Berita Hot Terkini

Husam: No hudud without consent of KeADILan and DAP

Filed Under ( , ) by pisau on 3.6.09

No unilateral decisions, no partner to impose its agenda on the others

By Wong Choon Mei

PAS vice president Husam Musa - who together with Umno’s Khairy Jamaluddin stirred a hornet’s nest following news reports that they had called for the introduction of hudud law - has said that any such move would first require the agreement of Pakatan Rakyat partners -  KeADILan and DAP.

“However, PAS will continue with its struggle to implement Hudud law, which is God’s law, by explaining to all quarters, including the Pakatan Rakyat component parties, until they are ready to accept the law,” Husam said.

“We will discuss the hudud law and if they cannot accept its implementation when the time comes, we will postpone it,” he added.

His gesture will sit well with both KeADILan and DAP leaders, who have been worried the comments might misrepresent the overall stance of the tripartite alliance. The trio had in August entered an agreement which requires any policy change to be made only after multi-lateral discussion and consent.

“We welcome Husam’s clarification,” said KeADILan Information Chief Tian Chua. “This again proves that Pakatan works on a consensus basis. No unilateral decisions are made and none of the partners will impose their own values or agenda on the others.”

Political maturity

Since the formation of the alliance to take on the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition in the March 2008 general election, doomsayers and political rivals have been predicting their bust-up on the basis of incompatible ideology.

But the trio has defied the odds and managed to stick together - prompting many analysts to come round to the view that perhaps they had more issues in common than differences.

“It’s natural to doubt that it can be all roses especially when you look at PAS and DAP. They seem so contrasting and they are also very strident about their stance. Yet the big break-up that everyone has been predicting hasn’t come and they have been together for quite a while already,” said a political analyst.

“I guess it shows their maturity as politicians and as political parties, otherwise they would have broken up long ago. Perhaps their commitment to their common causes has also been under-estimated. If not, they wouldn’t have been able to compromise or made the sacrifices that they have.”

Stirring up a storm

The issue over hudud - not new - stirred up a storm of reaction after Husam and Khairy both declared at an open debate they would implement the Islamic law if they came to power.

Their comments sparked an outcry from non-Muslim groups, including the Barisan Nasional component MCA as well as from the DAP. Hudud is feared by non-Muslims because it includes as punishment stoning to death and amputation of limbs.

“Hukum hudud is not Pakatan Rakyat policy and it is for Husam to clarify what he actually said,” veteran DAP leader Lim Kit Siang had written in his blog.

“If unclarified, Husam’s statement would create unease, anxiety and opposition not only among the 11% of the Chinese voters in the critical Kuala Terengganu by-election on Jan 17 but also among both Malay and non-Malay voters whether in Terengganu or the rest of Malaysia.”

Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak too tried to limit the damage from Khairy’s comments. The son-in-law of Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had been reported as saying he would implement hudud if he won the Umno Youth chief post. He has since said he was misquoted.

“This is an old story … it is nothing new. They (PAS) have not implemented the hudud laws in Kelantan and Terengganu but at every election they raise it as an issue,” Najib said.

Crucial Muslim votes

PAS and Umno are pitted against each other in the upcoming Kuala Terenggany parliamentary by-election. Some 88 percent of the 80,229-strong electorate are Malays, while Chinese make up nearly 11 percent.

Some pundits see the Chinese vote as a crucial decider, but there are others who believe there has been a flight of Malay sentiment from Umno to PAS since the last by-election contest.

According to the latter batch, this is why Najib - campaign director for the Umno-led Barisan Nasional - has avoided openly stating that they are against hudud for fear of alienating Muslim voters.

In the March general election, PAS candidate Mohamad Sabu lost by just 628 votes to Umno candidate Razali Ismail, the former deputy eductaion minister who died suddenly last month.

Meanwhile, Husam said national issues including racial unity, the New Economic Policy (NEP), corruption and the health of economy would take priority.

In particular, he said the existing NEP focused on the advancement of the Malays but neglected the needy among the Indians and Chinese, which PAS regarded as un-Islamic.

“The Hudud law is still hypothetical. There are other issues that have to take precedence,” he stated baldly. “What’s wrong with waiting longer? Umno has not done it after more than 50 years in power.”

sumber:suara keadilan online


Di mana yang mengatakan PAS perjuangkan agama islam?DAP & PKR berdehem sikit,PAS terus tarik handbrake. Betapa bacul nya pejuang pejuang yang konon nya mendokong ulamak & para ustaz yang  nya mahir segala bab ugama,maki hamun & fitnah menikus tanpa bermaruah dan berprinsip lari apabila takut kuasa politik tergugat.

Pembaca harus teliti apa kata Haji Nizar di DUN semasa bersidang tahun lepas.


Mana kamu punya "berjuang untuk islam", "undi PAS masuk syurga" , "tak undi PAS kafir" dan macam macam ayat bombastic, PAS yang mengadai Islam & memperbodohkan orang islam terang terangan namun apa boleh buat,dengan bermodal kan ugama,juak juak PAS begitu bergaya itu ini memperkata kan orang lain tidak betul hanya mereka yang betul & layak bercakap soal Islam.

Pisau sering mengelar PAS adalah pelacur politik,barangkali ada ayat lain yang lebih sesuai dari pelacur untuk PAS,apa kata anda?

Pisau kata " Orang PAS Perak beri maklumat,PAS PERAK Seleweng yuran keahlian, makan jangan tak makan bang!"

