuran tentera Jepun di Asia Tenggara semasa perang dunia kedua dan bagaimana mereka berjaya menceroboh Malaysia dan Singapura. Shefi diberi tugas untuk memberikan ceramah mengenai perkara ini kepada kerajaan Singapura.

Dari apa yang dipelajari Israel, perang antara askar Jepun dan British, mereka membentuk tentera laut daripada sampan-sampan. “ Bot tesebut dibuat dari kayu yang baik dan boleh membawa 10 ke 15 orang askar, dan sesuai digunakan di laut dan sungai,” kata Golan.“Dalam laut bergelora mereka boleh guna pendayung atau enjin. Kita beritahu Singapura untuk membeli 20 bot dan kita bentuk kem kecil untuk kompeni infantri berlatih melakukan serangan dan mencari arah”.

Kolonel bersara Asher Dar berkata, “Kumpulan kedua sampai Singapura dan melaksanakan apa yang Yehuda Golan bentuk sebagai doktrin peperangan. Kita melatih serangan menggunakan bot kecil dan meriam peluru hidup. Bila ketua bahagian latihan , Yitzhak Hofi, melawat Singapura , kita membuat latihan mendarat briged infantri dan menggunakan perahu layar sejauh 12 kilometer.”

Penungguan perang enam hari 1967 adalah memeritkan kepada kumpulan Israel di Singapura. “Kami berasa lega Israel tidak tewas jika tidak tentera Singapura akan hilang keyakinan”, kata Lee , menurut jurulatih Israel. Pada Januari 1968 , Singapura mengambil keputusan untuk menubuhkan Kor Armor. Dalam penuh kerahsiaan, satu perjanjian ditandatangani untuk membeli 72 buah kereta kebal AMX-13 dari tentera Israel. Ianya satu keputusan yang berani. Malaysia, jiran yang besar, tiada kereta kebal.

Semasa Hari Merdeka, Ogos 1969, kejutan yang amat besar menanti tetamu, termasuk Menteri PertahananMalaysia : 30 kereta kebal melakukan lintas hormat.“Ianya mempunyai kesan dramatik”, Lee menulis. Malaysia melahirkan kebimbangan. Menteri Pertahanan Singapura cuba memujuk kerajaan Malaysia menyatakan ianya bukanlah tujuan untuk persengketaan.

Selepas kejayaan Israel pada 1967, dinding kerahsiaan mula terbuka. Perwakilan Singapura di Bangsa-BangsaBersatu tidak mengundi resolusi untuk mengutuk Israel oleh negara Arab. Hubungan diplomatik penuh mula terjalin. Pada Oktober 1968 Lee membenarkan Israel menubuhkan misi perdagangan dan Mei 1969 Singapura membenarkan Israel mendirikan kedutaan. Status misi ketenteraan Israel di Singapura diperkukuhkan, dan diketuai oleh mereka yang berpangkat brigadier jeneral.

 

Asas Penubuhan Tentera Udara

Kumpulan pegawai Israel yang kecil di Singapura diperkuatkan dengan penasihat tentera dalam pelbagai bidang. Ketua Turus Kor Armor, Major General Abraham Adan, tiba untuk memberikan nasihat pembelian kenderaan perisai. Pada tahun 1968, Adam Tzivoni, kolonel bersara yang mengetuai bahagian perancangan dan senjata tentera udara, telah dilantik sebagai penasihat Simgapura untuk membentuk tentera udara.

 

“Sebagai ganti pengeluaran tentera British, kerajaan British memberi Singapura geran sebanyak 50 juta pound untuk membeli pesawat British, helikopter dan peluru berpandu,” Tzivoni memberitahu. “British tidak sukakan saya. Tugas saya ialah untuk meluluskan perjanjian. Tetapi nampaknya British ingin menjual senjata tidak berguna kepada Simgapura. Selain perjanjian pembelian Hunter, saya menolak semua perjanjian lain.” Dibawah pengawasan Tzivoni, sekolah penerbangan dibentuk di Singapura, juga sekolah teknikal, satu skuadron helikopter Alouette dan meriam anti pesawat 40 mm telah dibeli.


