Berita telus dan seimbang..

Monthly archive

July 2016

LIM GUAN ENG DALAM DILEMA

in DAP by

Pilhanraya mengejut yang mahu diadakan bukan untuk mengukur sokongan rakyat pada Pakatan Harapan bila Guan Eng ditangkap kerana kesalahan rasuah banglo pada 29 Jun 2016 tetapi adalah untuk *MENUKAR KETUA MENTERI BARU* mengikut pilihan Lim Guan Eng.

Lim Guan Eng sudah tahu bahawa beliau pasti akan disumbat kepenjara sebelum PRU 14 akan datang atas skandal rasuah. Tapi yang amat merunsingkan Lim Guan Eng adalah Siapa yg boleh jadi *BONEKA* bagi pihak beliau sementara beliau menjalani hukuman di penjara.

Lim Guan Eng tidak mahu lepaskan jawatan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang kepada Timbalan Ketua Menteri 1 dari PKR kerana Beliau berbangsa melayu. 

Lim Guan Eng juga tidak mahu melepas jawatan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang kepada Timbalan Ketua Menteri 2 kerana berbangsa India dan tidak disukai majoriti Adun dan Pemimpin DAP di Pulau Pinang.

Bagi mengekalkan legasinya maka Lim Guan Eng terpaksa bubarkan DUN Pulau Pinang dan mencari seorang *BONEKA* dari kroninya untuk menggantikan tempatnya. 
Siapakah *BONEKA* itu? Semua orang tahu Lim Guan Eng tidak disukai majoriti pemimpin DAP Pulau Pinang.

Persoalan yang bermain difikiran saya, berapa orangkah kroni Lim Guan Eng yang akan diimport masuk untuk jadi calon DAP dan siapakah adun yang akan disingkirkan untuk beri laluan kepada dinasti Lim terus mengekalkan kuasa Dinasti Lim di Pulau Pinang?
sumber:Ahli Dap

Pabila Pah Koya Sound Tony Telanjang, Bukti DAP Dah Terlondeh Habis !

in Pakatan Rakyat by


Di tinggalkan telanjang bulat mungkin bermaksud dahulunya DAP sama sama mempertahankan Anwar ketika beliau melancarkan torpedo ke tanah tiga segi China Doll..

Apabila Lim Guan Eng kantoi dengan rasuah , DAP berasakan tokong mereka bagaikan sudah tiada nilai dan langsung tidak dipertahankan oleh PKR.

Soal bogel telanjang bulat nih memang cukup sinonim dengan haprak pakatan sebab itulah mereka main ayat bogel togel telanjang bagai .. tak perlu lah Pisau ulang sebab semua orang dah tau betapa gelojohnya puak ni..

Komen dari rakan Pas cukup menarik.. 

Kalau DAP boleh kutip derma 1 juta lebih dalam masa 1 hari untuk LGE, saya yakin DAP boleh kutip RM64 juta dalam masa 2 bulan untuk tampung kos PRN di P.Pinang. Kamu yang nak PRN, kenapa duit pembayar cukai yang perlu dileburkan hanya kerana isu banglow tanpa swimming pool? 
Akhirnya Rakyat dan Pembayar Cukai yang jadi mangsa. Anggaran kos PRN sebanyak RM64 Juta bukanlah jumlah yang sedikit. Hanya kerana isu sebuah banglo tanpa swimming pool?.

Pisau kata “pah koya pun ada taste.. takat Tony Pua telanjang dia tak heran.. sebab tu kena sound”

DAP Mahu Gunakan Pilihanraya Negeri Sebagai Mahkamah Rakyat Untuk Tutup Kerja Rasuah Lim Guan Eng!

in Berita Utama by

Lim Guan Eng bersungguh sungguh mendesak agar satu PRN diadakan kerana beliau sedar kerja rasuah dan penyelewengan beliau sudah tidak dapat ditutup lagi. Apatah lagi pihak SPRM dan pihak pendakwaraya sudah mendapat bukti bukti kukuh untuk mendakwa beliau.

 

Kita semua tahu,betapa Lim Guan Eng dan DAP amat licik malah mereka boleh berbohong tanpa berasa malu sedangkan orang ramai tahu mereka sedang berbohong.

 

Ini membuktikan kulit babi DAP memang cukup tebal disebabkan itulah mereka tidak mahu Lim Guan Eng dilihat sebagai seorang pesalah rasuah maka PRN digunakan sebagai mahkamah rakyat untuk menjustifikasi kononnya pendakwaan keatas rasuah Lim Guan Eng adalah satu pendakwaan politik.

 

Adakah Lim Guan Eng dan DAP mahu rakyat menerima kaedah mendapatkan banglo murah dan juga penyelewengan tanah Taman Manggis dibenarkan dan tidak menyalahi undang undang?DAP berasa amat yakin jika mengadakan kempen semasa PRN nanti Lim Guan Eng akan menjadikan pentas ceramah untuk berbohong dan menutup kesalahan rasuah beliau.

 

Buat DAP,PRN adalah mahkamah rakyat untuk mendapatkan referundum kononnya sebarang keputusan dari mahkamah majistret atau mahkamah tinggi adalah tidak sah!Penahanan Lim Guan Eng akan disebut sebagai tahanan politik bukan tahanan atas kesalahan rasuah !!

 

Pisau lihat rakan rakan pembangkang tahu Lim Guan Eng dan DAP didalam keadaan terdesak,diluar sana mana ada kita dengar Lim Guan Eng dipertahankan oleh pemimpin PKR dan PAN secara bermati matian..Ini menjadi bukti kes rasuah Lim Guan Eng adalah legit dan bukan direka reka.

Baca kenyataan Pengerusi Perhubungan Umno Negeri Pulau Pinang;-

Merujuk Kepada Kenyataan Media oleh YB Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail Presiden PKR pada 26 Julai 2016

” Seperti di duga PKR sekali lagi menyatakan mereka belum yakin dengan cadangan Lim Guan Eng dan DAP untuk mengadakan Pilihanraya Negeri Pulau Pinang lebih awal dan PAN  pula mengambil sikap ‘tunggu dan lihat’.

” Ini merupakan satu tamparan hebat kepada ego Lim Guan Eng dan DAP yang masih gagal mendapatkan sokongan rakan kongsi  utama mereka bagi mengadakan pilihanraya negeri lebih awal.

” Kegagalan Lim Guan Eng meyakinkan sekutu politiknya untuk menyokong cadangan beliau telah mencalar maruah dan kredibiliti beliau sebagai Setiausaha Agong DAP dan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang serta menghakis keyakinan dan hormat rakyat terhadap beliau sebagai seorang pemimpin utama pakatan parti pembangkang.

” Cadangan mengadakan Pilihanraya Negeri adalah satu langkah tergesa-gesa dan terburu-buru yang dibuat oleh Lim Guan Eng dan DAP dalam keadaan panik setelah beliau dihadapkan ke Mahkamah kerana dua pertuduhan jenayah rasuah.

” Bersandarkan keputusan Majlis Pimpinan Pusat PKR semalam, bermakna 10 ADUN PKR di DUN Pulau Pinang belum bersetuju dengan pembubaran segera DUN,PAS yang mempunyai seorang ADUN juga tidak bersetuju manakala 10 ADUN Barisan Nasional  tidak menyokong cadangan tersebut.

” Oleh itu kita boleh menganggap hanya 18 orang ADUN DAP sahaja yang menyokong cadangan tersebut setakat ini.

” Berdasarkan kiraan 21/40 orang ADUN tidak bersetuju dan hanya 19 orang lagi menyokong cadangan membubarkan DUN dan mengadakan Pilihanraya Negeri ; maka  boleh dirumuskan bahawa Lim Guan Eng sudah hilang kepercayaan majoriti Ahli-Ahli DUN Pulau Pinang dan sedang menghadapi krisis keyakinan dan kepercayaan terhadap dirinya sebagai Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang.

” Percubaan Lim Guan Eng untuk mengheret rakyat ke dalam masalah peribadi beliau, dengan cadangan membubarkan DUN bagi mengadakan Pilihanraya Negeri jelas telah ditolak. Berdasarkan perkembangan terkini ini beliau seharusnya mengambil tindakan bermaruah dan berintegriti melepaskan jawatan sebagai Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang dengan segera.

Terima kasih.

Selepas Untung Besar Dalam Rasuah Banglo Murah,Skandal Bina Terowong DAP Mahu Rakyat Lupakan Untuk Tumpu PRN..

in Berita Utama by

Selepas skandal banglo terlajak murah dan tanah taman manggis,bagaikan serba tidak kena apabila pembohongan mengenai skandal terowong yang merugikan kerajaan negeri cuba ditutup dengan mengaku kononnya kerajaan negeri mahu pula membina jambatan Pulau Pinang ke tiga.

Kerajaan negeri membayar lebih 300 juta kepada syarikat kroni  hanya untuk membuat kajian tanah.Kajian apa yang mereka buat hingga menelan lebih 300 juta sedangkan projek belum pun masih berjalan.