Comments:

13 Responses to “Husam: No hudud without consent of KeADILan and DAP”

  1. jahat betul PAS ni .....

    tak de yg lebih jahat dari sifat munafik....

    Parit.

  2. PAS likes to con the people and always put the blame/onus on others when PAS cannot and will not do it even when they are presented with the opportunity to do so.

    They claim that UMNO is kafir,and then complain that Umno has not done it after more than 50 years in power.

    Now they claim that any move to implement hudud would first require the agreement of Pakatan Rakyat partners.
    DAP and PKR,of course will never allow it.

    So problem solved for PAS.

  3. a coward so-called islamic leader.

    depan pengikut cakap lain. depan audience kafir cakap lain.

    apa guna slogan bombastic 'pas for all'?

    husam ni sebiji macam anwar juga.

  4. UMNO,BN, Dan semua parti yang menyokong demokrasi adalah sama je lebih kurang. Apa beza Demokrasi dan Komunis?? Sama je..

    Orang melayu kerja dengan Orang putih sebab nak jaga demokrasi..

    Orang Melayu yang lain sukarela join komunis sebab nak dapatkan senjata sebab nak lawan orang putih dan demokrasi laknatullah..

    Orang melayu yang kerja dengan demokrasi pada waktu itu pun salah.. Dah tahu penjajah,selagi nama dia penjajah,mereka tak akan ubah demokrasi ke arah islam.

    Orang melayu yang sukarela join komunis atas alasan senjata separuh salah,separuh betul. sALAH SEBAB join komunis. Betul kerana nak pertahankan agama dan bangsa dari demokrasi.

    Cubalah fikir...

  5. aku saja saja,

    tak faham aku apa hang punya komen, bagi la yang ilmiah skit,berbelit

  6. akusajasaja,

    abis tu sokong komunis lagi bagus ker kalau dah kata sama?

    apa punya statement la ko ni,sengal. mana ko belajar komunis tu sama dengan demokrasi

  7. bang pisau..

    pas = bohsia PR

  8. PAS = bibik PKR & DAP

  9. salam semua...

    aku saja saja

    apalah ko punya komen..ko cite pasal PKMM yek..bile pulak PKMM tu komunis..PKMM tu bukan ideologi komunislah mcm PKM..PKMM tu 'pertubuhan kebangsaan melayu malaya'..joint komunis utk dapatkn senjata saja..bukan menetang demokrasi..jgn pusing itu sejarah

  10. Gee..

    Kalau itu PKMM joint itu komunis untuk dapatkan senjata,seterusnya senjata yang mereka dapat itu untuk lawan siapa? Cuba kau fikir balik..

    Lepas tu untuk samdol-samdol politik yang dalam ni penjilat demokrasi. Mai sini bagitahu aku,DEMOKRASI tu datang dari Islam ke ha bengong? Jangan belit belit..Aku nak tengok sapa kat dalam ni blogger paling bahlol akan kata demokrasi itu 100 % peratus dari islam..hahaha

    DEMOKRASI itu datang dari orang putih!! Betapa punya bodoh korang ni. Kalau sesuatu prinsip yang datang dari orang kafir,maka...hahah..Kena bodoh la korang semua melayu oooii!!

    Melayu yang sedar ketika itu,pakai senjata komunis untuk hancurkan penjajah dan demokrasi. Cina komunis tahu bahawa jika mereka nak lawan orang melayu ketika itu sangat susah,tapi jika nak lawan melayu yang bekerja dengan omputih demokrasi itu sangat MUDAH!!

    Mati katak la sesapa yang keja jadi askar dengan omputih dulu..haha

    Seburuk orang melayu yang join komunis,dia orang buka sekolah pondok sekarang,mengajar ilmu islam dan mengaji...lu pikir la sendiri...

  11. akusaja saja

    apa ko ngarut tu? sejarah time exam dulu dapat brapa? tulis panjang2,ngantuk nak baca.melalut menyalak tak berilmiah lansung

    fakta tah..mana ko kutip.. bro..dah la tu nampak sangat kebodohan diri ko tu terserlah malukan PR jer

    ahli PAS

  12. salam semua..
    aku saja2

    tu lah lain kali membaca jgn duk dgr ceramah Anwar je..mereka memerlukan senjata selepas perang dunia kedua utk mempertahankan diri dari British ketika itu yg mengistiharkan mereka pengkhianat bangsa..BRITISH yg mengistiharkan mereka begitu...M'sia tidak pernah meletakkan mereka sebagai komunis...cari fakta tu..byk2 kan membaca

  13. sebagai ringkasan..utk aku saja2

    PKMM ditubuhkan selepas perang dunia kedua utk menentang BRITISH dan Malayan Union..mereka ini adalah pemimpin sayap kiri yg menetang sebarang syarat utk kemerdekaan yg di janjikn kepada TUANKU ketika itu..PKMM bukan menetang Tanah Melayu..Ketika Britis mengistiharkan mereka ini pengkhianat bangsa..mereka lari kedlm hutan utk mendapatkan senjata perlindungan..dan bergabung dgn Komunis utk mempertahankan diri..PKMM tidak mengamalkan idologi komunis seperti yg diputarbelitkan pembangkang..Dan disaat ini pun M'sia tidak pernah mengistiharkan mereka sebagai komunis..silap nye PKMM mereka menyerah diri ketika komunis menyerah kalah....byk2 membaca

Artikel Hot Minggu Ini

Followers

Anda Setuju Guan Eng Pembohong?

Join FB Pisau

www.pisau.net