Uzi (senjata) dan Lagu Kawad Israel

 

Selepas pembentukan rejiman infantri tentera Singapura, timbul persoalan senjata apa harus digunakan. Pegawai-pegawai mahukan Uzi, sub mesingan Israel. Pegawai Israel menolak cadangan tersebut. Benar, Uzi senjata yang hebat pada tahun 1960, tapi untuk jarak dekat sahaja.

 

Tentera memerlukan raifel penyerang. Wakil dari tentera Israel menggesa kementerian pertahanan menjual raifel baru Gali. Tapi kumpulan berkenaan berpendapat senjata tersebut belum bersedia lalu mencadangkan M-16 Amerika.

 

Satu lagi masalah ialah keputusan untuk membeli mortar. Rejimen infantri dilengkapi dengan 60 – 52 mm dan 18 mm mortar (meriam katak). Senjata ini dihasilkan dan dikeluarkan oleh syarikat Soltam di bandar Yokne’am, dijual oleh kementerian pertahanan Israel dan diekspot ke seluruh dunia. “Walaupun kita fikir ini ialah mortar terbaik, kita tidak mencadangkannya sebaliknya menggunakan badan perunding bebas untuk mengambil keputusan,” menurut Yehuda Golan.

“Israel menekankan kemahiran ketenteraan dan motivasi yang tinggi. Kepintaran berkawad dan pertunjukan ketenteraan, tentera Singapura tidak pernah belajar dari `Mexicans.’ Apa yang tentera Singapura belajar adalah dari pegawai British yang mengetuai dua rejimen infantri yang awal”, tulis Lee.

 

“Motto kita ialah kita tidak akan menyibuk apa yang Singapura boleh buat sendiri,” menurut Golan. “Mereka ingin mengatur perbarisan Hari Kemerdekaan mereka sendiri. Kami berkata perbarisan ketenteraan menggambarkan mentaliti negara dan sejarahnya.” Singapura tidak menjadikan ia satu isu. Bagaimana pun mereka mempunyai masalah yang memerlukan penyelesaian segera – apa rentak hendak dimainkan ketika tentera sedang berkawad. Ketua misi Israel, Yaakov Elazari, membawa nota lagu dari Israel dan tentera Singapura berkawad diiringi lagu kawad Israel.

Buku Panduan Pertempuran Hutan

Pihak Singapura mengejutkan pegawai Israel apabila mereka menyatakan mereka perlukan kursus tempur dalam hutan. Singapura cuma ada hutan kecil seluas lima kilometer persegi, tapi negara jiran mempunyai hutan yang besar. Kata Yehuda Golan “ : Saya beritahu mereka benar, tapi saya bukanlah orangnya, kerana saya tidak tahu apa-apa perang di hutan.” Bagaimanapun pegawai Israel cuba mengatasinya. Keputusan dibuat untuk menghantar dua pegawai Singapura sebagai tetamu tentera Malaysia dalam kursus pertempuran dalam hutan.

 

“Tiga bulan kemudian, dua pegawai tersebut pulang dengan pengalaman yang diperolehi di Malaysia, dan kami membuat latihan tempur dalam hutan selepas itu,” menurut Golan. “Atas dasar ingin tahu, saya juga turut serta. Ianya begitu teruk – jelas mereka diajar cara British ketika perang dunia kedua. Saya mengambil keputusan melatih 10 orang pegawai. Kami memasuki hutan dan memulakan permainan perang. Kami latih bidang pandu arah, membentuk pasukan, menyerang dan mencari. Kita merujuk kepada buku panduan perang Amerika di Vietnam. Kita membangunkan cara pandu arah malam. Kita belajar bagaimana berfungsi sebagai sebuah kompeni tempur dalam hutan tebal. Selepas beberapa minggu latihan, saya menulis buku panduan perang dalam hutan untuk Tentera Singapura”

 