Menteri Kerjaraya mendedahkan betapa Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang seorang pembohong apabila hanya menghantar 2 keping surat permohonan untuk membina jambatan Pulau Pinang yang ketiga sedangkan dalam masa yang tidak membatalkan kontrak dengan syarikat kroni yang dikatakan akan membina terowong dasar laut.

Persoalannya,adakahnya Lim Guan Eng memperolehi keuntungan peribadi dalam projek membina terowong dasar laut? Mengapa kos membuat kertas kajian menelan lebih 300 juta ringgit? Siapa yang mendapat keuntungan hasil rompakan wang kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang?

Menganggap Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang tidak serius, Kementerian Kerja Raya telah mengantung rundingan berhubung permohonan untuk membina jambatan ketiga di negeri itu.

Menterinya, Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof berkata, kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang gagal menghantar dokuman-dokumen tersebut pada tarikh akhir 22 Julai lalu meskipun sudah empat peringatan diberikan.

“Saya tidak faham mengapa kerajaan Pulau Pinang gagal menghantar dokumen tersebut kerana mereka pernah menyatakan kajian-kajian terhadap kos sehingga RM305 juta telah pun siap atau 83 peratus siap sejak tiga bulan lalu.

“Dokumen-dokumen tersebut perlu digunakan untuk menyokong permohonan serta membantu kementerian untuk mempertimbangkan projek berkenaan.

“Kementerian kami memberi fokus pada manfaat rakyat. Tiada kerajaan tempatan di dalam dunia yang boleh memberi kelulusan secara prinsip terhadap sebuah projek prasarana bernilai billion ringgit dengan menghantar dua helai surat sebagaimana yang dihantar oleh kerajaan Pulau Pinang kepada kami,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan semalam.

Tambah Fadillah, beliau tidak pasti sama ada itu adalah amalan standard di Pulau Pinang atau tidak bagaimanapun perkara tersebut tidak diamalkan di peringkat kementerian Kerajaan Persekutuan.

Dengan itu, Kementerian Kerja Raya, katanya, meletakkan permohonan tersebut sebagai Keep-In-View (KIV)

Pisau kata ” Dia nak buat PRN,untuk buktikan rasuah beli banglo disokong pengundi DAP”

US DOJ says “YES” but 1MDB says “NO”. Why?

in Berita Utama by
The USA’s Department of Justice (DOJ) had alleged that billions were stolen from 1MDB and initiated asset seizures to recover this but 1MDB insist that it had not lost any money and that all its assets are accounted for.
Essentially, the DOJ says someone stole your money and I will get some of it back for you while 1MDB is saying “No. That one is not my money”.
Why is this peculiar situation happening?
Let’s follow the money trail – particular the 3 sources of funds that the DOJ explicitly said the alleged stolen money came from.

Alleged source of funds 1: Good Star, as part of the PetroSaudi-1MDB Joint Venture.

 

 

What did 1MDB pay:

 

USD1.83 billion of which USD1.03 billion was transferred to Good Star and USD800 million to PetroSaudi. The ownership and the responsibility of the funds in question had changed when 1MDB paid the money as per the agreements
 

What happened to the money:

 

JV was converted to a loan. Loan was repaid by PetroSaudi to 1MDB via USD2.32 billion worth of investment units (Principle + interest/dividends).
 

What happened to the investment units?

 

USD1.4 billion was redeemed and used for 1MDB working capital purposes with remaining USD940 million in investment units.

When the Govt Auditor General special Audit report on 1MDB was leaked and published by Sarawak Report, this document also surfaced. It is a 3rd party document between Abu Dhabi and Bridge Capital – meaning it is not under Official Secrets Act (OSA). You can view the full 4 pages here.

This is the Deed of Capital Guarantee where Aabar Investments PJS of the Abu Dhabi explicitly guarantees all the value of the fund units of the Cayman funds run by Bridge Capital.

 

This guarantee is not by the disputed Aabar in the British Virgin Island but the actual sovereign fund itself owned by IPIC and the Abu Dhabi Govt.

This proves that the USD2.33 billion of payment returned to 1MDB based on 1MDB’s total investment of USD1.8 billion in PetroSaudi by Good Star and PetroSaudi is real and has real value.

This also means that it is simply not legally possible for any of 1MDB money to be “stolen” by Good Star/PetroSaudi as 1MDB got back all their money plus a decent profit from the PetroSaudi JV.

This is a significant document and I am surprised that the US DOJ did not highlight this document or perhaps they are not aware of this document during their investigation since they did not bother to meet up with the Abu Dhabi or Malaysian Govt when they did their investigations.

If this document is genuine that means that 1MDB’s chances in the arbritration with IPIC is much stronger.

What happened to the remaining USD940 million in investment units?

 

The entire USD2.33 billion units including the remaining USD940 million units is guaranteed by the disputed Aabar Investments PJS ofin Abu Dhabi (not the disputed one in British Virgin Island (BVI)) and was earmarked for the asset-debt swap arrangement between 1MDB and IPIC which is now in arbitration.

The bottom line:

 

1MDB cannot say or claim that Good Star or PetroSaudi funds is their money.

What happens next? :

 

Nothing.
As far as 1MDB is concerned, PetroSaudi has paid back all of 1MDB’s investment  plus USD481 million of profits and dividends. There is no money to recover from either Good Star or PetroSaudi.
An interesting nugget here is that if Jho Low and Riza have been named and accused of wrong-doing here for receiving funds from Good Star then it is surprising why both the then Riyadh Governor Prince Turki, who is the 7th son of the then King Abdullah and fellow PetroSaudi founder Tarek Obaid are not similarly reprimanded even though the FBI also stated they received money from Good Star.

Alleged source of funds 2: The disputed Aabar-BVI as part of the Abu Dhabi-1MDB joint-venture

 

What did 1MDB pay?

 

USD3.51 billion to Aabar-BVI for collateral, joint investment ventures and options termination agreements. Additionally, there is a USD940 million guarantee of the Cayman investment units and guarantee for the USD1.5 billion GIL fund units recommended by the Swiss-based BSI bank.

What happened to the guaranteed assets and money given by 1MDB.

 

The entire USD6 billion of payments and guarantees was identified as assets for the 1MDB-IPIC asset swap agreement in exchange with IPIC based on the following:
Assets from 1MDB:
  • USD 3.5 billion cash deposits paid to Aabar BVI.
  • USD 1.5 billion GIL funds (Fund Manager introduced by BSI and guaranteed by Aabar BVI)
  • USD 940 million Brazen Sky fund units (Guaranteed by Aabar Investments ABU DHABI – not the disputed Aabar BVI – this is in the AG report and the PAC report)
Assets from IPIC:
  • Assume 1MDB’s USD 3.5 billion bond principal
  • Assume 1MDB’s USD 1.5 billion future bond interest
  • USD 1 billion in cash (paid to 1MDB in June 2015)
IPIC is now disputing that Aabar-BVI is their company and has cancelled the Asset swap agreement but 1MDB insist that the Aabar-BVI is an IPIC company. Therefore, it is now in dispute.
The case is now in the London Court of International Arbitration where initial proceedings had started last month.

Why did 1MDB even transfer or deal with Aabar-BVI in the first place when according to IPIC and Aabar Abu Dhabi, it is not owned by them?

When 1MDB signed the Joint-Venture agreement with Aabar Investments PJS in Abu Dhabi. The discussions was with Aabar’s duly-authorized Chairman, Khadem Abdullah al-Qubaisi and their Managing Director Mohamed Badawy Al-Husseiny – both of whom are also indicted by the FBI together with Jho Low.
During the agreement signing, 1MDB also engaged their internal and external lawyers to certify that Aabar Investments PJS Ltd in the BVI is owned by the Aabar Investments PJS in Abu Dhabi.
The attached document which came from here, is the Certificate of Incumbency issued by the incorporation of the disputed Aabar in BVI. This certificate is issued by Hong Kong based Offshore Incorporations Limited (OIL)- he leader in international incorporations and corporate services.
The Certificate of Incumbency states the two directors of Aabar Investments PJS Ltd in the BVI to be the Chairman and Managing Director of Aabar Investments PJS and the sole shareholder to be the Abu Dhabi based Aabar Investments PJS.
Headquartered in Hong Kong, OIL has offices in the BVI, Singapore, Taiwan, Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, UK, Cyprus and Dubai and has around 220 employees.
OIL is a group company of Vistra Group, which has 2,300 employees in 40 jurisdictions; its global headquarters are in Hong Kong.
If the official incorporation documents, the Chairman of the parent company, the Managing Director of the parent company and both the internal and external lawyers engaged in the joint-venture due diligence tells 1MDB that Aabar Investments PJS Ltd in the BVI is legitimately owned by Aabar Investments PJS in Abu Dhabi, then what else could 1MDB have done differently to certify that this is not a fake company?
The ownership of Aabar-BVI and the associated transfers were also verified through successive audits by external auditors KPMG and Deloitte’s over the next few years and no alarms were raised then. Both auditors would have certainly met or contacted Aabar in Abu Dhabi to verify the transactions too.
However, for reasons still unknown, IPIC agreed to the swap deal, paid USD1 billion, paid the interests on the USD3.5 billion bonds,and then only said in April 2016 – an amazing 10 months after the swap deal was signed and years after 1MDB had stated they had paid all those money to Aabar in publicly available financial statements.

