Media luar dan media tempatan proksi yahudi bakal berdepan tindakan saman fitnah. Pisau berharap serangan yang menggila oleh puak haprak ini dapat dihentikan dan dikenakan dengan tindakan yang tegas.
Pisau lihat negara kita tenggelam dengan black propaganda at highest level. Sambil makan popcorn dan menjadi penonton Pisau hanya mampu tengok gelagat orang Umno yang berebut rebut nak tarik Najib turun dalam masa beliau sedang diserang.
Masa sekarang ni la pelbagai spekulasi timbul.. orang tu bakal naik..orang tu bakal turun.. MT Umno bersidang lah bagai… habis pakat kelupuq semua apa hal ni.. Mana perginya panglima panglima Umno? Presiden diserang.. kena fitnah pulak tu.. malangnya di luar sana bukan nak membantu tolong jawap sebaliknya membantu sebarkan fitnah.. ditambah dengan kesibukan program berbuka puasa saban hari..
Sedarlah pembohongan dan fitnah peringat tertinggi ni jika dilihat dah serupa kita menonton filem “Wag The Dog” . Sebenarnya mudah benar nak menipu penyokong kerajaan dan rakyat… keluarkan berita dengan dokumen palsu..kemudian kita dapat tengok bagaimana reaksi mereka..
Najib dah jawap..tunggu siasatan PAC dan AUDIT.. tapi depa lebih percaya media kong kali kong tajaan yahudi..
Najib dah jawab dan nafi dia tak makan pun duit 1MDB.. tapi puak penipu tu keluarkan keratan dokumen yang diubahsuai kemudian letak bagi nampak real sikit ..sekali lagi habis rakyat semua kena tipu..
Ingatlah kita diserang oleh puak yang sama menipu pasal 40 ribu bangla.. puak yang sama juga menipu pasal Altantuya.. puak yang sama juga menipu kononnya Anwar di suntik dengan racun Arsenik..
Takkan semudah tu rakyat boleh ditipu..
Berikut adalah kenyataan dari peguam Datuk Seri Najib Razak
A Wall street Journal had published an article dated 3rd July 2015, implicating our client Datuk Seri Najib. Immediately, our client had instructed us, Messrs Hafarizam Wan & Aisha Mubarak, to scrutinize the said article. The article is tainted with numerous allegations against our client which involved several companies and transactions.
Combing through the said article, we have concluded that the language is intentionally or otherwise has made reference to several facts and companies which are vaguely described. Reference is made to the said article wherein it has been stated that our client had been directly probed into 1MDB, however contents of the article refers to indirect transactions where our client has been implicated with 1MDB-linked companies. A clear contradiction which requires further clarification.
This article by WSJ was issued, published and circulated through WSJ web portal www.wsj.com . Firstly, we have been instructed to identify the parties involved in the authorship, distribution and publishing, for the purpose of naming the appropriate parties in any potential actions which requires deliberation and research as the article does not reflect extensive details for service of any legal letter or court documents.
Secondly, another issue of concern is, jurisdictional issues of which the publication originates from United States of America and accessible worldwide. We have been also instructed that a local presence of WSJ is also available and we are pursuing further clarification and details on this matter.
Since the article involves several parties, we have also been instructed to consider a joint action or an action against, in the event evidence shows a conspiracy against our client. Kindly note that the companies named as conspirators with our client, in the article are; International Petroleum Investment Co, Tanore Finance Corp, SRC International Sdn. Bhd, and Ihsan Perdana Sdn. Bhd.
Several names of companies or organizations had only been referred to as the related companies or companies belonging to certain organizations or companies, and also the sources or destinations or the alleged transactions has not been disclosed. This in itself either intentionally or otherwise has caused further identification of facts been required.
Once we have identified the parties, the jurisdiction, and the involvement of conspirators or are they merely parties which also had been innocently imputed in the article, we can then proceed to address the third issue.
The third issue is to tackle all possible or plausible legal remedies of which our client shall be given advise on an action of defamation, further tortuous actions and remedies including any statutory violations by WSJ and related companies and (if any) conspirers.
This is not a straightforward legal action due to the national and international imputations. We have been instructed to identify facts and lay full facts, before our client, is able to proceed with further instructions.
The purpose of clear explanation is to avoid unnecessary objections by WSJ on the imputations that are made. Once our client has obtained all necessary facts and the position of WSJ is ascertained, we have strict instructions to immediately exhaust legal avenues and remedies.
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MESSRS HAFARIZAM WAN & AISHA MUBARAK
WAN AZMIR BIN WAN MAJID
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC
ARTICLES WRITTEN BY SIMON CLARK AND TOM WRIGHT IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL CONCERNING YAB DATO’ SRI MOHD NAJIB BIN TUN HAJI ABDUL RAZAK ENTITLED “MALAYSIA LEADER’S ACCOUNTS PROBED” PUBLISHED ON 2ND JULY 2015 AND “SCANDAL IN MALAYSIA” PUBLISHED ON 6TH JULY 2015 (“ THE ARTICLES”)
We act for the Right Honourable Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak, the Prime Minister of Malaysia, in his personal capacity.
We refer to the Articles dated 2nd July 2015 and 6th July 2015 in your Wall Street Journal which, we state, contains a plethora of convoluted, scurrilous and vague allegations against our client.
In the circumstances, we are instructed by our Client to seek confirmation as to whether it is your position as taken in the Articles that our Client misappropriated nearly USD 700 million from 1Malaysia Development Berhad?
We are instructed to procure your position because the Articles collectively suggest that you are unsure of “the original source of the money and what happened to the money” whilst on the other hand, the general gist of the Articles create a clear impression that our Client has misappropriated about USD 700 million belonging to 1Malaysia Development Berhad.
In the circumstance and in the interests of our Client, we would expect a Newspaper of your international standing and reputation to state unequivocally and with clarity as to whether it is your contention that our Client misappropriated about USD 700 million belonging to 1Malaysia Development Berhad. You will no doubt appreciate the seriousness of the allegations made against our Client in the said Articles and this confirmation is sought to enable us to advise our Client on the appropriate legal recourse he can take to seek redress in relation to the publication of these Articles.
We demand a reply within fourteen (14) days of the date hereof and please let us know whether you have appointed solicitors in Malaysia to accept service of legal proceedings on your behalf and on behalf of the reporters who wrote the Articles in the event that legal proceeding become necessary.
We hereby reserve all our Client’s rights in this matter.
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MESSRS HAFARIZAM WAN & AISHA MUBARAK
Pisau kata ” Layan Popcorn dengan coke..tengok gelagat puak cakap pandai..”