Jika begini asas pembentukan Singapura, maknanya Lee Kuan Yew sememangnya sudah merancang dengan bantuan orang Yahudi untuk menjatuhkan kuasa orang Islam di Asia Tenggara. Dan sebab itu tidak hairan jika kita katakan tangan2 Yahudi sebenarnya yang menyebabkan sering berlaku pertelagahan dan hubungan tidak mesra di antara Singapura dan negara sekitarnya.-pochong

Pisau kata “menurut sumber dalaman DAP Guan Eng mempunyai pejabat khas yang dibiayai oleh PAP di Singapura,pegawai yang bertugas di sana adalah yahudi yang membantu merancang segala tindakan Guan Eng di Pulau Pinang”

 

Misteri Entiti Mahkluk Asing Dalam Kain Nik Aziz.

in Rencana by
entiti
Gambar ini telah diambil oleh seorang penyokong totok Pas dan beliau terkejut ada sesuatu yang menyerupai binatang keluar dari dalam kain Nik Aziz.
Sebelum itu beliau memohon maaf diatas penyiaran gambar ini dan ianya bukan untuk tujuan fitnah atau untuk memalukan Nik Aziz Nik Mat melainkan sekadar berkongsi mungkin sesuatu yang pelik.
Difahamkan gambar kelihatan Nik Aziz sedang menyelak atau terselak kain ini diambik masa beliau menghadiri satu majlis, mungkin beliau terlupa atau sebagainya Wallahuaalam persoalannya, cuba anda perhatikan apa yang ada dalam kain Nik Aziz itu, ternampak seolah-olah satu benda hidup seperti berkepala, ada mata, ada tangan.
Penyokong Pas totok yang mengambil gambar hanya mahu berkongsi sesuatu yang pelik supaya rakyat boleh buat andaian sendiri – Sungai Rapat Online
Pisau kata ” apa yang dia bela tu? Tok wali selipar bela kancil dalam kain ker? Si tua kutuk ni kalau syaitan dalam kain dia pun apa nak heran..semua tu sahabat dia bukan?”

Yuktes Vijay: The real story behind Sodomy 2 – Part 2

in Rencana by

8561684230_c4e4fd3a60

This article is in response to the claims of Dato Omar Abu Bakar in a video that was shared by Anwar Ibrahim on Facebook.

Why Anwar was in the apartment?

Anwar at various times claimed that he was in the apartment to meet some economists. However, none of these claims was ever substantiated. Not even one of the economist were brought to court to verify their presence with Anwar in court.

The truth is the defence council did interview 2 of the economists but they declined to take stand to support Anwar. Why? Were they really present there? Ask Anwar. This was indeed baffling as their evidence would have given Anwar a chance to prove to the general public that it was INDEED A BN CONSPIRACY.

Anwar claims he was set up but the question is what was he doing in the apartment? Typical Anwar. He puts the blame on one and all but fails to provide the sufficient and relevant evidence to come clean when he has the chance to do so.

Remember China Doll-Omega saga? If only he had shown his Omega watch or denied having one, he would not have the need to flash his tummy in every ceramah or press conferences to prove his innocence. Well, the truth is at that point of time, he did have a tummy which was carefully concealed by a bullet vest which made him look not having a tummy. How I know this? I should thank Anwar for the wonderful tea he served in his house on March 21 2011. What happened on this day? Google it up!

The landlord of the apartment

The landlord, his wife and 2 maids were brought as defence witness’ for interview in KL High Court. Even he declined to be a witness. Imagine this. I have a friend. He gives me his house to have interviews, talks and even negotiations with people but hesitates to take the stand for you. I overheard a lot of disturbing things during this course of interview. For the record, the interview with the landlord was the longest and yet he did not take the stand.

What was spoken here and discussed here? I am privy to the information but I am declining to reveal much for now as I fear for my safety. Not wanting to sound dramatic but I do know the amount of harassing calls I am getting every single day.