But whatever the case, when 1MDB paid those money to Aabar-BVI or Aabar PJS in Abu Dhabi, the ownership and responsibility of the money has transferred to Aabar.

The bottom line:

1MDB cannot say or claim that the money that was transferred from Aabar BVI to Jho Low, Red Granite, Khadem et al as alleged by the US DOJ is theirs. As far as 1MDB is concerned, Aabar BVI is legitimate and owned by IPIC. If money from here was stolen then it was stolen from IPIC and not 1MDB.
For 1MDB to claim that the money is theirs would mean that the entire London arbitration case between IPIC and 1MDB will collapse and 1MDB will end up losing billions while Abu Dhabi’s IPIC will get away blameless – despite both of IPIC’s most senior executives, their former Managing Director Khadem from 2007 to 2015 and Aabar PJS’s Managing Director Mohamed Badawy Al-Husseiny being named as part of the DOJ case and asset seizures.

What happens next? :

1MDB will need to focus on winning their arbitration case by proving that the two senior executives of Aabar and IPIC had acted with full authority of the board and that all checks had shown that Aabar-BVI had legally belonged to Aaabar Investments PJS Abu Dhabi and IPIC.
1MDB believes it has enough evidence and a strong case in winning this case since it deliberately refused to pay for the scheduled interest payments on the bonds despite having RM3 billion in the bank then and allowed the two 1MDB bonds guaranteed by IPIC to default thus triggering the guarantee by IPIC, which forced IPIC to pay up.
If 1MDB wins this case then USD4.5 billion in assets can be recovered from IPIC. If this is the case, it is likely that IPIC will take-over the USD3.5b bonds and allow 1MDB to keep the USD1 billion which they had paid earlier. IPIC will then be the party responsible for reclaiming the USD4.5 assets in Aabar-BVI.

Alleged source of funds 3: The USD1.5 billion invested by 1MDB in BSI Bank investment funds.

 

What did 1MDB pay?

 

USD1.5 billion invested in registered investment funds recommended by the Swiss-based BSI Bank. This USD1.5 billion was part of the proceeds of the 2013 USD3 billion bond (also known as the 1MDB GIL money) that was raised as part of the proposed joint-venture with Aabar to develop Bandar Malaysia in the year 2013. The remaining USD1.5 billion was used by 1MDB as part of their working capital towards development of TRX, Bandar Malaysia and the power plants business.

Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, General Sheikh Mohammed Zayed Al Nahyan, witnessed the signing ceremony in 2013.

The proposed Bandar Malaysia JV signed in March 2013 was planned to be an arrangement where 1MDB would raise USD3 billion and Aabar would raise USD3 billion and both parties would contribute to the 1MDB-GIL company to develop Bandar Malaysia.
As Aabar failed to raise their USD3 billion in time and the JV eventually did not take off, 1MDB then decided to use half of their money as working capital while investing the unused portion in an investment fund to avoid negative carry (or paying interest on unused funds raised from a loan).

What happened to the money in the investment funds?

 

The money is still invested in the funds and was originally also planned to be used as part of the asset swap with IPIC since it is guaranteed by Aabar-BVI.

What happens next? :

Since the asset swap is now in termination, this fund is already in the redemption phase. However, redeeming a unit of USD1.5 billion is not like withdrawing money from a bank. The fund itself would have to sell their investments before paying 1MDB. It is believed that this process is close to completion.

How much of actual “Wang Rakyat” was used by 1MDB so far?

The paid-up capital is RM1 million paid for by the Malaysian Govt. The rest of the funding that went up to RM42 billion at one time was raised from bonds and bank borrowings.

How much in loans does 1MDB still have?

 

Other than 3 bonds, all the remaining borrowings, lines of credit and other bonds have been paid off by 1MDB during the debt rationalization exercise started in the year 2015.

Since the beginning of 2015, 1MDB has cleared and removed all the following loans from its book:

  • fully paid RM3.5 billion Powertek loan from a consortium of banks
  • fully paid RM1 billion standby credit from the govt
  • fully paid USD150m EXIM bank loan
  • RM2.4 billion Bandar Malaysia sukuk taken over by 60% buyer of 1MDB.
  • transferred RM800 million Socso loan into project financing for TRX. This loan is self-amortizing and is already significantly repaid.
  • removed RM6 billion of legacy power debts previously assumed, as part of the Edra sale
  • fully paid RM2 billion Marstan loan arranged by Ananda Krishnan which was used to repay the RM2 billion Maybank bridging loan
  • fully paid USD975m Deutsche Bank loan
After all these other loans had been paid of, 1MDB is still left with RM2.3 billion in cash but has the following renaming bonds.
  1. RM5 billion 2009 long-term bonds that matures in the year 2039- these bonds are tied to the continued development of TRX and is matched to the cashflows of this development.
  2. USD3.5 billion 2012 bonds guaranteed by IPIC that matures in the year 2022. (if 1MDB wins the arbitration then these bonds will likely be taken up by IPIC)
  3.  USD3 billion 2013 bonds that matures in the year 2023. – these bonds are tied to the continued development of Bandar Malaysia, which 1MDB still owns 40% of, and is matched to the cashflows of this development.

How much of actual “Wang Rakyat” has actually been lost so far due to the DOJ civil suit?

None so far. Since the amounts alleged “stolen” are from the loans that 1MDB took above and the loans are not due, no actual Malaysian money has been lost as yet. This is assuming that the IPIC dispute can be settled in 1MDB’s favour and the USD1.5 billion GIL bonds is redeemed.
It is also important to note that other than the USD3.5 billion bonds which are in dispute with IPIC, 1MDB have not defaulted on any loans or bonds. In fact as pointed out above, many loans have been completely repaid or settled.

The final bottom line.

It must be noted that all 3 sources of funds which the DOJ report listed were all direct dealings with the governments and royal families of two different Arab countries and 1MDB paid directly to accounts instructed by them. If 1MDB was to be scammed, then these countries would have helped to scam 1MDB.

Or if 1MDB itself was a scam then those countries pakat with 1MDB to help scam.
But the real bottom line is this:
If 1MDB manages to win the IPIC arbitration and also redeem the USD1.5 billion GILfunds then 1MDB can truly say that none of their money was missing or stolen.
This means that it is impossible for  Jho Low, Riza, Khadem, Malaysia Official 1 (ie PM) or anyone else for that matter to have stolen any money from 1MDB to buy or invest all those assets that the FBI now wants to seize.
But it could mean that someone else would have been cheated instead. It could be Abu Dhabi’s IPIC or it could be legitimate profits made from fund investment ventures.
But whose money would that be then that was used to buy art, gamble, buy properties?. It could be Abu Dhabi’s IPIC money, Saudi Arabia money or it could be legitimate profits made from fund investment ventures.
Source: LSS

ANALYSIS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CIVIL LAWSUITS

in Berita Utama by

(1) The US is a strong and powerful country, but this does not make them automatically right, or clever. The US Government has the largest military, diplomatic, intelligence and analytic resources that any government has ever had, and they still took a war and thousands of their sons’ lives into Iraq to destroy weapons of mass destruction that did not exist, and had never existed. They can be misled and they can be unintentionally misleading.

 

(2) The actions of the US Attorney General this week are far less risky. There is no criminal indictment of anyone. The Attorney General spent much of her presentation making it clear that the intention of this action is to send a message to the world, that improper use of its banking system would not be tolerated. Unlike most Governments, the US Department of Justice can apply to a court to seize assets for which THEY DON’T NEED TO PROVE ANY WRONGDOING. Crazy, but true.

 

(3) Under US law, the Government have the right to seize assets, and challenge the owners to respond. Those owners will not be tried for any crime, but would have to persuade a court to recover the assets, against the might of the US Department of Justice… which in this case is channelling a tidal wave of political disinformation about Malaysia, originating in part from Tun Mahathir Mohamad’s Anti Najib Coalition.

 

(4) The US Government has said that the assets they want to seize belonged to 1MDB. Well, not according to the accountants and auditors and bankers. Whatever criticisms of the way 1MDB management conducted itself, whatever the weaknesses in its processes and business operations, these authorities do not report a loss that in any way matches what the US Department of Justice thinks that it has found. Admittedly, not for the first time the US Government is being outstripped by Tun Mahathir who claims to have found a 42 billion hole in 1MDB accounts. They cannot both be right. They are both wrong.

 

(5) The reason for this is very simple. These huge sums and movements refer to operations in the Middle East outside 1MDB that have never been under the control of 1MDB or Malaysia. Where 1MDB has refused to repay a debt to a UAE company, it has not been because it couldn’t, but in order to bring to court disputes all of which arise from confusing and reportedly improper dealings in the UAE, not Malaysia.

 

(6) When money has been lent to Malaysia, or borrowed from Malaysia, it has been paid back. In 2009, 1MDB invested with PetroSaudi International in foreign oil assets. The asset contributed by the Saudi partner failed, but they paid back the Malaysian contribution, with interest. They borrowed further from Malaysia, in an Islamic financial bond, and discharged the debt in full.

 

(7) It is easy to confuse the investment relationship with PetroSaudi, then part-owned by a Saudi prince, with the extraordinary close relationship of the Prime Minister with the late King Abdullah. Both involved major flows of finance through complex banking arrangements organised by the Saudi counterparts. Those wishing to destabilise Malaysia have deliberately combined the two and this has given rise to gross misrepresentation. But these were separate issues, and accounted separately to Bank Negara.

 

(8) As to the disputed funds originating from UAE, which the US wishes to seize: It is clear that the disputed funds relate to money flows OUTSIDE Malaysia, and OUTSIDE 1MDB’s businesses. The US Government should remember that individuals and companies are innocent unless proven guilty.

 

(9) The Malaysian situation is clear. The two priorities of this Government must be to ensure that Malaysia’s wealth is safe, and economy growing; and to ensure that all live in harmony and security. Malaysian foreign policy is driven by strong leadership, and by close relationships with countries that understand the extraordinary job that this Government has done for so long in managing racial and social cohesion and the economy.

 

(10) The US Attorney General’s speech echoed all the familiar attacks on Malaysia by our critics. When the US Government gains access to the information that the Saudi and Malaysian authorities have had for some time, maybe they will realise the disinformation they’ve been fed by Tun Mahathir’s ANC members in Malaysia.‎
source:

Tiada Siasatan Jenayah Sebenar Ke atas Isu 1MDB – Peguam Negara US

in Berita Utama by

 

US-AttorneyPeguam Negara Amerika Syarikat (US) mengakui pengumuman mengenai tindakan undang-undang ke atas beberapa individu adalah berdasarkan aduan bahawa mereka menyeleweng wang 1MDB dan terbabit dengan penggubahan wang haram BUKANNYA melalui siasatan jenayah yang biasa.
Saman sivil ini dilakukan di bawah Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative yang diusahakan sejak beberapa tahu lalu sebagai usaha menyekat penggubahan wang haram tidak menggunakan kaedah siasatan jenayah korupsi biasa.
Jabatan Kehakiman US juga tidak pasti sama ada wang yang ingin mereka rampas ini dari 1 Malaysia Development Berhad kerana 1MDB menafikan terdapat wang yang hilang.
1MDB has consistently maintained that no money was stolen and can account for where its money has gone to. However, 1MDB is currently in dispute with IPIC where 1MDB maintains that it has paid or deposited or guaranteed up to USD6 billion by a company called Aabar Investments PJS BVI upon the instructions of Aabar’s the then Chairman, Khadem Al Qubaisi and the then Managing Director.
IPIC disputes that it owns Aabar Investments PJS Ltd (BVI) and thus denies it has received these funds from 1MDB.
This dispute is now in arbitration at the London Arbitration Center and will take many months. However, 1MDB is confident that they will win this case and stand a good chance to recover their money – which is why 1MDB had earlier refused to pay the interest on a USD3.5 billion bonds despite comfortably able to, which triggered the bond guarantee by IPIC thus leading to the arbitration process.
FULL Q & A
The USA Govt’s Department of Justice (DOJ) have filed civil cases to seize the assets they believe is linked to 1MDB, from three individuals under the USA’s Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative.

Q1. Who are the three individuals?

They are Riza Aziz, stepson of Prime Minister Najib Razak; Jho Low, a Malaysian financier; and Khadem Al Qubaisi, the former managing director of Abu Dhabi’s sovereign-wealth fund IPIC and the former Chairman of Aabar Investments PJS responsible for dealing with 1MDB at that time.

Q2. What is the USA’s Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative?

It is an initiative started in the year 2010 by the USA Govt under the US Department of Justice (DOJ) with the aim to seize and recover assets within the USA which the DOJ suspects is linked to corruption from a foreign country and return them to the originating country.

Q3. Why is the DOJ investigating this case?

In March 2015, the DOJ received a complaint from Sarawak Report. Further complaints appears to also have been made by Tun Mahathir loyalist, Khairuddin Abu Hassan.

Q4. What is the DOJ actually filing against the 3 individuals and what will happen next?

The DOJ is filing civil cases against the 3 individuals to ask the courts to seize their assets. The courts will then check if the identified assets are being claimed by anyone else. If no one else is claiming these assets then the courts will ask the DOJ to prove that these assets have indeed been stolen or received illegally.

Q5. Is Prime Minister Najib Razak also charged?

No. He is not charged and not named in this case despite Tun Mahathir previously saying in September 2015 that Najib is afraid to go overseas as he will be caught by the FBI. This is untrue as not only is this a civil case but Najib is not even named in the suits.

Q5. Will anyone go to jail if the assets are seized?

No. These is a civil suit and not a criminal case. If the courts find in favour of the DOJ, only the assets are seized. There is no jail terms or criminal conviction.

Q6. If the court allows the assets to be seized, what happens to the seized assets?

The assets are eventually returned back to the whomever the DOJ believes it is stolen from – in this case, 1MDB.

Q7. Are the assets purchased with money stolen from 1MDB?

1MDB has consistently maintained that no money was stolen and can account for where its money has gone to. However, 1MDB is currently in dispute with IPIC where 1MDB maintains that it has paid or deposited or guaranteed up to USD6 billion by a company called Aabar Investments PJS BVI upon the instructions of Aabar’s the then Chairman, Khadem Al Qubaisi and the then Managing Director.

IPIC disputes that it owns Aabar Investments PJS Ltd (BVI) and thus denies it has received these funds from 1MDB.
This dispute is now in arbitration at the London Arbitration Center and will take many months. However, 1MDB is confident that they will win this case and stand a good chance to recover their money – which is why 1MDB had earlier refused to pay the interest on a USD3.5 billion bonds despite comfortably able to, which triggered the bond guarantee by IPIC thus leading to the arbitration process.

Q8. If the money is not stolen then why is the USA DOJ acting on the complaint?

It is possible that some of the money that was paid by 1MDB into the Aabar Investments PJS Ltd (BVI) controlled by Khadem – which IPIC denies is owned by them, may have been used to fund various investments in the USA including real estate, investment in films, artwork and companies.

Q9. How much worth in asset is impacted by the USA DOJ?
No specific amounts have been confirmed yet but reports by NYT and WSJ is quoting up to USD 1 billion.

Q10. Why is the PM’s step-son Riza Aziz involved.

WSJ had previously reported that investigators believe that Red Granite, Riza Aziz’s film company received USD$155 million in loans from the Aabar Investments PJS Ltd (BVI) much of which went to finance the 2013 movie “The Wolf of Wall Street. and to purchase properties.

WSJ said documents show three transfers to Red Granite Capital in 2012 – US$60 million, US$45 million, and US$50 million.

Of this, US$105 million was booked by Red Granite Capital as a loan, while the other US$50 million was moved to the company through intermediaries.

“Among the intermediaries, according to people familiar with investigations and the person familiar with 1MDB: Telina Holdings Inc, a company that had been set up in the British Virgin Islands by Mr Al-Husseiny and his boss, Khadem Al Qubaisi.”

According to WSJ , the US$50 million loan from Telina Holdings has been repaid, citing people familiar to the investigations.

A Red Granite spokesperson told WSJ that the company “has been repaying and will continue to repay all its loans. “Red Granite had no reason to believe at the time that the source of Aabar’s funds was in any way irregular and still believes the loan to be legitimate,”

“What Red Granite have done and will continue to do is develop and produce successful and acclaimed movies that have generated more than US$825 million in worldwide box-office revenues.”

Q11. So, if it was a loan or investment into Red Granite and is already part repaid or being repaid from a successful film company, why is Riza Aziz still the target of a civil suit?

In the USA, if you make profits based on funding which the DOJ suspects was from an illegal source then this is called “profiteering” and hence your profits are also considered illegal and can be seized – essentially making money out of illegal funding. This is different from stealing money.

The DOJ will then have to prove that Red Granite is aware that the funding or loan that they received is deemed illegal.

Q12. What about Jho Low’s investments?

Not much has been revealed what assets or the amounts of investments are owned by Jho Low, who is a fund manager, in the USA but Jho Low had confirmed before that he has real estate holdings in the USA and may have co-invested in some US-based companies.

Q13. How long will this civil cases take before a judgement is reached?

Similar cases have taken years as both sides present their arguments to the US courts for the judge to make a final decision.

Q14. Is there anything unusual about this case?

Yes. Typically, the supposed victim of any stolen money has to make a complain to the USA DOJ to request the DOJ to seize any assets they deem was purchased using the stolen money. In this case, 1MDB has consistently maintained that there is no money stolen and they can account for all their investments or transfers but the DOJ seems to be still going ahead with filing civil suits to recover stolen money even though the “victim” said no money has been stolen.
sumber:MyKMU

Lagi Fitnah Di Patahkan; Tidak Benar Zahid Hamidi Beri Saya Kerakyatan- Mohd Amin Nor

in Berita Utama by

Sebelum ini pihak haprak pakatan kononnya dengan eksklusif mendedahkan beberapa dokumen kononnya seorang bekas warganegara Bangladesh mendapat taraf warganegara secara fast track daripada Timbalan Perdana Menteri.
Dengan dokumennya bagai entah apa apa ini jenis fitnah eksklusif dari kumpulan yang sama buat fitnah mengenai cincin Rosmah.
Nah pengakuan dari empunya badan, dia dah lama jadi warganegara Malaysia ketika zaman Anwar Ibrahim lagi menjadi menteri.