All information that I know with regards to the issues that I have highlighted here will be out in my final part. Part 3. I promise to release it on nomination day. Part 3 will include the real story of why the house owner hesitated, alibi list, Anwar’s flip-flop game with the defence counsels, and PM Najib’s name was brought in to smear his credibility.

Cukuplah Anwar. Stop lying. Please.

Yuktes Vijay

Calon Payung Terjun Rosakkan Transformasi Najib.

in Rencana by

Transformasi wakil rakyat dan pemilihan calon yang dibuat oleh Ds Najib cukup besar dan membawa perubahan yang drastik,banyak muka lama bakal ditukar kepada muka muka baru. Ds Najib tidak mahu kesilapan yang dibuat oleh pentadbiran yang lalu.

Octogenarian Parachutists

Sejak pembubaran Parlimen baru baru ini banyak pihak yang resah terutamanya yang nak jadi calon,Pisau lihat walaupun penyandang atau individu yang bersungguh sungguh membuat kerja di kawasan masing masing namun masih tidak menjanjikan samaada mereka ini boleh dicalonkan semula.

Ada yang tidor tak lena,mandi tak basah,demam tak kebah,makan 3 pinggan pun tak kenyang. Semua ini gara gara calon payung terjun. Sekarang ini sudah nampak muka muka baru yang bukan winable sebaliknya mengunakan cable.

Saat ini lobi melobi hingga ada yang sanggup ikut kemana saja Ds Najib pergi semata mata nak tunjuk muka. Pisau tertarik dengan pendedahan GAP apabila wujud calon menggunakan cable,jalan pintas yang cuba dibuat oleh calon calon ini sebenarnya menolak aspirasi perubahan yang cuba dibuat oleh Ds Najib.

Apatah lagi calon payung terjun diketahui punyai masaalah dan pasti bakal membuatkan jentera parti susah untuk berkempen.Perkembangan yang tidak sihat ini berlaku diseluruh negara,dari Perlis hinggalah ke Sabah. Di Pulau Pinang memang wujud dimana muka muka baru bakal tersenarai di DUN dan Parlimen,tetapi senarionya agak berbeza dari Perak apabila anak tempatan Pulau Pinang yang dikenali ramai yang mempunyai rekod yang bersih sudah pasti mengundang masaalah kepada pihak lawan.Ini menjadi resepi terpenting untuk mendapat sokongan daripada rakyat.

Di Perak pula calon payong terjun yang dibawa oleh Menteri Kewangan 2 Datuk Husni kelihatan membawa pakej,bukan saja orang luar malah disertakan puluhan masaalah peribadi dibelakang mereka.Mangkuk tingkat memang tidak diperlukan apatah lagi dalam mangkuk tingkat turut membawa lauk basi yang pasti bakal membuat pengundi sakit perut.

Pisau cukup yakin Ds Najib sudah pun mempunyai calon pilihan sendiri dan mereka ini sudah pun melepasi tapisan yang cukup ketat berbanding calon yang mengunakan cable.

Jangan cuba rosakan transformasi yang dibuat Ds Najib demi kepentingan peribadi. Dahulukan kepentingan dan kehendak rakyat berbanding individu individu yang tak sedar diri yang menjadi punca kerosakan BN.

Pisau kata ” pilih calon winable bukan calon yang guna cable”

Election promises: Who copied whom?

in Rencana by

IMG_3767.storyimage

In an email to the Editor, Wong Saikim wrote:

 

“Have you heard this story before?  At the launch of a new book, a visitor jumped up and down, screaming: “This is plagiarism. I have read every word in this book before.” When he was asked ‘Where?, he replied with a chuckle: “In the dictionary”.

 

 

I was reminded of this joke when I read in the newspapers about Pakatan Rakyat’s allegation that Barisan Nasional had ‘plagiarised’ its manifesto. PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar claimed that parts of the Barisan manifesto were ‘lifted’ from the Pakatan manifesto.

 

I have read the Barisan manifesto and I have re-read the Pakatan manifesto. I find instead that the reverse is true. Every policy in the Pakatan manifesto is a rehash of Alliance/Barisan policies which have been in existence since Malayan/Malaysian independence.