Petaling Jaya — Ahli Perniagaan, Dato’ Sri Mohd Amin bin Abdul Nor, hari ini, tampil menafikan beliau mendapat kewarganegaraan secara “fast-track” daripada Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.
Dalam perbualan bersama Suara.tv, Mohd Amin yang berasal dari Bangladesh memberitahu bahawa beliau telah tinggal di negara ini sejak 28 tahun lalu, belajar bercakap dan menulis dalam bahasa Melayu dan menjalankan perniagaan di negara ini.
“Saya telah tinggal di negara ini sejak 28 tahun lalu. Berkahwin dengan orang tempatan dan mempunyai anak. Dan menjalankan perniagaan sejak 90 an lagi di negara ini.
Sebelum menetap di Malaysia Mohd Amin pernah merantau ke beberapa negara termasuk Jepun dan Singapura sebelum membuat keputusan menetap di Malaysia pada sekitar 90-an. Sejak itu beliau menjalan perniagaan berasaskan pembekalan sumber manusia sehingga sekarang.
Dalam wawancara tersebut juga Mohd Amin menegaskan “Lebih penting ialah dakwaan saya mendapat kewarganegaraan melalui Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid tidak benar kerana pada ketika saya mendapat kewarganegaraan, beliau belum menjadi Menteri KDN apatah lagi Timbalan Perdana Menteri.”
Nama Mohd Amin muncul dalam radar politik negara sejak setahun lalu apabila dituduh mempunyai kaitan rapat dengan Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.
Nama beliau menjadi tumpuan apabila beberapa pihak tidak berpuas hati dengan kemunculan Bestinet Sdn Bhd sebagai salah satu penyedia aplikasi dalam talian Sistem Pengurusan Bersepadu Pekerja Asing untuk KDN.
Pengerusi Eksekutif Bestinet, Tan Sri Azmi Khalid sebelum ini turut menafikan syarikat terbabit mengenakan caj berlebihan ke atas pekerja asing atau terbabit dalam peningkatan kemasukan pekerja asing.
Bukan Kenalan mahu pun Proksi Zahid
Dakwaan bahawa beliau merupakan proksi dan kenalan kepada Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi sehingga membolehkan sebuah syarikat Bestinet Sdn Bhd mendapat kontrak menyediakan aplikasi permohonan dalam talian untuk kemasukan pekerja asing juga merupakan satu kesalahan fakta.
Menurut Mohd Amin, syarikat beliau Bestinet Sdn Bhd telah dibenarkan membagunkan sistem dan menjalankan ujian keberkesanan sistem oleh Menteri Dalam Negeri sebelum Zahid dan Perdana Menteri sebelum Mohd Najib.
“Jadi tidak timbul saya proksi kepada Ahmad Zahid atau isteri Perdana Menteri.” – Suara.tv

PENANG GOVT REMINDED A FOURTH TIME TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED 3RD PENANG BRIDGE

in Berita Utama by

Press Statement for Immediate release.

15 July 2016

My first statement on the subject of proposed 3rd Penang Bridge was on the 20 May 2016 where I had pointed out that there are no records of any applications or discussions by the Penang State Government with my Ministry.
Subsequently, the YAB Penang Chief Minister had confirmed that there was indeed no such applications made before saying that he was not brave to apply before.
I now refer to my subsequent statements on this matter issued on 22 May 2016, 11 June 2016 and 13 July 2016.
Three times that I have requested the Penang Government to submit their EXISTING feasibility and detailed design study reports for the Penang Tunnel and 3 associated paired roads to my Ministry for us to peruse and make an informed decision prior to our meeting.
But three times, including a statement today, that the YAB Penang Chief Minister has ignored this request and gave the reason that a NEW feasibility study for a bridge will be expensive and wants an approval-in-principle first.
I had never requested the Penang State Government for a NEW feasibility study for the proposed 3rd bridge.
I am not sure why there seems to be a confusion – whether deliberate or otherwise – between EXISTING reports and a NEW report but this continued confusion over the past two months is most unproductive for both of us.
No authority in the world will give approval in principle for a major infrastructure project costing billion via a two page letter sent to us by the Penang Govt. I am not sure if this is a standard practice in Penang but this is not what our Ministry practices.
If your EXISTING studies costing up to RM305 million for is completed or 83% completed and that the Penang Government has already made part payment of RM135 million for – as confirmed 3 months ago by the Penang Government, I do not understand the difficulty that the Penang Government has in sending these reports to us to support their application and to assist us to deliberate on the project.
Therefore, for avoidance of doubt or any repeats of misunderstanding or confusion by the Honorable Chief Minister, these are the proposed preliminary steps for both parties:
1. Submit your existing feasibility study and detailed design reports on the 3 paired roads which I understand from you is fully completed. Submit the feasibility study for the Penang Tunnel which I understand from you is 83% complete.

2. The Works Ministry will study these reports prior to our proposed meeting with the YAB Penang Chief Minister.

3. The Works Minister and a team from our Ministry will meet with the YAB Chief Minister and his team to discuss this.

4. If the results of our deliberation and our discussion is favourable and point to a need for a 3rd link, an approval-in-principle will be given.

5. Once the approval-in-principle is given, the Penang state Government is free to pursue their NEW feasibility study for a 3rd bridge.
I trust that the above step-by-step discussion is understandable to all.
As this request to the Penang State Government to submit the existing studies and reports has been outstanding for almost two months and in the interest of avoiding any further delays, I expect the Penang State Govt to submit these documents within 7 days latest by next Friday in order to facilitate a subsequent meeting between us.
DATO’ SRI HAJI FADILLAH BIN HAJI YUSOF

Minister for Works, Malaysia.

Tn Ibrahim Tempelak Khalid Pandap Sambil Mendambakan Pakatan  Dap PKR.

in Berita Utama by

Timbalan Presiden Pas menempelak Khalid Samad agar tutup mulut malah menegaskan pakatan haprak lebih aman tanpa PAN.
Mengesahkan betapa masih ada tersisa rasa cinta nan syahdu dibenak Tuan Ibrahim terhadap Dap dan PKR.
Pisau berasakan ada kelainan dengan nada Tn Ibrahim dengan presiden Pas Hj Hadi yang berpatah arang tidak akan bersama Dap lagi yang disahkan sebagai kafir harbi.
Adakah dengan tiadanya PAN , Pas akan kembali berselera berselingkoh bersama Dap? 
Parti PAN ibarat anak haram hasil hubungan Pas dan Dap, setelah Pas berpisah dengan Dap, parti ultrakiasu rasis chauvanis mengambil hak penjagaan dan memberi nafkah agar PAN dapat hidup.
DAP mendidik PAN agar membenci PAS kerana PAS tidak setia dan sanggup meruntuhkan rumahtangga pakatan hingga anak anak seperti PAN berperang dan derhaka terhadap PAS.
Tuan Ibrahim mungkin masih teringat akan kemanisan berpegang tangan dengan pemimpin kafir harbi DAP. Mungkin masih mendalam rindunya berpadu tenaga bersama PKR.
Kenyataan Tuan Ibrahim  bunyinya seperti memujuk rayu agar dikembalikan kawasan yang PAS pernah bertanding sambil mengingatkan agar PAS hanya berselera untuk lawan Umno sebuah parti yang menyokong RUU Syariah yang dibentang Hadi.

Timbalan Presiden PAS, Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man meminta Pengarah Komunikasi Parti Amanah Negara (AMANAH), Khalid Samad agar tutup mulut dan membubarkan parti itu.
Tuan Ibrahim berkata demikian sebagai mengulas cadangan Khalid agar beliau dan Naib Presiden PAS, Datuk Iskandar Abd Samad meninggalkan PAS.
“Komen saya, blok pembangkang akan tenang kalau Khalid boleh ‘tutup mulut’ atau AMANAH dibubarkan,” katanya.
Khalid mencadangkan sedemikian jika PAS tidak lagi sudi atau mampu membawa mesej Islam sebagai rahmatal-lil-’aalamin (rahmat ke seluruh alam).
Bercakap kepada Malaysiakini, Tuan Ibrahim menegaskan, saranan itu dibuat kerana menjangka AMANAH bakal berdepan masalah dalam pembahagian kerusi di kalangan blok pembangkang.
“Saya sebagaimana orang ramai melihat AMANAH akan berhadapan dengan masalah kerusi mana yang akan ditandingi pada pilihan raya umum (PRU) akan datang.
“Keadaan ini akan mendedahkan persaingan tiga penjuru sebagaimana dalam pilihan raya kecil (PRK) lalu,” tambahnya.
Bagaimanapun, keadaan akan berlaku sebaliknya jika DAP atau PKR bersedia untuk menyerahkan beberapa kerusi mereka kepada rakan dalam Pakatan Harapan itu, jelas Tuan Ibrahim lagi.
Jika tidak, sebab itu adalah lebih strategik dan baik untuk AMANAH diserapkan sahaja ke dalam parti pembangkang sedia ada, ujar beliau.
Mengulas lanjut, Tuan Ibrahim berkata, negara sebenarnya tidak memerlukan terlalu banyak parti politik dalam blok pembangkang semata mata kerana kecewa atau ingin menjadi pemimpin.
“Sikap ‘tidak boleh bekerja di bawah orang’ adalah antara sebab muncul pelbagai parti politik,” katanya.
Dalam pada itu, Tuan Ibrahim turut menegaskan beliau tiada mempunyai masalah untuk bekerja bersama Presiden PAS dan saf kepimpinan parti itu yang ada.
“Kami sangat bahagia, seronok dgn kemanisan ukuhwah sangat dirasai.
“Sikap hormat menghormati, berlapang dada dengan perbezaan serta thiqah kepada pimpinan menjadi nadi kekuatan PAS kini,” tambahnya.

Pisau kata ” apa sebenarnya yang Pas mau.. sokongan Umno depa nak utk RUU, kemudian ludah dan hina pulak Umno.. tak ka pelaq puak ni”

Selagi Wujudnya Dap, Umat Islam Dan Melayu Berterusan Akan Dihina Dan Di Momokkan.

in Berita Nasional by

Sesiapa saja pasti akan melakukan bantahan dan meluahkan ketidakpuasan hati mereka sekiranya agama, bangsa atau hak mereka dihina dan dicabuli oleh pihak-pihak yang berniat tidak baik.
Ini yang terjadi kepada umat Islam di Malaysia pada hari ini. Bukan sekali bahkan sudah berulang kali umat Islam di sini berhadapan dengan provokasi melampau dan biadap dari kepimpinan DAP. Perayaan Aidilfitri tahun ini pula menjadi sasaran pemimpin rasis Nga Kor Ming.
Pemimpin DAP ini dilihat senantiasa melakukan provokasi di dalam akaun Facebook miliknya yang kini telah ‘lenyap’ secara tiba-tiba. Kenapa DAP perlu mewujudkan suasana tegang antara kaum terutama Cina dan Melayu sedangkan kita boleh hidup dalam suasana aman serta saling hormat menghormati antara satu sama lain?
Tidak adil sekiranya banyak pihak melabelkan orang Melayu & ahli UMNO yang menentang Nga Kor Ming di hadapan Ibu Pejabat DAP tempoh hari sebagai samseng. Apa pula label yang sesuai untuk kita berikan kepada pemimpin DAP sekiranya mereka berada di dalam situasi yang sama seperti umat Islam cuba menyerahkan memorandum permohonan maaf?
Selagi fanatik Kristian seperti Nga Kor Ming terus menghina Islam, selagi itu pastinya orang Melayu dan Islam akan bangkit menentang secara lebih agresif disebabkan corak politik DAP yang jelas ke arah perkauman dan mereka sendiri tidak mampu mengawal tingkah laku luar batasan ahli-ahli serta pemimpin mereka.
Mana-mana agama sekalipun jika mereka diancam dan dihina pasti tahap kesabaran ada batasnya. Jika orang Buddha dan Hindu dihina sedemikian rupa berulang kali secara biadap, penganutnya akan bangun menentang.
Demi kebaikan dan keamanan negara, kami mendesak kerajaan supaya mengembalikan semula Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA) bagi membantu meningkatkan penguatkuasaan pihak berkuasa dalam menjaga keselamatan awam terutama terhadap mereka yang sengaja mencetuskan suasana tegang antara kaum.
Akta Hasutan yang sedia ada hari ini dilihat mempunyai kelemahannya tersendiri. Banyak kes yang disabit di bawah akta ini tidak dapat diteruskan dan akhirnya ditangguhkan begitu saja. Kami mohon agar Jabatan Peguam Negara mengkaji semula dan menambahbaik keperluan yang ada untuk Akta Hasutan ini agar ianya dapat mencegah pemimpin rasis DAP daripada bertindak sesuka hati tanpa batasan.
Rakyat boleh hidup dengan aman dan tanpa ada prejudis antara kaum sekiranya DAP tidak lagi wujud di muka bumi ini.
Datuk Huan Cheng Guan.
Naib Presiden
Parti Cinta Malaysia.

Adakah Pas Mahu Kembali Menjadi Jalang Dap?

in Berita Utama by

Masih adakah gerembolan Anwarinas dan penjilat tegar Dap didalam Pas?

Persoalan diatas terjawap apabila Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man menyuarakan kegelisahan dek kerana Pas sudah jauh tersasar daripada kiblat Dap dan PKR.

Di dalam Pas , ramai yang sudah menyedari siapakah musuh sebenar seperti PKR dan Dap. Pas satu ketika bagaikan tersedar betapa mereka memerlukan Umno untuk meluluskan Rang Undang Undang Syariah.

Namun segelintir tidak boleh menerima hakikat betapa Pas amat memerlukan sokongan Umno sebaliknya mengangkat Hj Hadi sebagai hero hingga terlupa siapa dibelakang kejayaan Pas .

Sebenarnya masih ramai didalam Pas yang berasa gian untuk berselingkoh bersama Dap.

 Mungkin benda yang haram lebih sedap berbanding bertahaluf dengan sebuah parti yang diketahui ramai istiqamah memperjuangkan hak bangsa melayu dan Islam sejak merdeka lagi seperti Umno.

Apa masaalah sebenarnya didalam Pas. Adakah mereka mahu menjilat kembali ludah selepas berpatah arang tidak akan kembali bersama Dap dan PKR. Atau mereka mahu menjadi kuasa politik blok ke tiga.

Pas seolah tidak berpijak dibumi hatta naik ke langit , hanya ditengah tengah seperti roh orang mati bunuh diri..

Tindakan Timbalan Presiden PAS Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man yang menyeru gencatan senjata sesama pembangkang dan mahu bersatu menumbangkan BN memberi indikasi hasrat terpendam dalam dirinya mahu kembali tahaluf siyasi dengan DAP . 

PAS hari ini menyeru “gencatan senjata” sesama pembangkang, sebaliknya menggembleng tenaga bersama untuk menumbangkan BN.

Timbalan presidennya Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man berharap pertelagahan sesama mereka kini dapat ditamatkan demi rakyat dan masa depan negara.

“Pertama, parti-parti pembangkang perlu melaksanakan gencatan serangan sesama sendiri bagi memberi fokus kepada musuh sebenar Umno-BN.

“Jangan pedulikan tulisan murahan tentera siber yang suka melagakan antara satu sama lain. Golongan ini akan ada di setiap zaman dan tempat.

“Apa yang penting dilihat ialah masa depan negara.
“Kerana masa depan rakyat, agama, bangsa bahkan parti politik hanya akan wujud bila adanya kestabilan negara,” kata Tuan Ibrahim dalam kenyataannya hari ini.

Pisau kata ” nak jadi jalang Dap lagi?”

Dap Sekali Lagi Hina Kedaulatan Negara, Dihentam Oleh Netizen Bukti Rakyat Semakin Muak.

in DAP by

Dap lebih cina dari cina di China.. Pisau lihat sikap pemimpin Dap ultrakiasu rasis dan chauvanis malah mereka tidak pernah berasa sayang kepada negara.

Berkiblatkan negara kesayangan mereka seperi Singapura hingga bercita cita mahu menjadikan Malaysia sama seperti Singapura yang menghapuskan hak pribumi.

Mencetuskan ketegangan kaum, mencetuskan ketidak tenteraman sesama agama lain menjadi salah satu agenda penting. Menjadi satu masaalah besar buat Dap jika rakyat dinegara ini hidup harmoni dan aman.

Mereka mengharapkan rakyat berasa tidak tenteram maka mereka menjadi jarum mencucuk setiap nadi kesabaran rakyat hingga ada yang terpengaruh dengan politik gampang mereka.

Yang terbaru selepas Nga Khor Meng jutawan balak yang menghina umat Islam. Seorang lagi ultrakiasu rasis chauvanis Dap mencetuskan kontroversi.

Sikap beliau yang tidak patriotik dihentam keras oleh netizen di Facebook.

AP’s “Superman” Hew Kuan Yau has been slammed by netizens for a Facebook post he wrote about China’s claims to the South China Sea.

“南海是中國的!不要因為反共而反華 (The South China Sea belongs to China! Don’t oppose China just because you are anti-communist),” Hew wrote today in a terse Facebook post.

He was immediately castigated by Facebook users who disputed China’s “historical claim” to the economic rights of large swaths of the region.

“You are mad! No such thing as historical claim,” netizen Kok Shin Shan commented.

“You may hate BN but don’t disown your country’s sovereign right! I hope this is NOT DAP’s stand as far as SCS disputes are concerned.”

Netizen Alexandra Wales explained the matter for Hew’s benefit, saying that China’s claim to the South China Sea went against Malaysia’s ownership of part of the area and exclusive economic zone.

“Is this how a Malaysian citizen talks?” she asked.

“More importantly, is this what DAP endorses? The question of anti-communism or anti-China does not arise here. This is purely a matter of the law.”

Another netizen, Joe Mamak, questioned whether Hew expected the heated reaction to his statement.