 

No, this is not an exaggeration. All of its overarching policy statements, ranging from eliminating discrimination to promoting culture to better education to job opportunities, have been the guiding principles of the ruling party these past 55 years.

 

There is not a single policy guideline that is new in the Pakatan document. As a specific policy, Nurul singled out the ‘reduction of car prices’ as her example of BN piracy. Let’s look at this claim closely.

 

The BN Government had introduced the National Automotive Policy way back in 2006 with the following as one of its aims: “To safeguard the interests of consumers in terms of value for money, safety and quality of products and services”.

 

Inherent in this clause is the promise to not only review car prices but more importantly, to look into the whole question of making the total cost of transportation more affordable for all Malaysians.

 

If reducing the price of cars is to make them more affordable, one must remember that the national car project was launched almost 30 years ago, making car ownership affordable to a larger section of the Malaysian population than before.

 

Pakatan proposes to ‘restructure the automotive policy’. The Automotive Policy is a dynamic instrument which has already been restructured over the last seven years. So, who is copying whom?

 

Another Pakatan proposal; to abolish tolls, is also not new.  The BN government had in the past abolished tolls in selected areas and will continue to review toll collection on the expiry of toll concession periods.

 

The Pakatan manifesto does not promise to abolish tolls immediately.  Its stated policy is to ‘gradually’ abolish tolls. The word ‘gradually’ is not defined, and it could take 10, 15 or 20 years.

 

It must also be remembered that collecting tolls is not anathema to Pakatan.  In Penang, the State Government is proposing toll collection in its proposed undersea tunnel project.  

Again, who is copying from whom?

 

Yet another Pakatan proposal is to abolish monopolies.  But isn’t this the same purpose for which the Competition Act 2010 was introduced by the ruling government? So again, who is copying from whom?

 

Other copycat policies of Pakatan include the following: 

 

•  Building affordable houses for all.

•  Basic health access

•  Social safety network

•  One million new jobs

•  Minimum wage

 

These issues have always been the cornerstone of BN government’s policy thrusts.

 

SO, ONCE AGAIN, WHO IS COPYING WHOM?

 

Source: MOLE

Dr Sidek : Pendedahan Bekas Pegawai Agama Anwar Mengejutkan

in Rencana by

Prof. Datuk Dr. Sidek Baba berkata beliau agak terkejut dengan pendedahan seorang mufti yang pernah menjadi pegawai agama Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang turut hadir dalam pertemuan tertutup di rumahnya kira-kira pertengahan tahun lalu.

“Di antaranya yang saya tanya adalah seorang mufti, yang pernah menjadi penasihat agama Datuk Seri Anwar. Beliau datang ke rumah saya dalam pertemuan tertutup rakan-rakan saya dalam ABIM dan simpatisme ABIM.

“Siapa Anwar sebenarnya..saya agak terkejut. Jadi, saya tidak kutip pandangan-pandangan daripada orang biasa berkenaan Datuk Seri Anwar. Beliau penasihat agama Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.”

Beliau tidak menyatakan siapakah mufti yang juga bekas penasihat agama Anwar itu serta butiran pendedahan yang didedahkan kepadanya, namun difahamkan kejadian tersebut berlaku ketika Anwar menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan.

Dr Sidek yang bekas Setiausaha Agung ABIM turut mendedahkan maklumat bekas orang kanan Anwar, Senator Ezam Mohd Nor yang bercerita tentang kejadian Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail yang pernah menelefonnya dari Washington agar tidak membenarkan mana-mana lelaki bermalam di rumah kediamanya bersama Anwar.

Difahamkan kejadian itu berlaku sekitar tahun 2005 dan menjadi punca utama Ezam meletakkan jawatan dalam PKR dan menjauhkan diri daripada Anwar.

“Saya berjumpa anak murid saya, saudara Ezam Mohd Nor. Dia belajar di UIAM dulu, saya sebagai Timbalan Rektor masa itu.

“Saya tanya dia, Ezam tolong cerita dengan cikgu, mengapa kamu tinggalkan Anwar ?