“Did you stop and think how your comments could be used against you and DAP? Didn’t something similar happen recently? (How) your foul mouth got you into trouble as well as it did for DAP

Pisau kata ” Dap makin melampau, kenapa tidak haramkan saja parti ni”

Umat Islam Pun Tahu Cara Nak “Bergurau” Terhadap Ultra Kiasu Rasis Dap !

in Berita Utama by

Sejauh mana umat Islam dinegara ini boleh bertahan dengan penghinaan dan cercaan pemimpin Dap.

Penghinaan oleh Tauke balak memerangkap ahli parlimen Dap mengenai duit raya dianggap hanya sebagai gurauan.

Umat Islan dinegara ini bebas dimaki hamun, dicerca, dipermainkan, dipersoalkan dan pelbagai lagi bentuk serangan dan tekanan oleh golongan ultrakisu chauvanis rasis Dap.

Pisau tidak akan berasa terkejut jika selepas ini ada perkara buruk yang akan berlaku keatas pemimpin Dap kerana mungkin umat Islam pula akan “bergurau” hingga pemimpin Dap lari tak cukup tanah.

Trend baling batu sembunyi tangan ini sudah ramai yang tahu dan nampak terang terangan.Ada yang hanya menunggu masa untuk membalas balik bentuk gurauan yang Dap lakukan.

Pisau kata ” kita pun boleh bergurau kasar jugak kalau nak.. ”

Penang Institute is run by dogs. To woof or to bite , they need the permission of Tokong?Another Drama From Dap Propaganda Factory !

in Berita Utama by


Sebenarnya apabila Lin Guan Eng mengarahkan Penang Institute agar patuh pada arahan beliau Pisau berasakan ia hanya sekadar wayang.
Gelaran anjing tak lebih kepada membangkitkan persepsi bahawa Penang Institute sebagai badan yang tidak bebas.
Tahukah anda Penang Institute bersama kumpulan G25 menentang keras undang undang syariah. Klik sini
Pisau lihat gelaran yang diberikan sekadar untuk menutup kerja jahat dan mencuci dosa Penang Institute seolah segala tindakan mereka tidak bebas .
Lim Guan Eng dan Penang Institute yang dibayar jutaan ringgit hanya cuba mengalihkan skandal rasuah yang membabitkan jutaan ringgit yang menguntungkan Lim Guan Eng dan isterinya Betty Chew.
Pisau kata ” kaki rasuah masih nak bertaichi”

Tiga Pemaju biayai wang jaminan Guan Eng?

in DAP by

Kutipan derma wang jaminan sebanyak RM1 juta yang didakwa berjaya diperolehi dalam waktu yang singkat juga mula menimbulkan keraguan pelbagai pihak.

Menurut sumber, dana hampir RM 1.44 juta yang dterima DAP dalam masa 21 jam selepas kempen kutipan “RM10 seorang” dilancarkan itu dipercayai diperolehi daripada tiga pemaju dan beberapa syarikat yang mendapat banyak projek daripada kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang selain daripada sumbangan ahli-ahli perniagaan.

“Situasi ini telah dimanipulasikan oleh Guan Eng untuk tunjukkan kononnya beliau masih mendapat sokongan kuat daripada rakyat. Pada hal, pemaju-pemaju ini yang biayai kos sebab ada projek mereka yang belum siap dan mahu dapat projek yang lebih besar akan datang.

“Tetapi sebenarnya kebanyakkan pemimpin DAP yang memberi sokongan datang daripada luar Pulau Pinang, bukan dari sini (Pulau Pinang),” katanya.

sumber

Pisau kata ” selamat hari raya dan selamat bercuti kepada pembaca setia blog Pisau”

‘PROTES SENYAP’ TERHADAP GUAN ENG SEMAKIN BESAR DI PULAU PINANG?

in Berita Utama by

Pendakwaan dua kes rasuah terhadap Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Lim Guan Eng baru-baru ini oleh Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) sedikit sebanyak telah menggugat sokongan bukan sahaja daripada rakyat tetapi daripada ahli DAP itu sendiri.

Sebaik sahaja dibebaskan dengan ikat jamin RM1 juta, Guan Eng melalui kerajaan negeri yang diketuainya terus mengadakan “Sesi Penerangan Ketua Menteri Bersama Rakyat” di Dewan Sri Pinang, Georgetown, Pulau Pinang.

Walaupun dihadiri pimpinan utama Pakatan Harapan seperti Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Dr. Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, Pengerusi PAN, Mohamad Sabu, Penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang, Naib Presiden PKR, Nurul Izzah dan beberapa pimpinan tinggi yang lain, kehadiran majils itu hanya sekitar 600 hingga 700 orang sahaja.

Jumlah ini sangat sedikit jika diambil kira dengan pemilihan lokasi program yang diadakan di kawasan pulau yang merupakan kubu kuat DAP di Pulau Pinang. Ini bermakna DAP sudah tidak yakin lagi sokongan rakyat terhadap mereka masih lagi seperti dahulu. Mereka memilih jalan selamat untuk menarik kehadiran yang tinggi untuk menunjukkan sokongan Guan Eng masih lagi mendapat sokongan rakyat.

Sama juga yang berlaku dalam program “Walk With Guan Eng” yang diadakan di Lebuh Pantai, Georgetown anjuran kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang yang dihadiri hanya sekitar 350 orang sahaja. Kumpulan ‘anti-Lim Guan Eng’ seperti ADUN Tanjung Bungah, Teh Yee Cheu masih memboikot dan menolak sebarang gerakkan solidariti ini.
Selepas Guan Eng didakwa atas pertuduhan rasuah, penolakkan terhadap Guan Eng semakin ketara. Ahli-ahli DAP mula meragui beberapa tindakan Guan Eng yang meragukan dan tidak seiring dengan polisi DAP yang diamalkan selama ini.

Menurut sumber, beberapa banner telah dinaikkan di beberapa kawasan yang mendesak Guan Eng bercuti dari memegang jawatan Ketua Menteri sehingga perbicaraan kes selesai.

Antara tulisan yang tertera di banner tersebut ‘Guan Eng Should Go On Leave’, ‘LGE a Corrupt Leader’, ‘Practise What You preach LGE’, dan ‘No Corrupt leader In DAP’ selain daripada banner-banner bertulisan Cina.

Sumber

Beza antara pemimpin-pemimpin negeri Pakatan Rakyat.

in Pakatan Rakyat by

One case was decided via ceramah. One case is to be decided in the courts.
The first case decided via ceramah and 91 pages written by Lapiji was then decided to be entirely false after Khalid had sued PKR where PKR had issued an unconditional apology in court over all false claims – which is why Khalid resigned.
The second case has been decided to be “baseless” by the “Supreme Court” of the Penang State DAP committee although the actual criminal court case has yet to be heard – which is why Tokong is still CM and refuse to resign or take leave.

 ‘asas perjuangan’ DAP sendiri sudah comot dan berlumpur – Reezal Merican

in BN by

1. Penahanan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Lim Guan Eng adalah tindakan yang wajar sesuai dengan segala bukti yang telah diperoleh SPRM selama ini. Lim tidak boleh terkecuali dan berselindung di sebalik kedudukan sebagai Ketua Menteri dan hakikat ini mesti diterima secara terbuka oleh semua pihak.

2. Samada DAP mahu mengakuinya ataupun tidak, penahanan Guan Eng ini sudah sama sekali meruntuhkan kepercayaan rakyat terhadap aspirasi parti DAP.

3. ‘Deklarasi Tanjong’ milik DAP yang dicanangkan sejak 1992 – yang menekankan soal usaha melawan autokrasi, rasuah, eksploitasi dan penindasan; sudah bercoreng dengan kes Guan Eng.

4. Benar, Guan Eng tidak bersalah selagi tidak dihukum (innocent until proven guilty); namun pembawaan kes ini ke mahkamah menggambarkan ‘asas perjuangan’ DAP sendiri sudah comot dan berlumpur.

5. Jika Guan Eng mempunyai sedikit rasa tanggungjawab – beliau wajar mengosongkan Pejabat Ketua Menteri sepanjang kes ini berada dalam perbicaraan.

6. Keengganan Guan Eng mengosongkan jawatan, memberi bayangan kesungguhan DAP membanteras rasuah adalah ‘retorik politik’ dan bukannya komitmen yang bersungguh.

7. Minta Guan Eng rujuk pendirian tegas ‘Deklarasi Anti Rasuah DAPSY di Kulai’ (1993). Jika Guan Eng punya harga diri, beliau juga wajar meletakkan jawatan sebagai Setiausaha Agung secara serta merta. Lumut dan keladak rasuah DAP tidak boleh ditutup dengan politik simpati.
Datuk Seri Reezal Merican

Timbalan Pengerusi

Badan Perhubungan UMNO Pulau Pinang

If The Person Is Charged,He Must Go On Leave! – Tony Pua

in Berita Utama by


Understand the Charge Against Lim Guan Eng
3 steps to develop a land
A. Convert the land from Agriculture status to residential or commercial status

– this authority rest solely with the State Government with the Chief Minister as Chairman of Land Committee.
2. Upon approval by State Government, land owner will submit to the Council for planning permission.
3. Once planning permission is obtained, then land owner will submit building plan to the Council. When the building plan is approve, land owner can proceed to build.

-step 2&3 are solely the authority of the Council under the President of the Council.
In the case of Lim Guan Eng, he and local goverment exco, Chow Kon Yeow maintained that the application was rejected by the Council. This has nothing to do with the charge.
Lim Guan Eng was charged approving the conversion as he chaired the meeting. This is the 1st step as describe above.
What Guan Eng and Chow tried to explain is the 2&3 steps described above.
The 2&3 steps are not the subject of the charge!
Guan Eng was charged on the issue because his wife., Betty Chew is a business partner of Phang Li Khoon who was the one submitted the conversion. She subsequently sold her house undervalued to Guan Eng.
– from a former MPPP Councillor.

Poetic Justice Buat DAP

in Berita Utama by

1. Sungguhpun saya tidak mengulas apa-apa mengenai kes Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Y.A.B. Lim Guan Eng, saya tidak boleh menghalang pelbagai pihak membuat perbandingan dan kenyataan.
2. Namun apabila En Lim Guan Eng sendiri membuat kenyataan membandingkan kes beliau dengan kes saya, maka saya berasakan perlu membetulkan kenyataan beliau.
3. LGE membuat kenyataan, “Tidak seperti kes Khir Toyo, Cik Phang tidak rugi RM 5 juta, malah memperoleh keuntungan kecil sebanyak RM 300 ribu daripada harga asal RM 2.5 juta. Tidak seperti kes Khir Toyo, Cik Phang bukanlah pemaju perumahan yang harus bergantung kepada kerajaan negeri untuk meneruskan perniagaannya.”
4. Jawapan saya, “tidak seperti beliau membeli rumah yang lengkap dan sedia diduduki, LGE meninggalkan fakta bahawa saya membeli sebuah rumah separuh siap tanpa CF dengan harga RM 3.5 juta.”
5. Harga ini mengikut penilaian penilai hartanah yang berwibawa dan bank antarabangsa.
6. Harga asal RM 6.5 juta merupakan sebuah rumah lengkap sekali dengan perabot (fully furnished). Ia sudah merupakan dua entiti yang berbeza.
7. Saya suka mengingatkan LGE keputusan Mahkamah ke atas saya langsung tidak mengambil kira hakikat penjual rumah saya tidak mendapat apa-apa keistimewaan dari Kerajaan Negeri Selangor pimpinan saya.
8. Malah permohonan syarikat Shamsudin yang disokong oleh saya juga ditolak oleh PKNS.
9. Saya bersalah kerana dalam pertuduhan di bawah Seksyen 165 Kanun Keseksaan bukanlah kerana mengambil rasuah, tetapi kerana menyalahguna kedudukan sebagai penjawat awam untuk mendapatkan sesuatu barangan berharga dengan balasan tidak mencukupi (lebih murah dari nilai sebenar) dari seseorang yang mempunyai urusan rasmi dengan saya.
10. Dalam kes saya, Mahkamah mendapati saya bersalah kerana saksi Pendakwa, Shamsuddin Haryoni, memberitahu Mahkamah beliau tidak setuju dengan harga RM 3.5 juta tetapi terpaksa menjualnya kerana bimbang perniagaan beliau di Selangor terjejas.
11. Justeru, saya nasihatkan Lim Guan Eng berhenti membandingkan kes beliau dengan kes saya. 
12. Malah kes saya tidak sama dengan beliau kerana beliau turut didakwa di bawah Seksyen 23 Akta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) 2009 yang tentunya membabitkan kesalahan lebih serius.
13. Ketika saya dihukum penjara, DAP menganggap ia satu kemenangan besar mereka. Justeru, sungguhpun saya bersimpati dengan nasib Lim Guan Eng, saya fikir kenyataan paling tepat untuk DAP ialah seperti yang diungkapkan oleh Naib Presiden Parti Cinta Malaysia, Datuk Huan Cheng Guan, – “Padan Muka”.
14. Bagi saya pendakwaan ini adalah “Poetic Justice”!
– Dr Mohamad Khir Toyo (2 Julai 2016)

A Bad Precedent For Malaysia ! “From now on, any civil servant who is charged with corruption can continue in their jobs.”

in Berita Utama by

The failure of the Chief Minister of Penang to step down after being charged in Court for Corruption is a Bad Precedent in Malaysia.

As principle of good governance, any public servant who is charged in court of law should step down or step aside immediately.

All Barisan National leaders stepped down after being charged in Court – Harun Idris, Muhammaid Taib, and Khir Toyo.  DAP had set a Bad Precedent by allowing its Secretary-General Lim Guan Eng to remain as Chief Minister!

From now on, any civil servant who is charged with corruption can continue in their jobs.

Similarly, police officers who are charged with murder or beating the shit out of prisoners can continue in their exact same position while they fight the court case.

There is no need to be transferred or suspended.

Don’t worry. I guarantee you that from now on, DAP won’t complain at all.

C4, BERSIH, PKR and the Rakyat Hakim Negara will also agree.

Uncle Lim Kit Siang will give two thumbs up support.👍🏽👍🏽

And in case you don’t understand which is the highest courts in Malaysia to determine if anyone is guilty or not or whether the case have basis or not, here is a simple list to show you.

From least powerful court to most powerful court:
1. Sessions court
2. High Court
3. Appeals Court.
4. Federal Court
5. State DAP Committee

Dear CM Lim Guan Eng , why are you asking RM10 donation from public ?

in Berita Utama by

What happened to *RM200,000* that he *won* against Utusan in Dec 14, 2011( Source : http://bit.ly/29906jP )

 

What happened to *RM550,000* that he *won* against Perkasa in 26 March 2015 ( Source : http://bit.ly/29vrvvA )

 

What happened to *RM200,000* that he *won* against NSTP in 26 March 2015 ( Source : http://bit.ly/29vrvvA )

 

What happened to *RM250,000* that LKS *won* against Utusan in10 Dec 2015 ( Source : http://bit.ly/296xB93 )


Pisau kata ” suruh rakyat bayar atas kesalahan rasuah dia.. baik punya drama”

CHOW KON YEOW khianati LIM GUAN ENG

in DAP by

Pergolakan dalaman DAP di Pulau Pinang semakin memuncak. Mengikut sumber tertentu ada gerakan terancang dalam DAP Pulau Pinang yang ingin menyingkirkan CM Lim Guan Eng dari Pulau Pinang.
Antara rancangan tersebut adalah membongkar isu pembelian banglo di jalan PinHorn dan maklumat rahsia tersebut telah diserahkan oleh Pengerusi DAP Pulau Pinang kepada Parti Gerakan untuk menjatuhkan Lim Guan Eng setelah desakan dari DAP Pulau Pinang agar Lim Guan Eng kembali ke Melaka tidak diendahkan.

Pada 8 Mac 2008 di Hotel Hard Rock Café, Pulau Pinang. Lim Guan Eng telah mengambil jawatan Ketua Menteri yang sepatutnya diberi kepada Chow Kon Yeow. Antara perjanjian tersebut mengatakan bahawa Lim Guan Eng akan menjawat jawatan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang selama sepenggal dan akan menyerahkan kepada Chow Kon Yeow. Tetapi Lim Guan Eng telah mengkhianati perjanjian tersebut.

Ramai ahli parti kanan DAP percaya perjanjian itu membolehkan Guan Eng menjadi Ketua Menteri hanya satu penggal sebelum diserahkan kepada Pengerusi DAP negeri, Chow Kon Yeow.

Teh Yee Cheu Adun DAP-Tanjung Bunga seorang org kuat Chow Kon Yeow yang mendapat sokongan kuat di akar umbi DAP Pulau Pinang turut menyerang Lim Guan Eng dan membuat cadangan supaya penggal khidmat seorang Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang dihadkan kepada dua penggal sahaja tahun lalu.

Umum mengetahui Teh Yee Cheu telah meletakkan jawatan sebagai Setiausaha Organisasi DAP Pulau Pinang 3 hari sebelum Konvensyen DAP Negeri Pulau Pinang bermula.

Lim Guan Eng tidak bertanding dalam pemilihan DAP Pulau Pinang, mungkin kerana beliau sudah menjadi Setiausaha Agong DAP Nasional… the supreme leader of DAP. Ini adalah penggal terakhir Lim Guan Eng boleh menjawat jawatan Setiausaha Agong DAP dan juga Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang. Ia akan berakhir sebelum penggal Parlimen ke-13 tamat tempoh. 

Ini bermakna Lim Guan Eng bukan lagi Setiausaha Agong DAP menjelang PRU ke 14 nanti. Lim Guan Eng juga tidak disenangi oleh sebahagian besar pemimpin DAP Pulau Pinang yang melihat Lim Guan Eng sebagai “pemain impot” dalam politik Pulau Pinang.

Nampaknya agenda untuk menamatkan karier politik Lim Guan Eng telah berjaya. 

Selamat Tinggal Lim Guan Eng.
sumber:Dap


Hit Counter provided by Curio cabinets
Pergi ke Atas