“Ezam ceritakan..bahawa suatu malam, sewaktu Anwar balik, di mana Dr Wan Azizah telefon daripada Washington (bertanya) dengan siapa bersama Anwar masa itu.

“Wan Azizah berasa resah..sehingga sekarang Wan Azizah tidak nafikan. Sehingga sekarang Anwar tidak nafikan benda itu berlaku. Kalau dia tidak nafikan, apakah benda itu berlaku atau macam mana ?

“Bagi saya seorang ahli akademik, sudah tentu, saya nak tahu, mengapa tidak dinafi ?,” katanya kepada Buletin Utama, TV3 hari ini selepas mengunjungi bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, di pejabatnya Yayasan Al Bukhary, Kuala Lumpur.

Menyentuh tentang ramai tokoh-tokoh ABIM yang bertanding atas tiket PKR dalam Pilihan Raya Umum ke-13, Dr Sidek berkata, ABIM kini sudah tidak boleh mendakwa sebagai badan ‘bebas’ lagi dan dalam jangka panjang, ia akan merosakkan imej NGO itu sebagai sebuah badan dakwah.

“Kali ini dikatakan ramai pimpinan ABIM akan terlibat dalam politik. Sedangkan ABIM adalah sebuah pertubuhan yang saya anggotai lebih 30 tahun, sejak dulu, sehingga Anwar menjadi menteri dalam kabinet kerajaan, ABIM mengambil sikap non-partisan.

“Ini penting bagi ABIM, kerana ABIM sebuah badan dakwah dan tarbiah. Kalau ABIM mula memihak kepada tokoh-tokoh politik tertentu, bayangkan perjuangan selama ini dan jangka panjang ABIM.”

Pada 27 Mac lalu, Dr Sidek mendedahkan tiga sebab beliau meninggalkan Anwar, meskipun lebih 30 tahun mereka bersahabat.

Katanya, sebelum meninggalkan Anwar beliau menyiasat serta menemu bual 28 individu yang sangat rapat dengan Anwar dan kemudian membuat solat sunat istikharah bagi memohon petunjuk.

“Anwar ketika kami bersama-sama dalam ABIM dulu sentiasa mengingatkan saya bahawa seseorang pemimpin bukan sahaja kena bersih tetapi mesti kelihatan bersih dan saya pegang erat amanat itu sampai sekarang.

“Namun, dalam siasatan selama tiga tahun sebelum meninggalkan beliau, saya dapati terlalu banyak persoalan moral yang melingkari Anwar. Saya pegang kata-kata saya ini kerana kesemua 28 saksi itu masih hidup.” – AIDC20130403-060814.jpg

Kisah Burung Yang Nakal.

in Rencana by

Kenapa agaknya haprak pakatan pilih burung?

Adakah burung burung ini mempunyai kaitan yang rapat dengan perangai pemimpin pakatan ?

Burung burung pakatan ini semua orang tahu tak kenal halal haram..

Jika nak dikaitkan dengan permasaalahan burung burung liar pakatan memang banyak diperkatakan di blog blog..

Ada burung yang hentam bini orang atas keretapi,ada burung yang ditugaskan beri kaunseling bersama isteri orang, ada burung yang hentam pelangi,ada burung yang dihentam dalam toilet,ada burung yang hentam china doll , tapi yang paling ganas ada burung yang hentam burung lain..

Pisau rasakan memang benarlah mereka menyemai kasih sayang tanpa perlu mengambil perkiraan agama halal atau haram, yang penting burung burung ini kehendaknya dipenuhi dan dipuaskan.

Binatang liar pakatan ini datangnya dari 3 parti yang menjaja atas nama “RAKYAT. Adakah rakyat Malaysia sebuas burung burung ini atau burung burung ini hanya mempermainkan moral rakyat sama seperti mereka.

20130404-163554.jpg

Pisau kata ” ada juga burung suka main pedang yer”


Hit Counter provided by Curio cabinets
Pergi ke Atas